All Forums | College Football

Ex Pro & Bookie on Rutgers Today

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 13740
Posts: 132
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2006
Posts: 18880
Posted: #26
rutgers squad sik as dogs getting fluids as u spk,..iowa st huge
bigFnPOO
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2006
Posts: 18880
Posted: #27
home locker room just got a gross of depends deliv....TEAMSTERS are men,,...if we had men on this site instead of juvenile fkn homotalkers we make more $....ex  gilmos bookie  having 60.5  we wouldve had a chance to rape him  but we are all fkn idiots talking about shit in 3rd grade nay 1st grade 
bigFnPOO
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 2667
Posted: #28
Didn't he hit his pick last night?? Damn so many hatin ass kids around here........Let the man make his picks. GL Lock
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 191
Posted: #29
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 3124
Posted: #30
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 554
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by LocksmithSports:



It's called a let down game.  They just dominated Cincinnati's "shitty" offense the week before to the tune of 3 points and were riding high.  I don't put too much stock in it.  Happens to everyone.

Collaros DNP in this game. 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 74
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by shark_apreza:


I would address all of your points, but you just say stuff without any kind of reasoning.  You claim "ISU played the teams that do have defense, so nothing is wrong."  huh?  I'm not even gonna address the rest of it.

Iowa State scored 26 points vs Baylor.  As you saw last night, the only way Baylor could stop Washington was by the quarters ending.  Only Stephen F. Austin and Texas scored less points on Baylor than Iowa State did.  

Texas A&M gives up 35 points a game.  Iowa mustered 17 on them.  
Kansas has the worst defense in college football and Iowa State scored 13 on them.

Oklahoma gives up 22 a game.  Iowa State scored 6.

I'm pretty sure there were only 1 or 2 teams on ISU's schedule where they scored more points than what the opposing defense allows per game on average.  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 3561
Posted: #33
damn! I just flipped a coin and it came up Rutgers... guess my Iowa St. play is a loser.......
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #34
gonna dress a few posts here, including a couple addressed to me...

Post #9... how could the UConn game have been a letdown game when Rutgers was playing for a chance at a BCS game???

Post #14... Rutgers is awful because they have one of the stupidest QBs i have ever witnessed... the guy is a mental invalid!  under no circumstances would i ever bet on a team led by a QB that bad in a bowl game...

Post #16... a pro move is understanding the importance of conference strength when it comes time to bet the Bowls!  Big 12 vs. Big East... you can bet on the Big 12 team, or stay away... betting on Rutgers is not a pro move here...

Post #19... key point made here by Shark... Rutgers has respectable defensive stats because they play against teams with horseshit offenses... if you are really buying that they have a great D, you are not looking deeply enough... which again, doesn't come across as a pro move...



just my opinion... not always right!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 2410
Posted: #35
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 16326
Posted: #36
IS RUTGERS TEAM SICK FOR REAL? OR WAS THAT JUST B.S
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 2780
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by FearTheWeb:

I say let him pick, whats the big deal. Put together some wins.

Best Of Luck Locksmith

Let him pick all he wants......It's the "Self-Proclaimed", delusional pro-move horseshit folks don't like to hear.....A little humility is the classy move....Show the 65% first then the praise from others will follow.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 836
Posted: #38
LOL its funny how people try to sh!t on his pick just because youre on the other side.. His pick is just as valid as anyone else..
Im leaning RU as well but havent pulled the trigger yet..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2004
Posts: 1330
Posted: #39

this is so funny

a newbie posting like we should listen??
all I heaR IS IOWA STATE HUGE NOw!!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2004
Posts: 1330
Posted: #40

WHAT SOMETIMES MAKE THESE SITES A JOKE

WHO WOULD LISTEN WO ANYONE HWO JUST JOINED HERE?

ALL THEY WANT IS FOR US TO PLAY RUTGERS

AND WHEN THE DUST SETTLES

CYCLONES WILL SCREW RUTGERS IN THE ASS

THANKS FOR POSTING STUFF LIKE THIS

MAKE ME 100% SURE OF BETTING IOWA STATE NOW

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 33154
Posted: #41
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 1930
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by zmanpga:

this is so funny

a newbie posting like we should listen??
all I heaR IS IOWA STATE HUGE NOw!!



What makes a 'newbie' any less qualified than someone who has been around awhile?  99% of the people that post on these forums do not profit in a season.

How about we see how he does before we start casting stones?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 362
Posted: #43
Im pulling for RUTGERS. A home game pretty much and they have a hell of a coach!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2004
Posts: 1330
Posted: #44
Rutgers supposedly have a nice deffense, but any decent teams should have their stats padded against the mediocre teams Rutgers had faced, besides, they just let Uconn rape them, and had allowed tons of pts to superior athletic teams like WVGA, and actually had allowed many pts to everybody, iowa st its not a stellar team either, but what can we expect of a team that faces Baylor,Oksst,OU,Kssst,Texas,TaM, thats a tough schedule,so the clones are far more battle tested, and besides how cant i side with the team that beat Okst, this kids come out and play, and if they do so, it will be a long ugly day for rutgers
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2004
Posts: 1330
Posted: #45
Migger, YOUR LAYING THE GOLF CLUB OFF!!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 74
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:

gonna dress a few posts here, including a couple addressed to me...

Post #9... how could the UConn game have been a letdown game when Rutgers was playing for a chance at a BCS game???

Post #14... Rutgers is awful because they have one of the stupidest QBs i have ever witnessed... the guy is a mental invalid!  under no circumstances would i ever bet on a team led by a QB that bad in a bowl game...

Post #16... a pro move is understanding the importance of conference strength when it comes time to bet the Bowls!  Big 12 vs. Big East... you can bet on the Big 12 team, or stay away... betting on Rutgers is not a pro move here...

Post #19... key point made here by Shark... Rutgers has respectable defensive stats because they play against teams with horseshit offenses... if you are really buying that they have a great D, you are not looking deeply enough... which again, doesn't come across as a pro move...



just my opinion... not always right!

1.  A let down is human element.  When you think you are invincible, you usually aren't - regardless of the stakes.  Just ask Nebraska vs Washington in their bowl game, Ohio State vs. Florida in 2007 and more.

2.  Valid point.  But Rutgers defense is better and will make Iowa State's Joe Montana, oops I mean freshman... look like a freshman.  You guys make Iowa State's freshman QB sound like he is Andrew Luck.

3.  The public bets on conference vs. conference.  The public bets on QBs.  I field bets everyday, and before these guys put the bet in I know they are betting on the better conference team or the better QB every time.  SEC vs. Big 12.  They bet SEC - everytime.  SEC is a .500 conf ATS because they are overvalued and I win the juice.  That's not how you bet.  Each game has matchups.  Trends get broken every day.  I guess the MAC being 0-100 in bowl games lately meant I should have faded Temple this bowl season right?  Would have been a "pro" move.  MAC vs Mountain West.  Mountain West everytime.  Please don't lecture me on square ideals and tell me what the pro moves are.  I've been doing this for almost 20 years.

4.  How do you know how deeply I have looked into Rutgers defense?  Maybe I have broken their defense down for the past 6 years at the professional level.  Maybe Mel Kiper is my ugly nephew.  You are assuming too much when you really don't know how much I've broken them down.  You simply think Rutgers defense isn't good because of the offenses they have played.  Wow.  There's some in depth research.  I can't believe I never thought of that.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 74
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by poolman11:

IM KINDA LIKING THIS NEWBIE TO FORUMS

WELCOME A BOARD

WHEN THE DUST SETTLES I HOPE YOU CONTINUED SUCCESS


Thanks, I hope we all continue to win money over the marathon
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 74
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by joewashington:

Let him pick all he wants......It's the "Self-Proclaimed", delusional pro-move horseshit folks don't like to hear.....A little humility is the classy move....Show the 65% first then the praise from others will follow.


I never brought it up.  I gave 3 sentences of my background and am getting challenged every 5 seconds and I am answering the posts.  I'm just sharing plays with a brief reason why.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 994
Posted: #49

why all the hate....I like the fact that we have someone coming from the dark side and look forward to ur views/picks.

GL today

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 125
Posted: #50
Lock, keep doing what you do.  There are always haters out there. 

This game is a virtual home game for Rutgers. They are expecting 25,000 at the stadium. Rutgers campus is only 50 miles away. I know that means nothing but I will take the points with the Scarlet Knights. 
Good luck. 
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.