Posted:
#26
Quote Originally Posted by damonte:
WM, it appears you sometime employ situational stratagem to your 'capping. Allow me to briefly bore you with one I remember from handicapping seminars I attended in Vegas in the early 80's. It was an over 60% situation that went: WHEN TOP 10 TEAMS FACE EACH OTHER, TAKE THE DOG WITH 7 OR MORE POINTS. That situation has occurred 4 times this year.
1]ND / OKLAHOMA
2]LSU / ALAB
3]FLA /FLA ST
4]GEO / ALAB
That's 4-0 versus the spread with ND on deck tonite. That's a tough nut to crack for anyone that considers playing Alabama tonite. GL.
WM, it appears you sometime employ situational stratagem to your 'capping. Allow me to briefly bore you with one I remember from handicapping seminars I attended in Vegas in the early 80's. It was an over 60% situation that went: WHEN TOP 10 TEAMS FACE EACH OTHER, TAKE THE DOG WITH 7 OR MORE POINTS. That situation has occurred 4 times this year.
1]ND / OKLAHOMA
2]LSU / ALAB
3]FLA /FLA ST
4]GEO / ALAB
That's 4-0 versus the spread with ND on deck tonite. That's a tough nut to crack for anyone that considers playing Alabama tonite. GL.
A 60% angle hitting a clip of 100%??? Ever hear of regression to the mean???
0
Hot Forum Topics
