My 0.002 here is about as valuable as my new post count will allow but i have been around for years just changed accounts due to several reasons...anyways, here nor there. Just wanted to say I am with SJSU totally here. Seems as though my methods of capping are a bit unorthodox compared to others myself. I look at "spots" and the number tagged it opens with. SJSU opening only as 3 point dogs....ridiculous. Clearly a public fav.....even the small sample says so here at covers. with a 75% in the consensus. That being said, I am with you on this one. Hammering the side +3.5 and the ml. Like your ideas bro....
My 0.002 here is about as valuable as my new post count will allow but i have been around for years just changed accounts due to several reasons...anyways, here nor there. Just wanted to say I am with SJSU totally here. Seems as though my methods of capping are a bit unorthodox compared to others myself. I look at "spots" and the number tagged it opens with. SJSU opening only as 3 point dogs....ridiculous. Clearly a public fav.....even the small sample says so here at covers. with a 75% in the consensus. That being said, I am with you on this one. Hammering the side +3.5 and the ml. Like your ideas bro....
But it doesn't always work.
I remember the Bama-Vols game in 1996 when a 4-1 Tennessee team was inexplicably favored by 14.5 over a 7-0 Alabama team. I had several friends -- Mississippi boys -- who made their first-ever bet on that game to take advantage of the free money the books were giving away.
And we all cleaned up. The game was never in doubt. That still may be the most baffling line I've ever encountered.
But it doesn't always work.
I remember the Bama-Vols game in 1996 when a 4-1 Tennessee team was inexplicably favored by 14.5 over a 7-0 Alabama team. I had several friends -- Mississippi boys -- who made their first-ever bet on that game to take advantage of the free money the books were giving away.
And we all cleaned up. The game was never in doubt. That still may be the most baffling line I've ever encountered.
But the point is that sometimes Vegas puts out really bad lines that even the most casual handicapper can identify. And that may be the case with the GT/NCSU line. The oddsmakers understandably underrated GT coming into the season, but they also inexcusably overrated NC State.
They've been adjusting the power rating downward each week, but they haven't been able to catch up because of the injuries. I don't know what's going to happen, but I think GT is the right side.
But the point is that sometimes Vegas puts out really bad lines that even the most casual handicapper can identify. And that may be the case with the GT/NCSU line. The oddsmakers understandably underrated GT coming into the season, but they also inexcusably overrated NC State.
They've been adjusting the power rating downward each week, but they haven't been able to catch up because of the injuries. I don't know what's going to happen, but I think GT is the right side.
WESTERN MICH +120 ALABAMA v FLORIDA u45 -140 (B1.5) DUKE +150 OPEN PLAY 50 TO WIN 850 |
WESTERN MICH +120 ALABAMA v FLORIDA u45 -140 (B1.5) DUKE +150 OPEN PLAY 50 TO WIN 850 |
But it doesn't always work.
I remember the Bama-Vols game in 1996 when a 4-1 Tennessee team was inexplicably favored by 14.5 over a 7-0 Alabama team. I had several friends -- Mississippi boys -- who made their first-ever bet on that game to take advantage of the free money the books were giving away.
And we all cleaned up. The game was never in doubt. That still may be the most baffling line I've ever encountered.
But it doesn't always work.
I remember the Bama-Vols game in 1996 when a 4-1 Tennessee team was inexplicably favored by 14.5 over a 7-0 Alabama team. I had several friends -- Mississippi boys -- who made their first-ever bet on that game to take advantage of the free money the books were giving away.
And we all cleaned up. The game was never in doubt. That still may be the most baffling line I've ever encountered.
This is it....although I might buy out of Michigan State. Getting a bad feeling.
I really Michigan State this week. I think they will win straight up. Going to play both the plus point and ML.
GL today RJ
This is it....although I might buy out of Michigan State. Getting a bad feeling.
I really Michigan State this week. I think they will win straight up. Going to play both the plus point and ML.
GL today RJ
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.