All Forums | College Football

*** NCAA Football Week 11 ***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 76517
Posts: 289
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 182
Posted: #201

BSU -15 vs TCU

Who is your lean?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 90
Posted: #202
Quote Originally Posted by nfl_brosuf:



hey boom, did you contradicted yourself? 

on this thread here, you have virginia tech and utah to beat ucla but your wagering is different here.  What the dealio?  Give me something good to tail here. 

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=33?=101174659



Yea what is the deal with that?
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #203
Quote Originally Posted by nfl_brosuf:



hey boom, did you contradicted yourself? 

on this thread here, you have virginia tech and utah to beat ucla but your wagering is different here.  What the dealio?  Give me something good to tail here. 

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=33&sub=101174659


WTF are you talking about? That is my Contest Thread... I didnt pick those games yet. Those are the spreads for the contest.

You always chime in with weird shit


 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #204
Guys... I will answer and talk later... a little busy right now
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 113
Posted: #205
boom,
i thought you said you are not gonna fuck with GT no more.  I see you got them for 2 units tonite. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 1344
Posted: #206
 gl this week boom ....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 2093
Posted: #207
I like  a real lot of those plays   Auburn and TTEch   like a lot  BOL

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 163
Posted: #208
BOOM
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1196
Posted: #209
Man Boom was with you the whole way with GT!
If it was for #45 and that stupid punch for no reason, while getting the sack! That would have forced VT to punt the ball.
It was a total momentum killer and changed the whole game.
If VT would have punted, I believe GT could have scored on the next drive.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 227
Posted: #210
I seen this before its called the GATech curse doesn't matter side you take on them you lose.... The only way to break the curse is  on Saturday!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 7432
Posted: #211
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

Something doesnt seem right about this game
Agreed I will be on A&M -4. There is reason a road team is giving points to a ranked home dog
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 293
Posted: #212

Hey Boom.  I know you like totals, so it maybe worth taking a look at the Wisky Over..

Minnesota is playing a lot better football offensively, especially since Gray is back & healthy.  They put up 22 v Iowa in a win and put up 24 in a loss to MSU.  Defensively, earlier this year Michigan put 58 on them, and since then, Purdue put up 45, Nebraska put up 41 and Michigan State put 31 up.

Against the two worst defenses Wisconsin has faced the last couple weeks (Indiana and Purdue) they have scored 59 points and 61 points.  And they still managed 31 and 29 v MSU and Ohio State. 

Wisconsin should have no trouble putting high 40’s on the board and Minnesota can grab a couple themselves. Anything around  47-17 is a winner. 

Just a thought.  I really liked the line and thought I would share...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1334
Posted: #213
Hey Boom, I haven't read through this whole thread so I apologize in advance if you've touched on this already but I see A. Ellington listed as Q this week and I figured if anyone had the latest info here it would be you. I would feel much more comfortable knowing his status before I make a move on this game
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #214
adding


Stanford   -3.5   2 units

Michigan S.T   -2.5    2 units

Texas  /  Missouri   Under 59  2 units

Michigan  /  Illinois    Over 48.5   2 units
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #215
Plays Thursday - Saturday


Clemson   -16.5    2 units

Texas Tech   + 17   3 units

Auburn   +13.5   2 units

G.T   +1    2 units

Miss S.T  +18    2 Units

UCLA   +7   2 units

Stanford   -3.5   2 units

Michigan S.T   -2.5    2 units

Texas  /  Missouri   Under 59  2 units

Michigan  /  Illinois    Over 48.5   2 units



GL This weekend men...............

Washington  /  USC   Under 63.5   2 units

Oklahoma S.T  /  Texas Tech   Over 78   2 units
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #216
Plays Thursday - Saturday


Clemson   -16.5    2 units

Texas Tech   + 17   3 units

Auburn   +13.5   2 units

G.T   +1    2 units

Miss S.T  +18    2 Units

UCLA   +7   2 units

Stanford   -3.5   2 units

Michigan S.T   -2.5    2 units

Texas  /  Missouri   Under 59  2 units

Michigan  /  Illinois    Over 48.5   2 units

Washington  /  USC   Under 63.5   2 units

Oklahoma S.T  /  Texas Tech   Over 78   2 units




GL This weekend men...............
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #217
RLP - Thanks for sharing man... I looked at that play and the over does look good. I may pass this time. Thanks


Dolphnfan - Andre is 100%...Reports are saying he looks as fresh as he has looked all year
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 1672
Posted: #218
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

tree... BTW. No dis respect to you about my Oklahoma rant. you know what I mean. This is really to all the " insane " fans who thinks Oklahoma should go to the NC game.... only way they go is if all the other teams fall apart.

 

I have to disagree with you.  Your just looking at who they've lost too.  If Oregon beats Stanford, and Oklahoma wins out.  They're in, unless there is a rematch between LSU and Alabama.  Plain and simple.  

The teams Oklahoma has been beaten (and will have to beat) far out weighs and other one loss team and Boise State,

Florida St, Texas, Missouri, Texas A&M, Kansas St., Oklahoma St, Baylor.  

That's a heck of a schedule and all the teams that they're played so far in that list have been at least 10 point victories each and they domination all but FL ST and MIZZ.

Stop hatin on one game and look at the other 92% of the scheduel
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 1999
Posted: #219

Ba ba ba ba boom boom boom!

Good lookin plays man! 

Best of luck tomorrow~!

Lets get those units!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 1672
Posted: #220
should be "any other one loss teams and boise st"
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1334
Posted: #221
Thanks Boom, GL tomorrow
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 404
Posted: #222
tyler you are dumb as nails if you think you can lose at home to a scrub team and go to the NC....for real.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 8
Posted: #223
boom anything going tonight?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 318
Posted: #224

Good Luck Mr. Boom

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 1782
Posted: #225
GL Boom.
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.