^ High probability of occuring.
^ High probability of occuring.
^ High probability of occuring.
A. If he was on ANOTHER 12-0 team playing for the NC he would be on the Heisman ticket. Remember that is why he is on it because he plays for a 12-0 team.
B. If he was on ANOTHER 12-0 Team they would know his name.
C. Tell Kiper and McShay who have him as the 2nd and 4th best OVERALL for the draft GEEEEEEEZ
He is on the ticket because he is a great player and he is on a 12-0 team that is the number one defense in the country. Seriously do you know anything about college football and how it works. You are so clueless it's beyond comprehesion. Its why I never go into your threads they are all attention grabbing threads that have nothing to do with gambling. Have you posted any picks I know you like Bama, OU and Kstate. I have you down for those right.
A. If he was on ANOTHER 12-0 team playing for the NC he would be on the Heisman ticket. Remember that is why he is on it because he plays for a 12-0 team.
B. If he was on ANOTHER 12-0 Team they would know his name.
C. Tell Kiper and McShay who have him as the 2nd and 4th best OVERALL for the draft GEEEEEEEZ
He is on the ticket because he is a great player and he is on a 12-0 team that is the number one defense in the country. Seriously do you know anything about college football and how it works. You are so clueless it's beyond comprehesion. Its why I never go into your threads they are all attention grabbing threads that have nothing to do with gambling. Have you posted any picks I know you like Bama, OU and Kstate. I have you down for those right.
You don't know anything about college football as far as it comes to picking games Mr. 500. Also with the exception of RG3 who put up video game numbers how many Heisman winners or people that get invited comes from LOSING TEAMS. RG3 didn't have a defense he had to win the game by himself. Give me ONE NAME of a winner or someone invited for the Heisman that wasn't from not only a winning team but a team that is basically in the NC hunt??? Cat got your tongue. Your arguement is so ridiculous its comical. If SC was undefeated and he was coming off that monster game against weak behind Clemson he would have been in the Heisman chase. PERIOD. CASE CLOSED. You know it and everyone else knows it. So keep making useless threads I am still waiting on you to actually pick a college football game. You like to fade me so I have you down for Bama, OU and of course your darling team Kstate who is going to get HOUSED. GL on your picks
You don't know anything about college football as far as it comes to picking games Mr. 500. Also with the exception of RG3 who put up video game numbers how many Heisman winners or people that get invited comes from LOSING TEAMS. RG3 didn't have a defense he had to win the game by himself. Give me ONE NAME of a winner or someone invited for the Heisman that wasn't from not only a winning team but a team that is basically in the NC hunt??? Cat got your tongue. Your arguement is so ridiculous its comical. If SC was undefeated and he was coming off that monster game against weak behind Clemson he would have been in the Heisman chase. PERIOD. CASE CLOSED. You know it and everyone else knows it. So keep making useless threads I am still waiting on you to actually pick a college football game. You like to fade me so I have you down for Bama, OU and of course your darling team Kstate who is going to get HOUSED. GL on your picks
These comments take the cake though. They were not 12-0 because of him. Of course they were not. This isn't tennis no 1 person wins a football game. Scheduling???? They beat OU AT HOME, beat Stanford PERIOD and USC AT HOME. Their Strength of Schedule was better than Alabamas so give me a break. As far a conference championship Bama needed that to get into the NC game they had only played 2 good teams before that and Georgia lit them up like Christmas tree. Bama never played in the conference championship last year. Also you do know that ND is an independant. Just checking. Seriously Ipromise you that this will be the last thread I ever go into of yours because debating you is like debating Bozo. You think your opinions are facts while I debate with ACTUAL FACTS. I don't like ND I like to win. Your problem is you are so biased towards various teams it clouts your judgement just like BOOB. You were on Clemson over SC also and saw Clowney clown that team. Check you later can't wait for those other 30 picks. What's your record now?????
These comments take the cake though. They were not 12-0 because of him. Of course they were not. This isn't tennis no 1 person wins a football game. Scheduling???? They beat OU AT HOME, beat Stanford PERIOD and USC AT HOME. Their Strength of Schedule was better than Alabamas so give me a break. As far a conference championship Bama needed that to get into the NC game they had only played 2 good teams before that and Georgia lit them up like Christmas tree. Bama never played in the conference championship last year. Also you do know that ND is an independant. Just checking. Seriously Ipromise you that this will be the last thread I ever go into of yours because debating you is like debating Bozo. You think your opinions are facts while I debate with ACTUAL FACTS. I don't like ND I like to win. Your problem is you are so biased towards various teams it clouts your judgement just like BOOB. You were on Clemson over SC also and saw Clowney clown that team. Check you later can't wait for those other 30 picks. What's your record now?????
You don't know anything about college football as far as it comes to picking games Mr. 500. Also with the exception of RG3 who put up video game numbers how many Heisman winners or people that get invited comes from LOSING TEAMS. RG3 didn't have a defense he had to win the game by himself. Give me ONE NAME of a winner or someone invited for the Heisman that wasn't from not only a winning team but a team that is basically in the NC hunt??? Cat got your tongue. Your arguement is so ridiculous its comical. If SC was undefeated and he was coming off that monster game against weak behind Clemson he would have been in the Heisman chase. PERIOD. CASE CLOSED. You know it and everyone else knows it. So keep making useless threads I am still waiting on you to actually pick a college football game. You like to fade me so I have you down for Bama, OU and of course your darling team Kstate who is going to get HOUSED. GL on your picks
You don't know anything about college football as far as it comes to picking games Mr. 500. Also with the exception of RG3 who put up video game numbers how many Heisman winners or people that get invited comes from LOSING TEAMS. RG3 didn't have a defense he had to win the game by himself. Give me ONE NAME of a winner or someone invited for the Heisman that wasn't from not only a winning team but a team that is basically in the NC hunt??? Cat got your tongue. Your arguement is so ridiculous its comical. If SC was undefeated and he was coming off that monster game against weak behind Clemson he would have been in the Heisman chase. PERIOD. CASE CLOSED. You know it and everyone else knows it. So keep making useless threads I am still waiting on you to actually pick a college football game. You like to fade me so I have you down for Bama, OU and of course your darling team Kstate who is going to get HOUSED. GL on your picks
Train, I respect you as a capper but you act like you forgot about last year too. Teo would have been a #1 draft pick if he came out then. So, unlike Barkley, he came back for Sr season and produced. Of course he should be hyped. Top 5 college player this year. Name me a LB that will be drafted before him.
Train, I respect you as a capper but you act like you forgot about last year too. Teo would have been a #1 draft pick if he came out then. So, unlike Barkley, he came back for Sr season and produced. Of course he should be hyped. Top 5 college player this year. Name me a LB that will be drafted before him.
Never said he was going to win. I said Manziel would most likely win, but Te'o should win. Big difference.
Never said he was going to win. I said Manziel would most likely win, but Te'o should win. Big difference.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.