All Forums | College Football

Dear Texas - San Antonio bettors,

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 5007
Posts: 60
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 78
Posted: #1
You clearly are either not looking into the finer details and/or are lacking information. 
If you want to throw your money away on bad lines, then take the money and go give it to a homeless person. That would be better then giving it to your sportsbook.

Arizona should be favoured by two touchdowns but, with a small spread the public was tricked into betting an underdog coming off an upset win.

Beating Houston was hardly an upset. Even when you take way all of the turnovers, it was an even game.

Arizona -7 for the win!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 140
Posted: #2
  Let's get em tonight!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 2685
Posted: #3
lol I love posts like this.  Clearly it's your ignorance not looking at the personnel that Arizona is actually returning, compared to a stacked UTSA defense.

Clearly you don't know Coker's stranglehold he has on everything that is Rich Rod.

Subscribing to the "this team is Arizona and I never heard of the other one, so this is obvious," could get your bank account killed out there.  Better bring extra ammo. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 4542
Posted: #4
UTSA  ML
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 78
Posted: #5
Arizona by 17 touchdowns. since you guys are throwing around crazy bets in taking Texas - San Antonio I threw one back at you.

Ha
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 144
Posted: #6
UTSA outright - this will playout just like the North Dakota State game over Iowa State. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 115
Posted: #7
www.thespread.com is showing the Market Average is 72% on Arizona...

Don't think I follow your logic that Books Tricked the public by keeping the line low to entice UTSA Bets??  Seems like it's done the opposite 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 78
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by Currigan:

www.thespread.com is showing the Market Average is 72% on Arizona...

Don't think I follow your logic that Books Tricked the public by keeping the line low to entice UTSA Bets??  Seems like it's done the opposite 

They set a low spread to have the public thinking "this is another upset winner". They have you thinking you know something and all of these sports websites are telling you how everyone is on Arizona when they are not. The money is nearly dead even. But apparently 70-80 percent of the money is on Arizona.

Those Texas - San Antonio bettors are on Seattle in the NFL too I am guessing. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 6618
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by Rayapova:


They set a low spread to have the public thinking "this is another upset winner". They have you thinking you know something and all of these sports websites are telling you how everyone is on Arizona when they are not. The money is nearly dead even. But apparently 70-80 percent of the money is on Arizona.

Those Texas - San Antonio bettors are on Seattle in the NFL too I am guessing. 


No.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 2000
Posted: #10
clearly you just see a big name program like ARIZONA and think who is utsa, and like 75 percent of the public you think its to easy of a bet and cash your fake ticket before you even bet it. GL on your bet but dont be ignorant when you know nothing about UTSA
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 3514
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by Rayapova:

You clearly are either not looking into the finer details and/or are lacking information. 
If you want to throw your money away on bad lines, then take the money and go give it to a homeless person. That would be better then giving it to your sportsbook.

Arizona should be favoured by two touchdowns but, with a small spread the public was tricked into betting an underdog coming off an upset win.

Beating Houston was hardly an upset. Even when you take way all of the turnovers, it was an even game.

Arizona -7 for the win!
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I think you have it behind backwards about the line. It's just like Vegas to make us think it's an easy number to cover...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 78
Posted: #12
Everyone is on Arizona hey? Look how many are against them in this thread alone. lol wake up!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 78
Posted: #13
Telling someone that they are ignorant and then telling them what you assume they |"know" is a highly ironic statement.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 115
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by Rayapova:

Everyone is on Arizona hey? Look how many are against them in this thread alone. lol wake up!

Wow... This is hard for me to wrap my head around.. You're basing the Betting Public on this Thread?  I feel like if you go to the front page of the NCAA Forum, there are 5 or more saying something like Zona All Night!!!

I get where you're coming from to a certain degree but your logic is flawed... Vegas Books are in biz for a reason.  I understand they set lines to try and get 50/50 on each team but one thing they don't do is keep a line low to entice Underdog Betting!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 78
Posted: #15
I know nothing about sports betting, winning is due to that excuse people love to use so much called "luck". I am stupid. I will win this game but, it was fixed for Arizona. The refs favoured Arizona. (insert additional excuses as to why Arizona won)


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 115
Posted: #16
Game is fixed by the books??

So AZ should be favored by what, 14.... So the books want to keep the line lower than this # so that the Betting Public (over 70%) hammer the line and walk away with House Money??


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 486
Posted: #17
Haha good luck. Usta ML
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 5107
Posted: #18
HOU lost one of it's best OL, Zach Johnson which obviously hurts their offense. I think that's the biggest reason why they lost to UTSA.
I studied up on UTSA. They are about earning $$$. They have a bunch of jocks who can't read!!! hehe
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 8093
Posted: #19
Home Dog plus 7 points or more on Thursday Night; You got to take it at the heart beat!!!!....USTA + 8 .....to cover. We dont care the Arizona are on PAC 12 and lay only single digit....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 78
Posted: #20
Everyone is on Texas - San Antonio. Just like they are on Seattle -5.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 78
Posted: #21
My "documented" and posted picks are Arizona -7, Green Bay +5.5, Cleveland +114 MLB and St. Louis -108 MLB.

People talk all of this information and show no results. Document it or take a step back.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2014
Posts: 761
Posted: #22
I'm stuck everyone taking UTSA + 7, if you look at the stats from last week they forced 6 turnovers with a total yardage of 263, whilst Arizona only had the 1 turnover but there offence rolled through a mountain of work with 787 yards. Will Arizona be able to move the ball up and down more then UTSA and create more scoring opportunities and cover the -7?
Good luck all
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 78
Posted: #23
Arizona -7 and the under as I do not see UTSA scoring much at all.

This is going to be a 34-10 type of game.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2014
Posts: 82
Posted: #24
Agreed with Arizona being the play tonight.  I don't get all the Coker love and UTSA has a freshman qb that didn't show me anything last week.  I'll take AZ -6.5 on the road.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 3051
Posted: #25

Arizona is taking  a freshman QB on the road for the first time.....turf will be fast in the Alamodome, so look for AU to run it early on to take the pressure off of the QB.

UTSA will run it as well in an attempt to make the game short.  Last season UTSA gave Oklahoma St fits in the first half of that matchup before OSU pulled away..... I look for the same type of thing here.

Most likely, this number lands on a clean 7 and burns late Zona backers, and doesn't pay early UTSA players. 

BUT, at this point UTSA is healthy, and AU has a freshman QB. That is whey the number is where it is....anything can happen here....worth a shot at the +250 ML for UTSA.

Never Make A Winner A Loser. Never.
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.