I haven't backed Wisconsin so far, but they have covered the opening line in both games. I grabbed -16 here, so we'll see. Guess I'll be against you on Maryland too.
Best of luck this week, especially on Clemson and Illinois (and Army, if you pull the trigger there).
The opening line, OK, but maybe 10% of bettors see the opening line. Most saw the 34.5 or 35 that I took with UNLV.
I took Army at 7.5. Its a shitty line, but again, its all that was offered to me. Not sure if I keep it, though.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Arid_Torpor:
I haven't backed Wisconsin so far, but they have covered the opening line in both games. I grabbed -16 here, so we'll see. Guess I'll be against you on Maryland too.
Best of luck this week, especially on Clemson and Illinois (and Army, if you pull the trigger there).
The opening line, OK, but maybe 10% of bettors see the opening line. Most saw the 34.5 or 35 that I took with UNLV.
I took Army at 7.5. Its a shitty line, but again, its all that was offered to me. Not sure if I keep it, though.
Alright, RJ, you've talked me out of Wisconsin. Now have the Badgers -16 and the Huskies +17.5. Let's go 17 point game! Really appreciate the thoughts/discussion. And I'm still tailing you in a couple spots and fading you in a couple spots, so hopefully the trend of losing every play where I tail you ends here. BOL
0
Alright, RJ, you've talked me out of Wisconsin. Now have the Badgers -16 and the Huskies +17.5. Let's go 17 point game! Really appreciate the thoughts/discussion. And I'm still tailing you in a couple spots and fading you in a couple spots, so hopefully the trend of losing every play where I tail you ends here. BOL
I took Army at 7.5. Its a shitty line, but again, its all that was offered to me. Not sure if I keep it, though.
I've got Army +8, but it's down to 7 now, so the line you have is better than the current going rate. Even 8 is too short, and I do love Northwestern this year, but they're just not a very good road favorite.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RJSizzle:
I took Army at 7.5. Its a shitty line, but again, its all that was offered to me. Not sure if I keep it, though.
I've got Army +8, but it's down to 7 now, so the line you have is better than the current going rate. Even 8 is too short, and I do love Northwestern this year, but they're just not a very good road favorite.
Alright, RJ, you've talked me out of Wisconsin. Now have the Badgers -16 and the Huskies +17.5. Let's go 17 point game! Really appreciate the thoughts/discussion. And I'm still tailing you in a couple spots and fading you in a couple spots, so hopefully the trend of losing every play where I tail you ends here. BOL
That is always a terrible thing but sometimes it goes the other way too and you have 9-1 days.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Arid_Torpor:
Alright, RJ, you've talked me out of Wisconsin. Now have the Badgers -16 and the Huskies +17.5. Let's go 17 point game! Really appreciate the thoughts/discussion. And I'm still tailing you in a couple spots and fading you in a couple spots, so hopefully the trend of losing every play where I tail you ends here. BOL
That is always a terrible thing but sometimes it goes the other way too and you have 9-1 days.
There is no need for profanity here. We can disagree but keep it on a higher level
Zook is 28-45 at Illinois 38% do you call that good ?
He lost 14 games in 3 years at florida, Meyer lost 15 in 6 years and won 2 national titles
That's not even bringing in Spurrier
We really just arent on the same page....let me explain again...
You are a fan. You are talking about guys are good if they get your team wins and you can celebrate with your friends. I dont care about that. I dont care about wins or losses. I am not a fan.
I care about if he covers when he is supposed to. And that he does.
The whole his record at Illy stat is also bogus. Do you know the depths that program reached before he was there? Do you know how he turned around the recruiting? Remove head from anus.
Again, Zook is a good coach, imo, because he covers when he should. I dont care about whether they went 10-1 or 1-10.
This is my opinion. You dont need to care so much about it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jordyn31:
There is no need for profanity here. We can disagree but keep it on a higher level
Zook is 28-45 at Illinois 38% do you call that good ?
He lost 14 games in 3 years at florida, Meyer lost 15 in 6 years and won 2 national titles
That's not even bringing in Spurrier
We really just arent on the same page....let me explain again...
You are a fan. You are talking about guys are good if they get your team wins and you can celebrate with your friends. I dont care about that. I dont care about wins or losses. I am not a fan.
I care about if he covers when he is supposed to. And that he does.
The whole his record at Illy stat is also bogus. Do you know the depths that program reached before he was there? Do you know how he turned around the recruiting? Remove head from anus.
Again, Zook is a good coach, imo, because he covers when he should. I dont care about whether they went 10-1 or 1-10.
This is my opinion. You dont need to care so much about it.
Alright, RJ, you've talked me out of Wisconsin. Now have the Badgers -16 and the Huskies +17.5. Let's go 17 point game! Really appreciate the thoughts/discussion. And I'm still tailing you in a couple spots and fading you in a couple spots, so hopefully the trend of losing every play where I tail you ends here. BOL
I saw that post in the other thread - no matter if you tail or fade, you lose. As gamblers, we should be wondering the odds on that!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Arid_Torpor:
Alright, RJ, you've talked me out of Wisconsin. Now have the Badgers -16 and the Huskies +17.5. Let's go 17 point game! Really appreciate the thoughts/discussion. And I'm still tailing you in a couple spots and fading you in a couple spots, so hopefully the trend of losing every play where I tail you ends here. BOL
I saw that post in the other thread - no matter if you tail or fade, you lose. As gamblers, we should be wondering the odds on that!
Do you like the under tonight in the LSU-MSU game? Both teams have shitty Qbs and both teams will load the box to stop the run. I see the clock running all night and the game ending up somewhere around 20-14. It should be tough sledding tonight for both teams to run the ball when there is no deep threat because of weak QB play.
0
Sizzle,
Do you like the under tonight in the LSU-MSU game? Both teams have shitty Qbs and both teams will load the box to stop the run. I see the clock running all night and the game ending up somewhere around 20-14. It should be tough sledding tonight for both teams to run the ball when there is no deep threat because of weak QB play.
We really just arent on the same page....let me explain again...
You are a fan. You are talking about guys are good if they get your team wins and you can celebrate with your friends. I dont care about that. I dont care about wins or losses. I am not a fan.
I care about if he covers when he is supposed to. And that he does.
The whole his record at Illy stat is also bogus. Do you know the depths that program reached before he was there? Do you know how he turned around the recruiting? Remove head from anus.
Again, Zook is a good coach, imo, because he covers when he should. I dont care about whether they went 10-1 or 1-10.
This is my opinion. You dont need to care so much about it.
I love it
0
Quote Originally Posted by RJSizzle:
We really just arent on the same page....let me explain again...
You are a fan. You are talking about guys are good if they get your team wins and you can celebrate with your friends. I dont care about that. I dont care about wins or losses. I am not a fan.
I care about if he covers when he is supposed to. And that he does.
The whole his record at Illy stat is also bogus. Do you know the depths that program reached before he was there? Do you know how he turned around the recruiting? Remove head from anus.
Again, Zook is a good coach, imo, because he covers when he should. I dont care about whether they went 10-1 or 1-10.
This is my opinion. You dont need to care so much about it.
Philadelphia. They play @ Lincoln Financial Field.
Been to the games. Penn State fans will out number Temple.
I understand that, but to me Temple wins this game outright. State doesn't have a QB and Temple is ready to take the headlines away. Stunned this is now below 7 past few hours, dropped a point everywhere.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Kraze:
Philadelphia. They play @ Lincoln Financial Field.
Been to the games. Penn State fans will out number Temple.
I understand that, but to me Temple wins this game outright. State doesn't have a QB and Temple is ready to take the headlines away. Stunned this is now below 7 past few hours, dropped a point everywhere.
LOL...I dont have anything against you. Just thought the whole Train thing was stalkerish. But I realized, you are all boys and its sort of fun to pick on someone. I was just getting in some shit that I really had no business to.
Shit, if we met we'd probably like each other. Sometimes peoples internet persona rubs others the wrong way.
GL with your plays Sims.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sims_key:
not that you care, but i'll be on all those.
LOL...I dont have anything against you. Just thought the whole Train thing was stalkerish. But I realized, you are all boys and its sort of fun to pick on someone. I was just getting in some shit that I really had no business to.
Shit, if we met we'd probably like each other. Sometimes peoples internet persona rubs others the wrong way.
Where is Temple? That might be the best play this week. GL.
Sort of think its a gigantic fucking bear trap. Penn State looks like dick on National TV and everyone won betting against.
I like Temple at 12.5 and 11, 10, shit, even at 9. But 6.5? Holy Shit.
Taking Temple now would be the squarest thing in the world. I just cant let a bookie offer everyone else such great lines and be willing to eat shit at a bad line. I would kick myself sitting there Saturday with a 6.5 when I couldve been hanging out with my good old friend two scores (+10).
Looking forward to your thread.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:
Where is Temple? That might be the best play this week. GL.
Sort of think its a gigantic fucking bear trap. Penn State looks like dick on National TV and everyone won betting against.
I like Temple at 12.5 and 11, 10, shit, even at 9. But 6.5? Holy Shit.
Taking Temple now would be the squarest thing in the world. I just cant let a bookie offer everyone else such great lines and be willing to eat shit at a bad line. I would kick myself sitting there Saturday with a 6.5 when I couldve been hanging out with my good old friend two scores (+10).
Hope you're wrong about Wisky and Stanford... I hate that you went the other way on those...
Whisky -16
Stanford -4 teaser with BYU Pick
BOL to you anyways sir.
Its just my style. I find that going against the big name squads you get better value.
I used to play the big favorites, but after a year of paying my bookie, I knew I had to adjust. I was playing the teams that always looked good. But I was always behind the curve. I am just trying to stay ahead of it.
Its worked for me. It might not work for everyone.
GL Tap, Tap, Tappy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Tappy:
Hope you're wrong about Wisky and Stanford... I hate that you went the other way on those...
Whisky -16
Stanford -4 teaser with BYU Pick
BOL to you anyways sir.
Its just my style. I find that going against the big name squads you get better value.
I used to play the big favorites, but after a year of paying my bookie, I knew I had to adjust. I was playing the teams that always looked good. But I was always behind the curve. I am just trying to stay ahead of it.
Its worked for me. It might not work for everyone.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
...
I love it
Hot Forum Topics
