All Forums | College Football

Jimmydafreak

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 118822
Posts: 708
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 13864
Posted: #276

Quote Originally Posted by billyh:

glad i don't bet games for a living!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 5415
Posted: #277
Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

Quote Originally Posted by billyh:

the only way pittsburg loses today is if big ben gets injured. steelers large!        -9.5 -1.20

I considered playing OVER the Steelers team total, but 28.5 is a little too rich for my blood.

When did Freak become a pro baller...Hey,u have to work your way up to play the NFL...2fortheminey...Love it when he urinates on The tout...lol
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 3646
Posted: #278
Quote Originally Posted by billyh:

glad i don't bet games for a living!!!!!!!!!!!!!
if you r not a gamesler ? why r u in did forum for ? 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33035
Posted: #279
Quote Originally Posted by mrdish33:

if you r not a gamesler ? why r u in did forum for ? 

What?
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 13864
Posted: #280

Three plays for me today.

Pittsburgh +3.5 vs. Navy

Navy Team Total UNDER 27.5

Central Michigan vs. Minnesota UNDER 24 (1st Half)

 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 13864
Posted: #281

Quote Originally Posted by dytide:

Bateman or Barnett next season ?

If Saban's history is any indication it'll be Bateman, but I sure I'm on board with most Alabama fans who are hoping to see Barnett.

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 59
Posted: #282
i cant find 27.5 anymore
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 5834
Posted: #283
well dang freak- I like the Navy tt over 27.5- 

I love that Minny 1st H under!

Good luck buddy!


 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 13864
Posted: #284

Quote Originally Posted by featherstone222:

i cant find 27.5 anymore

I'm still seeing the Navy team total @ 27.5, but I would still pull the trigger on 27.  I really don't think it'll matter.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 13864
Posted: #285
Quote Originally Posted by blowoutgm:

well dang freak- I like the Navy tt over 27.5- 

I love that Minny 1st H under!

Good luck buddy!

 
Having already faced the option attack in week 7, and with Pitt having extra time to prepare for the option attack this time around, I expect Navy to really struggle to move the ball on Pitt's defense.  See the Army game.  Assuming no OT, UNDER the Navy team total is my favorite play of the day.
 
 
 
 
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 13864
Posted: #286
Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

Pittsburgh +3.5 vs. Navy

  I forgot to mention that my book has Pitt +3 (Even), so I bought the hook here.

 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 13864
Posted: #287

I really don't see Pitt losing this game so I'm . . .

Adding:

Pitt ML +120 vs. Navy

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5105
Posted: #288
Good luck
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 174
Posted: #289
Lets win some $$$ Jimmy. BOL




 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1010
Posted: #290
Jimmy saw yer over in another thread last nite nyg over saved my day!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 174
Posted: #291
Well i'll take a KOR for a TD on the opening KO any day!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2014
Posts: 503
Posted: #292
Quote Originally Posted by mrdish33:

if you r not a gamesler ? why r u in did forum for ? 
   what? who?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2014
Posts: 503
Posted: #293
i'm never betting another GDMFPOS*@#% under again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2015
Posts: 148
Posted: #294
Good Luck next pick sir !  Always look at what you are taking much respect 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 13864
Posted: #295

19-10 after yesterday's debacle.

Air Force vs. California OVER 68.5

Always a little risky going over this high of a number when a triple option team is involved, but I think Cal's quick strike ability will offset Air Force's ball control attack.

Nevada vs. Colorado State UNDER 27.5 (1st Half)

Texas Tech vs. LSU UNDER 37.5 (1st Half)

Texas Tech vs. LSU -6.5 (Hook)

 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 12998
Posted: #296
Let's make that money Jimmy! Love the over!!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 627
Posted: #297
Thanks for your input during bowl season..what do you think of Cal and NC TT for a play today... BOL
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 13864
Posted: #298

Quote Originally Posted by milagrosman:

Thanks for your input during bowl season..what do you think of Cal and NC TT for a play today... BOL

The team total I like best in these two games is Baylor UNDER 32.5

Obviously, because I like the OVER in the AF/Cal game, I'm betting that one or both of those teams goes over their team total, I just have no feel for which one.  I would probably lean AF OVER 31.

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 148
Posted: #299
Air Force will get what they want, Cal is worse than #100 in stopping the run.
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 148
Posted: #300
and i also don't remember what the exact stat is called but Air Force is one of the worst in CFB at giving up "explosive plays". I forget what they designate an "explosive play" as... i believe 30+ yards, but don't hold me to it!!!
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.