Ok, let me try this ONCE MORE. And I won't pull the childish act of calling you names while doing it.
CLEMSON is up 9. WITH the ball. THEY HAVE POSSESSION. They are in NO DANGER of giving possession back to GT. You Kneel on the ball, the chances of GT getting possession are worse than converting a 4th down. You have ONE exchange from Center to QB and no defender will reasonably get to you to cause a fumble. If you RUN, you have TWO exchanges. Follow me now, Center to QB, QB to RB. You just doubled your chances to FUMBLE and give GT possession, something they had nearly NO CHANCE of getting if you kneel. Add to that your RB is now RUNNING TOWARDS 11 DEFENDERS that are gonna try and strip the ball. All it takes is ONE FUMBLE for GT to scoop it up and possibly score a TD (Hence the Miracle in the Meadowlands link, you heard of that play?). If that happens, then GT would still be down 1 score but the KEY THING is you just gave GT POSSESSION of the football to try an onside.
Kneeling, GT has nearly ZILCH chance of getting possession and a chance to win.
RUNNING TWICE just QUADRUPLED (an then some) the chance that GT could win the game.
Dude, you have been doing this a long time, this can't be that hard for you to grasp. Either you just don't get it, or you are so adamant about defending your cover as NOT A MOOSE that you are losing more and more credibility. Wow.
Ok, let me try this ONCE MORE. And I won't pull the childish act of calling you names while doing it.
CLEMSON is up 9. WITH the ball. THEY HAVE POSSESSION. They are in NO DANGER of giving possession back to GT. You Kneel on the ball, the chances of GT getting possession are worse than converting a 4th down. You have ONE exchange from Center to QB and no defender will reasonably get to you to cause a fumble. If you RUN, you have TWO exchanges. Follow me now, Center to QB, QB to RB. You just doubled your chances to FUMBLE and give GT possession, something they had nearly NO CHANCE of getting if you kneel. Add to that your RB is now RUNNING TOWARDS 11 DEFENDERS that are gonna try and strip the ball. All it takes is ONE FUMBLE for GT to scoop it up and possibly score a TD (Hence the Miracle in the Meadowlands link, you heard of that play?). If that happens, then GT would still be down 1 score but the KEY THING is you just gave GT POSSESSION of the football to try an onside.
Kneeling, GT has nearly ZILCH chance of getting possession and a chance to win.
RUNNING TWICE just QUADRUPLED (an then some) the chance that GT could win the game.
Dude, you have been doing this a long time, this can't be that hard for you to grasp. Either you just don't get it, or you are so adamant about defending your cover as NOT A MOOSE that you are losing more and more credibility. Wow.
believe it or not, the only pure thing left is high school sports and I am sure someone has a hand in there somewhere---like down south where high school football is king
i coach here in Pa and we can actually find lines for our games.....unreal!!
believe it or not, the only pure thing left is high school sports and I am sure someone has a hand in there somewhere---like down south where high school football is king
i coach here in Pa and we can actually find lines for our games.....unreal!!
Hawaii last year was the most obvious I've seen as far as shaving...but maybe because I witnessed the games first hand. TCU this year is shady at best. Anyone who thinks there is no squirrelly stuff going on in football, college or pros, I have a bridge to sell you.
Hawaii last year was the most obvious I've seen as far as shaving...but maybe because I witnessed the games first hand. TCU this year is shady at best. Anyone who thinks there is no squirrelly stuff going on in football, college or pros, I have a bridge to sell you.
Hawaii last year was the most obvious I've seen as far as shaving...but maybe because I witnessed the games first hand. TCU this year is shady at best. Anyone who thinks there is no squirrelly stuff going on in football, college or pros, I have a bridge to sell you.
Amen to that!!
Hawaii last year was the most obvious I've seen as far as shaving...but maybe because I witnessed the games first hand. TCU this year is shady at best. Anyone who thinks there is no squirrelly stuff going on in football, college or pros, I have a bridge to sell you.
Amen to that!!
Ok, let me try this ONCE MORE. And I won't pull the childish act of calling you names while doing it.
CLEMSON is up 9. WITH the ball. THEY HAVE POSSESSION. They are in NO DANGER of giving possession back to GT. You Kneel on the ball, the chances of GT getting possession are worse than converting a 4th down. You have ONE exchange from Center to QB and no defender will reasonably get to you to cause a fumble. If you RUN, you have TWO exchanges. Follow me now, Center to QB, QB to RB. You just doubled your chances to FUMBLE and give GT possession, something they had nearly NO CHANCE of getting if you kneel. Add to that your RB is now RUNNING TOWARDS 11 DEFENDERS that are gonna try and strip the ball. All it takes is ONE FUMBLE for GT to scoop it up and possibly score a TD (Hence the Miracle in the Meadowlands link, you heard of that play?). If that happens, then GT would still be down 1 score but the KEY THING is you just gave GT POSSESSION of the football to try an onside.
Kneeling, GT has nearly ZILCH chance of getting possession and a chance to win.
RUNNING TWICE just QUADRUPLED (an then some) the chance that GT could win the game.
Dude, you have been doing this a long time, this can't be that hard for you to grasp. Either you just don't get it, or you are so adamant about defending your cover as NOT A MOOSE that you are losing more and more credibility. Wow.
Ok, let me try this ONCE MORE. And I won't pull the childish act of calling you names while doing it.
CLEMSON is up 9. WITH the ball. THEY HAVE POSSESSION. They are in NO DANGER of giving possession back to GT. You Kneel on the ball, the chances of GT getting possession are worse than converting a 4th down. You have ONE exchange from Center to QB and no defender will reasonably get to you to cause a fumble. If you RUN, you have TWO exchanges. Follow me now, Center to QB, QB to RB. You just doubled your chances to FUMBLE and give GT possession, something they had nearly NO CHANCE of getting if you kneel. Add to that your RB is now RUNNING TOWARDS 11 DEFENDERS that are gonna try and strip the ball. All it takes is ONE FUMBLE for GT to scoop it up and possibly score a TD (Hence the Miracle in the Meadowlands link, you heard of that play?). If that happens, then GT would still be down 1 score but the KEY THING is you just gave GT POSSESSION of the football to try an onside.
Kneeling, GT has nearly ZILCH chance of getting possession and a chance to win.
RUNNING TWICE just QUADRUPLED (an then some) the chance that GT could win the game.
Dude, you have been doing this a long time, this can't be that hard for you to grasp. Either you just don't get it, or you are so adamant about defending your cover as NOT A MOOSE that you are losing more and more credibility. Wow.
booms
prob some young punk, no wife, no gf, no friends, just a computer to make him feel tough....no worries
booms
prob some young punk, no wife, no gf, no friends, just a computer to make him feel tough....no worries
booms
prob some young punk, no wife, no gf, no friends, just a computer to make him feel tough....no worries
booms
prob some young punk, no wife, no gf, no friends, just a computer to make him feel tough....no worries
You are right, this conversation is over. Instead of refuting my assertions, you response is...wait for it...
""
LOL, is right.
GLTU this coming week. Hope you get back in the positive, I honestly do.
You are right, this conversation is over. Instead of refuting my assertions, you response is...wait for it...
""
LOL, is right.
GLTU this coming week. Hope you get back in the positive, I honestly do.
Haha, thank god I'm not the only one that is bothered by that. Once or twice, here and there, ok. But everytime? lol.
Haha, thank god I'm not the only one that is bothered by that. Once or twice, here and there, ok. But everytime? lol.
You are right, this conversation is over. Instead of refuting my assertions, you response is...wait for it...
""
LOL, is right.
GLTU this coming week. Hope you get back in the positive, I honestly do.
You are right, this conversation is over. Instead of refuting my assertions, you response is...wait for it...
""
LOL, is right.
GLTU this coming week. Hope you get back in the positive, I honestly do.
Well Boom....One thing is for sure...We won't have a Joe sighting talking about Stoops being outcoached for a while...Lmao
Well Boom....One thing is for sure...We won't have a Joe sighting talking about Stoops being outcoached for a while...Lmao
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.