All Forums | College Football

Bowl Special....Orange Bowl

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 6019
Posts: 48
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 6525
Posted: #26
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4418
Posted: #27
Any value in VT ML?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 7041
Posted: #28
RJ..GOOD LUCK ...PAC 10 WINS TONIGHT MY FRIEND...
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 729
Posted: #29
YOU KNOW IT! On em too SIZZLE!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 20924
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by RJSizzle:



Dont pair this with those 2 losers.



Hammer - I saw you post that elsewhere, but I wasnt saying that Stanford didnt play anybody, they had to play Oregon. I was just saying they havent beaten anyone. They dont have one impressive win.

I just think VT put together a much more impressive season. They played something like 8 bowl teams and Boise on a Neutral Field.

I also love the matchup for VT. GL with your wagers and your opinions.


Just got VT +4


So you added some more on top of your already +3.5 then. Just askin
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 6091
Posted: #31
Yes and No. Total risk of 15 Units still - well, 16.5 actually. I have 10 on the 3.5 and I was waiting and hoping for the best # on the last 5, wouldve taken the 3.5, but just happy that waiting paid off.

I learned my lesson on the Bama game where I laid 10.5 to everyone else laying 7.5, but that didnt matter there.

Lets hope it doesnt matter here.

GL with your wagers OB.



Composite - Yes, I see value in the VT ML. I think they are the better team tonight. I will probably dabble.

OU - Good to see you mang.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2401
Posted: #32
BOL tonight
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 9033
Posted: #33

Quote Originally Posted by RJSizzle:



Dont pair this with those 2 losers.



Hammer - I saw you post that elsewhere, but I wasnt saying that Stanford didnt play anybody, they had to play Oregon. I was just saying they havent beaten anyone. They dont have one impressive win.

I just think VT put together a much more impressive season. They played something like 8 bowl teams and Boise on a Neutral Field.

I also love the matchup for VT. GL with your wagers and your opinions.


Just got VT +4


ya i definitely understand both sides....should be a good one

good luck    

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 20924
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by RJSizzle:

Yes and No. Total risk of 15 Units still - well, 16.5 actually. I have 10 on the 3.5 and I was waiting and hoping for the best # on the last 5, wouldve taken the 3.5, but just happy that waiting paid off.

I learned my lesson on the Bama game where I laid 10.5 to everyone else laying 7.5, but that didnt matter there.

Lets hope it doesnt matter here.

GL with your wagers OB.



Composite - Yes, I see value in the VT ML. I think they are the better team tonight. I will probably dabble.

OU - Good to see you mang.


You did post 15 units on +3.5 in post #1 with all due respect. So you can understand why I would question post #26. Just like to have clarity, especially from a decent sports bettor as yourself...
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 840
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by oddsbuster:

You did post 15 units on +3.5 in post #1 with all due respect. So you can understand why I would question post #26. Just like to have clarity, especially from a decent sports bettor as yourself...


dont think it really matters if it is 10 or 15, he is on VT for those that follow.

And local gave me +6 VT so I will take that.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 6091
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by oddsbuster:

You did post 15 units on +3.5 in post #1 with all due respect. So you can understand why I would question post #26. Just like to have clarity, especially from a decent sports bettor as yourself...


Decent? You must be FANTASTIC if you think I am only decent. I have no idea who you are, but I will be looking for your threads from now on.

I am willing to post the bad line and take the win/loss on my posted record - its something I do often.

Thanks for stopping by and GL with your bets, champ.




 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 6091
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by CrunchNumbers:



dont think it really matters if it is 10 or 15, he is on VT for those that follow.

And local gave me +6 VT so I will take that.


That is a fantastic line.


 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 964
Posted: #38
va tech and taylor are horrible tonite.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 6091
Posted: #39
Have some meetings early tomorrow AM and wont be around to sum it up, but lets just say that I was completely wrong. What a fantastic game tonight by Stanford who really showed they were the superior team.

VT LOSER

16-9 +53.75 Units Bowling



Can Luck go #1 and Harbaugh coach the Panthers? Reunited and it feels so good?


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 35
Posted: #40

RJ love your capping skills....I never, ever post...this is the one time I was going to post and say it went against everything you normally do...never the less...I follow you all the time, because we think alike..I loved Stanford since the opening lines...better coach, better athletes, smarter athletes, adjustments at halftime, etc.

The best thing is -- no matter what people say you are a class act - you come back and say you were wrong...most would never do that.   Thanks for posting!!

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 20924
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by RJSizzle:



Decent? You must be FANTASTIC if you think I am only decent. I have no idea who you are, but I will be looking for your threads from now on.

I am willing to post the bad line and take the win/loss on my posted record - its something I do often.

Thanks for stopping by and GL with your bets, champ.




I try real hard to only stop by the good ones. Tonight you were wrong but I know that you will bounce back your record speaks for itself along with your reasoning. I like what i'm reading most of the time. GL on your next play...

I tried to sneak in the 2nd half over and failed. So believe when I say i'm not all smiles about the whole game...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 468
Posted: #42

Quote Originally Posted by RJSizzle:



Decent? You must be FANTASTIC if you think I am only decent. I have no idea who you are, but I will be looking for your threads from now on.

I am willing to post the bad line and take the win/loss on my posted record - its something I do often.

Thanks for stopping by and GL with your bets, champ.




 RJ is arguably the # 1 capper here on covers. To say that he's decent is absurd. This coming from a guy who moved to Las Vegas to bet on sports as a full time professional from 98-07.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 20924
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by AmazingMike:

 RJ is arguably the # 1 capper here on covers. To say that he's decent is absurd. This coming from a guy who moved to Las Vegas to bet on sports as a full time professional from 98-07.

 https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=33&sub=100910403&page=6

Reference post #149 before I ever once made any comments in sizzles threads today was my first. As I extend my apologies for the decent comment. You are rock solid bro...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 66896
Posted: #44

Was shocked to see you on the Hokies.....

 

 

Thought you would be backing the Team  with a QB....

 

BOL Brother

May you sweep the Card

BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 37191
Posted: #45
 Stanford was one of the easier plays of the season........surprised to see you fade them.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 66896
Posted: #46

Wondering what you think about the Sugar Bowl

Hard to back away from the +140 Arkansas ML .....

 

BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 10863
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:

 Stanford was one of the easier plays of the season........surprised to see you fade them.
  Very surprised at that comment Muggs.  Haven't been posting lately, health issues, and I had Stanford last night, but  would never come into RJ's, or anyone else's thread, after the game, and make such an " arrogant statement".  Hope you made a lot of money on the game, because you might need it to buy back some of the lost respect.  Don't know if you can put a price on that.  BOL
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 468
Posted: #48

Quote Originally Posted by 222bad:

  Very surprised at that comment Muggs.  Haven't been posting lately, health issues, and I had Stanford last night, but  would never come into RJ's, or anyone else's thread, after the game, and make such an " arrogant statement".  Hope you made a lot of money on the game, because you might need it to buy back some of the lost respect.  Don't know if you can put a price on that.  BOL

You beat me to it

 

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.