If you think about it, When B.C came out and jumped up 14 - 0...that was it. Miami controlled the game from that point on.
Not really, no they did not. BC took the lead in the 3rd Q and Miami had several plays that could have resulted in turnovers (2 fumbles, none lost) but the ball bounced their way. Miami also had 9 penalties and BC had the ball on the 1 yard line with just over 2 minutes to go..
Chase Rettig throwing for 441 yards is really a bad sign for a defense.
If you think about it, When B.C came out and jumped up 14 - 0...that was it. Miami controlled the game from that point on.
Not really, no they did not. BC took the lead in the 3rd Q and Miami had several plays that could have resulted in turnovers (2 fumbles, none lost) but the ball bounced their way. Miami also had 9 penalties and BC had the ball on the 1 yard line with just over 2 minutes to go..
Chase Rettig throwing for 441 yards is really a bad sign for a defense.
I agree the Tigers looked great, although the score didnt really show it. This line is definitely alot to take... But IMO the over is the play at 66. I can see clemson throwing up 45-50...without too much trouble, and BSU will hit 21, however that Clemson D looked good to me. Id more then likely lock the over but ive seen alot of ppl leaning BSU +27. I disagree, I feel Clemson comes out hard and covers at home. Strong team that will move into the top 10, seeing as oklahoma and maybe georgia will move out.
Thoughts Boom? Would love another opinion
I agree the Tigers looked great, although the score didnt really show it. This line is definitely alot to take... But IMO the over is the play at 66. I can see clemson throwing up 45-50...without too much trouble, and BSU will hit 21, however that Clemson D looked good to me. Id more then likely lock the over but ive seen alot of ppl leaning BSU +27. I disagree, I feel Clemson comes out hard and covers at home. Strong team that will move into the top 10, seeing as oklahoma and maybe georgia will move out.
Thoughts Boom? Would love another opinion
Ill agree with that, but when I say they looked good, I mean considering they were playing a tough opponent in Auburn. Take this D vs. the other teams they play throughout their schedule, non-conference and weaker ACC teams, I think they'll do alright. Mind you, with Ellington running the ball like he did and Boyd showing many points of strong play, when Watkins returns I don't even think this D will hit the field that often.
This is why Im leaning the over because i know Clemson is going to put up over 40 pts and even if their D does show up BSU will still have a few scores.
Ill agree with that, but when I say they looked good, I mean considering they were playing a tough opponent in Auburn. Take this D vs. the other teams they play throughout their schedule, non-conference and weaker ACC teams, I think they'll do alright. Mind you, with Ellington running the ball like he did and Boyd showing many points of strong play, when Watkins returns I don't even think this D will hit the field that often.
This is why Im leaning the over because i know Clemson is going to put up over 40 pts and even if their D does show up BSU will still have a few scores.
Yes they did. At no point after that first quarter did B.C belong in that game.
BC had more yards and more first downs.
If you want to bet Miami this week because you think they can hang with KState, great. But it is kind of silly to misreprsent what happened last week.
Yes they did. At no point after that first quarter did B.C belong in that game.
BC had more yards and more first downs.
If you want to bet Miami this week because you think they can hang with KState, great. But it is kind of silly to misreprsent what happened last week.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.