FINAL CARD (99% final ....looking at one late game)
Clemson -4 (would play up to -6.5)
East Carolina -3 (see if you can get +10.5)
Ole Miss TT under 35 (would play down to 34)
UCF TT under 16 (would play down to 14.5)
Table of Contents for Write-Ups
- Miami / Clemson
- Tuesday game
- Thursday games
- Friday games
- REQUEST LINE (SM vs Charlotte; Wash St vs Az; Kent vs BG)
- Big 10
- SEC
- REQUEST LINE (Cincy vs UConn)
- REQUEST LINE ( SMU vs USF)
- Florida St / Georgia Tech
- Houston / UCF
Final REQUEST TIDBITS
Sorry - will not have time for detailed write-up but I did look at the last 3 requests last night.....
1) Utah +3.5....I like the Utes. Only reason to not play them is the BOOGEY MAN theory that somebody with a dark hat and scars knows something.....Not an official play but will have some degenerate cash down on them...Not a P12 expert so do not really know how good all the "talent" is for USC I keep hearing about they could win easily I suppose....Kinda like USC/ND last week when we passed had no idea how USC would play....Still a little in the dark. Summary - Lean Utah.
2) Ohio -3 Buffalo....Would actually lean a bit to the doggie here....I know that sounds crazy but Ohio LB core is entirely depleted apparently - RB either starting or playing backup LB...In general lots of young guys starting and Buffalo D held BG to their season low. Summary Lean Buffalo but would want +3 minimum.
3) Duke / VT.....Would play Duke if you can find a 3.5 out there but right now I only see 3s.....VT last 2 home games were pretty good dismantled NC St and a good game vs Pitt......Heck as I am typing this the under looks SUCCULENT Summary - lean Duke but would need 3.5.....Lean under no lower than 44.
GL guys -
Will just clean up the final questions next.
FINAL CARD (99% final ....looking at one late game)
Clemson -4 (would play up to -6.5)
East Carolina -3 (see if you can get +10.5)
Ole Miss TT under 35 (would play down to 34)
UCF TT under 16 (would play down to 14.5)
Table of Contents for Write-Ups
- Miami / Clemson
- Tuesday game
- Thursday games
- Friday games
- REQUEST LINE (SM vs Charlotte; Wash St vs Az; Kent vs BG)
- Big 10
- SEC
- REQUEST LINE (Cincy vs UConn)
- REQUEST LINE ( SMU vs USF)
- Florida St / Georgia Tech
- Houston / UCF
Final REQUEST TIDBITS
Sorry - will not have time for detailed write-up but I did look at the last 3 requests last night.....
1) Utah +3.5....I like the Utes. Only reason to not play them is the BOOGEY MAN theory that somebody with a dark hat and scars knows something.....Not an official play but will have some degenerate cash down on them...Not a P12 expert so do not really know how good all the "talent" is for USC I keep hearing about they could win easily I suppose....Kinda like USC/ND last week when we passed had no idea how USC would play....Still a little in the dark. Summary - Lean Utah.
2) Ohio -3 Buffalo....Would actually lean a bit to the doggie here....I know that sounds crazy but Ohio LB core is entirely depleted apparently - RB either starting or playing backup LB...In general lots of young guys starting and Buffalo D held BG to their season low. Summary Lean Buffalo but would want +3 minimum.
3) Duke / VT.....Would play Duke if you can find a 3.5 out there but right now I only see 3s.....VT last 2 home games were pretty good dismantled NC St and a good game vs Pitt......Heck as I am typing this the under looks SUCCULENT Summary - lean Duke but would need 3.5.....Lean under no lower than 44.
GL guys -
Will just clean up the final questions next.
General - there ya go bud...GL today !
Damon
Jules
Kroep76 - I would still lean over at 57.5/58 no higher. UConn lean at +14 might even add it to my card but I only see 12s mostky out there. GL
Come - out of those picks I like Utah TAM Fla ST the most - GL
Johnny - ....You may be right about USC......I can see playing them at 2.5 but anything higher than 3 seems like Utah is the way to go.....BOL man !!
VITS
BWS - sorry no read AT ALL on that Army game...BOL pal keep making paper
warcam
upside - great call on SD St Another good call I might add ! GL today
GoNoles - good question buddy....when I look at those 10 point teasers for a SUBSCRIBER - I look for the "safest" lowest volatility games (at least my opinion)....For example low total games vs high.....lower pointspread vs high....etc.....NCAA is a hot mess for teasers b/c anything can happen but if I am asked - I will respond ......So the Bama game? Really like them but teasing down to -5 did not feel as good - Not unthinkable they could win by 3 or 4 but I do like that one.....Tenn off a bye adds a wrinkle that they could come out strong and Bama off a set of tough games - still like it but not in my top 5......T AM - like that one - but - T AM off the Bama game and Ole Miss at home it is not impossible to think they come off flat and higher totaled games are inherently more risky for teasers.....My favs were Wisc as I do not think they will lose outright maybe lose a low scoring squeeker at worst.....So Flo I have them rated highly and have them 85%+ win SU so -3 should not be difficult with SMU D.....Do not think Fla St loses that game so getting +4 is a bonus....etc......Just some thoughts ! Glad to hear you are dominating the teasers.....BOL this week thanks for stopping in
Sorry if we missed anyone !
mega
General - there ya go bud...GL today !
Damon
Jules
Kroep76 - I would still lean over at 57.5/58 no higher. UConn lean at +14 might even add it to my card but I only see 12s mostky out there. GL
Come - out of those picks I like Utah TAM Fla ST the most - GL
Johnny - ....You may be right about USC......I can see playing them at 2.5 but anything higher than 3 seems like Utah is the way to go.....BOL man !!
VITS
BWS - sorry no read AT ALL on that Army game...BOL pal keep making paper
warcam
upside - great call on SD St Another good call I might add ! GL today
GoNoles - good question buddy....when I look at those 10 point teasers for a SUBSCRIBER - I look for the "safest" lowest volatility games (at least my opinion)....For example low total games vs high.....lower pointspread vs high....etc.....NCAA is a hot mess for teasers b/c anything can happen but if I am asked - I will respond ......So the Bama game? Really like them but teasing down to -5 did not feel as good - Not unthinkable they could win by 3 or 4 but I do like that one.....Tenn off a bye adds a wrinkle that they could come out strong and Bama off a set of tough games - still like it but not in my top 5......T AM - like that one - but - T AM off the Bama game and Ole Miss at home it is not impossible to think they come off flat and higher totaled games are inherently more risky for teasers.....My favs were Wisc as I do not think they will lose outright maybe lose a low scoring squeeker at worst.....So Flo I have them rated highly and have them 85%+ win SU so -3 should not be difficult with SMU D.....Do not think Fla St loses that game so getting +4 is a bonus....etc......Just some thoughts ! Glad to hear you are dominating the teasers.....BOL this week thanks for stopping in
Sorry if we missed anyone !
mega
thanks man GL to you today.
Ya well the best plays in the Temple game were any of the unders congrats to those guys who nailed that and the side was Temple we read the game well but really did not pay enough attention to how good that Temple OL is esp in pass protection against a team with a lot of sacks. We give ourselves a "D" grade because not only did the EC pick lose - but any time it is close like that near the end it means really we should not have played EC and the dog was the right call. GL again !
thanks man GL to you today.
Ya well the best plays in the Temple game were any of the unders congrats to those guys who nailed that and the side was Temple we read the game well but really did not pay enough attention to how good that Temple OL is esp in pass protection against a team with a lot of sacks. We give ourselves a "D" grade because not only did the EC pick lose - but any time it is close like that near the end it means really we should not have played EC and the dog was the right call. GL again !
sorry pal - did not look at that one. Sure would not lay 8.5. GL !
sorry pal - did not look at that one. Sure would not lay 8.5. GL !
FINAL CARD (99% final ....looking at one late game)
Clemson -4 (would play up to -6.5)
East Carolina -3 (see if you can get +10.5)
Ole Miss TT under 35 (would play down to 34)
UCF TT under 16 (would play down to 14.5)
Table of Contents for Write-Ups
- Miami / Clemson
- Tuesday game
- Thursday games
- Friday games
- REQUEST LINE (SM vs Charlotte; Wash St vs Az; Kent vs BG)
- Big 10
- SEC
- REQUEST LINE (Cincy vs UConn)
- REQUEST LINE ( SMU vs USF)
- Florida St / Georgia Tech
- Houston / UCF
Final REQUEST TIDBITS
Sorry - will not have time for detailed write-up but I did look at the last 3 requests last night.....
1) Utah +3.5....I like the Utes. Only reason to not play them is the BOOGEY MAN theory that somebody with a dark hat and scars knows something.....Not an official play but will have some degenerate cash down on them...Not a P12 expert so do not really know how good all the "talent" is for USC I keep hearing about they could win easily I suppose....Kinda like USC/ND last week when we passed had no idea how USC would play....Still a little in the dark. Summary - Lean Utah.
2) Ohio -3 Buffalo....Would actually lean a bit to the doggie here....I know that sounds crazy but Ohio LB core is entirely depleted apparently - RB either starting or playing backup LB...In general lots of young guys starting and Buffalo D held BG to their season low. Summary Lean Buffalo but would want +3 minimum.
3) Duke / VT.....Would play Duke if you can find a 3.5 out there but right now I only see 3s.....VT last 2 home games were pretty good dismantled NC St and a good game vs Pitt......Heck as I am typing this the under looks SUCCULENT Summary - lean Duke but would need 3.5.....Lean under no lower than 44.
GL guys -
Will just clean up the final questions next.
FINAL CARD (99% final ....looking at one late game)
Clemson -4 (would play up to -6.5)
East Carolina -3 (see if you can get +10.5)
Ole Miss TT under 35 (would play down to 34)
UCF TT under 16 (would play down to 14.5)
Table of Contents for Write-Ups
- Miami / Clemson
- Tuesday game
- Thursday games
- Friday games
- REQUEST LINE (SM vs Charlotte; Wash St vs Az; Kent vs BG)
- Big 10
- SEC
- REQUEST LINE (Cincy vs UConn)
- REQUEST LINE ( SMU vs USF)
- Florida St / Georgia Tech
- Houston / UCF
Final REQUEST TIDBITS
Sorry - will not have time for detailed write-up but I did look at the last 3 requests last night.....
1) Utah +3.5....I like the Utes. Only reason to not play them is the BOOGEY MAN theory that somebody with a dark hat and scars knows something.....Not an official play but will have some degenerate cash down on them...Not a P12 expert so do not really know how good all the "talent" is for USC I keep hearing about they could win easily I suppose....Kinda like USC/ND last week when we passed had no idea how USC would play....Still a little in the dark. Summary - Lean Utah.
2) Ohio -3 Buffalo....Would actually lean a bit to the doggie here....I know that sounds crazy but Ohio LB core is entirely depleted apparently - RB either starting or playing backup LB...In general lots of young guys starting and Buffalo D held BG to their season low. Summary Lean Buffalo but would want +3 minimum.
3) Duke / VT.....Would play Duke if you can find a 3.5 out there but right now I only see 3s.....VT last 2 home games were pretty good dismantled NC St and a good game vs Pitt......Heck as I am typing this the under looks SUCCULENT Summary - lean Duke but would need 3.5.....Lean under no lower than 44.
GL guys -
Will just clean up the final questions next.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.