All Forums | College Football

IF you guys dont think the SEC was trying to protect Alabama, well, then you are just stupid

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 5772
Posts: 81
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 16408
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by broller:

If the player's toe is in bounds, but his heel is out of bounds, it's an out of bounds/incomplete play.

That was the correct call.

+1

boom...once again bro...you should look up the rules before you guess.

i hate bama though...so glad they lost.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 3099
Posted: #27
college sports is the most corrupt, clearly the refs were on bamas side
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 16408
Posted: #28
also, that last penalty could have gone either way.  but obviously the refs weren't scared of winning the game for a&m.

i thought it was an excellently called game.

i just don't get these conspiracy theories...dime a dozen.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 606
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by sims_key:

also, that last penalty could have gone either way.  but obviously the refs weren't scared of winning the game for a&m.

i thought it was an excellently called game.

i just don't get these conspiracy theories...dime a dozen.

I am die hard Aggie fan and a season ticket holder.  I couldn't agree with you more.  I thought the game was called fairly and that interception was called correctly.  Not sure why Boom thinks it was called so poorly.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 16408
Posted: #30
yeah i agree numero.

conspiracies...

even if there are, how would you know when and where.  it's all guessing anyway, but everyone acts like they know.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 3066
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by dburgett1234:

lol watch the nebraska play that guy looked like he had no control of the ball at the 3 let a lone the goal line and how in god's name would you ever over rule that.  (IN reality that would of been very debatable if the called it a td but it wasn't even close with the fact they called it a fumble)  Yes i am a husker fan and we are a solid team with crazy potential but we love to give the ball away at ridiculous times but that was clearly a fumble (spiel man does hate us for the way we play yes i will agree with that.....we pretty much have crazy potential but piss drives down our leg/get horrible penalties and he just gets nutso about dumb penalties/turnovers and none does it better than nebraska!)

you are delsuional man, how did he lose posession if he had two hands on the ball stretching over the goal line with it......numerous publications have called it the worst call of 2012 and your team got bs calls in lansing the week previous.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 2667
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

Alabama got so many calls that game.


The No interception call....Are you fucking kidding me?????? the guy's foot was clearly in bounds.




Oh my goodness..... just wait until the ten things we learned tomorrow.

Florida 


Boom love your threads but learn the rules bro. 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 16408
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by TopHog:



Boom love your threads but learn the rules bro. 

+1
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1334
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by dburgett1234:

lol watch the nebraska play that guy looked like he had no control of the ball at the 3 let a lone the goal line and how in god's name would you ever over rule that.  (IN reality that would of been very debatable if the called it a td but it wasn't even close with the fact they called it a fumble)  Yes i am a husker fan and we are a solid team with crazy potential but we love to give the ball away at ridiculous times but that was clearly a fumble (spiel man does hate us for the way we play yes i will agree with that.....we pretty much have crazy potential but piss drives down our leg/get horrible penalties and he just gets nutso about dumb penalties/turnovers and none does it better than nebraska!)
Wow, your obviously a husker fan! Your delusional if you think that was a fumble, period
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 784
Posted: #35
I guess nobody on here everplayed. I did. There is no fixes, no conspicary theories. Its called being human. Mistakes happen. Anyone who played knows its not fixed enough with this BS
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2003
Posts: 12648
Posted: #36

Anybody saying there's no fixes or conspiracies hatched by conference officials are either kids or just don't watch the games.The West Virginia vs Pitt game back in 2007 was a clear example of officials trying to fix a game in favor of a team to get that conference a share of a BCS Championship game check. Pitt ended up winning, but there were at LEAST five horrific calls that favored WVU because they were guaranteed to get to the  BCS title contest with a win. See, what bettors tend to not notice is that many fixes have nothing to do with gambling. It all has to do with MONEY

That's most likely what Boom was alluding to. I disagree with his analysis of the calls in this Alabama game, but I absolutely know where he's coming from and why.

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 15756
Posted: #37
does he not say that Al was getting calls and still lost?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2003
Posts: 12648
Posted: #38
And WVU was favored by like 27 or something in that game I noted so that's what I mean by "nothing to do with gambling." Lots of 49er games in the late 90's and Packer games in the early 2000's were fixed in their favor because the NFL wanted to give back to Debartolo for certain favors and to get Favre into the playoffs at any cost due to his popularity. Texas got an extra second put back on the clock (verrry questionable) in the Big 12 title game against Nebraska a few years back so the Big 12 would get a share of that BCS title game check
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 423
Posted: #39
cbbowles.....u r full of shit and more if you think that a
"business" as multi billion as the ncaff is not controlled by big money, then u believe in santa claus....so u played ball...eh?.....go to www.thefixisin.net and read if u can....i know 4, repeat 4 former d-1 players, and they ALL told me it was controlled....one, a qb, said he knew if they were going to cover before EVERY game.....WAKE UP!---IT'S 2012!
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #40
His toe was in first before his heel hits out of bounds. It's not a play where both hit at the same time.....

so YES he was in Bounds.

Sims dont tell me I need to know the rules Jack ass... I know the Rules.

IF his Foot ( Toe ) hits before the heel hits then he is in bounds.


my goodness
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #41
I think you missed the play

The Toe Hits before the heel


Boom+1
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #42
If they hit at the same time then yes.....its out. But they dont hit at the same time.... the Toe hits First.

Learn the Rules
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 451
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

His toe was in first before his heel hits out of bounds. It's not a play where both hit at the same time.....

so YES he was in Bounds.

Sims dont tell me I need to know the rules Jack ass... I know the Rules.

IF his Foot ( Toe ) hits before the heel hits then he is in bounds.


my goodness


Do you always resort to name calling when someone doesn't agree with you or you think you know more than that person?  You seem to be fairly knowledgeable but your name calling and arrogance paint a huge friggin target on your back.  

Also, in all fairness since you're gonna unload on the SEC because you think  they're having a "down" year, be sure to bomb yourself since you yourself are having a down year. 

I hope you have success the rest of the season, but your arrogance is just over the top.  Perhaps, be as humble as Tree, BEE, or Silly.  

And as far as Tree commenting about OSU playing Bama, I think Ok State shouldn't have choked versus an unranked Iowa State team and they would have got their shot.  They also blew a fairly decent lead in that game.  Also, I think that Okie State would have lost because of one reason: only A&M has Johnny football.  After watching him in person last weekend in Starkville, I told my brother he would win the Heisman and he also will be a better college football player than Cam.  Just my opinion.  We shall see.


 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #44
Quote Originally Posted by laythehammer:



Do you always resort to name calling when someone doesn't agree with you or you think you know more than that person?  You seem to be fairly knowledgeable but your name calling and arrogance paint a huge friggin target on your back.  

Also, in all fairness since you're gonna unload on the SEC because you think  they're having a "down" year, be sure to bomb yourself since you yourself are having a down year. 

I hope you have success the rest of the season, but your arrogance is just over the top.  Perhaps, be as humble as Tree, BEE, or Silly.  

And as far as Tree commenting about OSU playing Bama, I think Ok State shouldn't have choked versus an unranked Iowa State team and they would have got their shot.  They also blew a fairly decent lead in that game.  Also, I think that Okie State would have lost because of one reason: only A&M has Johnny football.  After watching him in person last weekend in Starkville, I told my brother he would win the Heisman and he also will be a better college football player than Cam.  Just my opinion.  We shall see.


my goodness.... chill out. Every time I make a comment its help on this pedestal.

Sims and I are ok... trust me.  

A few of you need to get a life and quit tweaking every post I make
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 451
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

my goodness.... chill out. Every time I make a comment its help on this pedestal.

Sims and I are ok... trust me.  

A few of you need to get a life and quit tweaking every post I make

I have a life bud thanks

That's fine that you and sims are ok, but if you and I knew each other we could debate each other all day but I'm not sure either of us need to call each other a jack ass.  I also wasn't referring to just calling sims a name.  You make too much of a habit of it.  Although I will admit sometimes people deserve to be called one with their comments toward you.  

Either way, you had a decent week so maybe it's turning around for you.  Good luck the rest of the way.

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #46
IF I insulted Sims...then I apologize.

In all fairness.... if the toe hits first before the heel goes out of bounds the player should be in bounds.... If not, then oh well. I was always under the impression that if the players toe is in or he drags the foot he is in.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 4807
Posted: #47
I too certainly thought it was an interception, but I also saw the exact same scenario a few weeks ago, and it too was ruled incomplete... just to be honest, I don't know the rule, if it matters whether you're stepping out of bounds forwards or backwards. I will have to disagree though, with you thinking the refs was making calls in favor of Bama.. Bama had the yellow laundry thrown on them all night.. they committed  mental mistakes all night.. They just simply wasn't prepared to play, and therfore they got their ass handed to them...  It appeared tonight that the Bama defense had never heard the word containment before, But you've got to love watching Manziel, that kid is a playmaker.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 48
Posted: #48
Boom, u are very knowledgeable BUT such an over grown 12 year old!  Read a lot of your posts and gained real good insight to things though.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 451
Posted: #49
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

IF I insulted Sims...then I apologize.

In all fairness.... if the toe hits first before the heel goes out of bounds the player should be in bounds.... If not, then oh well. I was always under the impression that if the players toe is in or he drags the foot he is in.

It's all good Boom.  I just think you should let your knowledge speak for itself and be a bit more humble but to each it's own 

I'm not sure what the rule is but my personal opinion is that it should be an int because he hit in bounds prior to hitting out of bounds.  Regardless, I've seen Tebow, Cam Newton, Cadillac Williams, Ronnie Brown, Mark Ingram and a few other good ones play CFB in person, and this kid demands more attention than anyone I've ever seen.  The really bad news is that my alma mater (ms state) has to play him for the next 3 years (or until he goes pro).  I've never seen a qb be so elusive and quick.  Vick maybe, but I was too busy chasing ass in high school and college to pay attention to CFb back then.


 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 19509
Posted: #50

Here comes the cockroaches out of thier dark holes.

This thread...

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.