all - appreciate it, BOL
big - leaning towards GSU in that one....new offense working pretty well, familiar with option in past and decent matchups against Wofford, Navy over past couple, played NCS even....maybe 34-17 or 34-20 type
puffkit - best to keep hooks to minimum maybe 5% of less of games....not bad idea on 3 or 7 though from time to time....personally 10-12 games a year out of 200 including bowls...figure need push on just 1 of the 10 to break even....can buy on a couple more if getting -108 on some books and can buy cheap once in awhile if -105 and still average -110...overall though best to be selective on a few games a year
actually only 8-2 on 0.5 small plays, unfortunately hitting 8 in a row means run probably ends soon there.....still waiting on a couple numbers to be posted...c'mon damn it...... and checking out a couple totals or team totals
all - appreciate it, BOL
big - leaning towards GSU in that one....new offense working pretty well, familiar with option in past and decent matchups against Wofford, Navy over past couple, played NCS even....maybe 34-17 or 34-20 type
puffkit - best to keep hooks to minimum maybe 5% of less of games....not bad idea on 3 or 7 though from time to time....personally 10-12 games a year out of 200 including bowls...figure need push on just 1 of the 10 to break even....can buy on a couple more if getting -108 on some books and can buy cheap once in awhile if -105 and still average -110...overall though best to be selective on a few games a year
actually only 8-2 on 0.5 small plays, unfortunately hitting 8 in a row means run probably ends soon there.....still waiting on a couple numbers to be posted...c'mon damn it...... and checking out a couple totals or team totals
double, mega, mjm, QB -
lego -was looking at Baylor if 24 or 25 figuring 52-20 type, possibly worse.....however at 32+ Bulls could hang around back door with Licata slinging it around and if Bears let up in 4th, so we'll pass....A&M similar situation, could easily run them off field although have been known to let Rice and similar hang around number
degen - thanks, yeah looks like some other early money was on those too...agree with most of your thoughts on the others....Ohio defense looks much improved this year so leaning towards points there as well......agree good spot for ECU and decent enough squad to hang around if VT is flat and probably will be.....was actually looking at that WV-MD matchup and had some of those same thoughts, number edging up to 3.5-4 some places so seeing what it does.....no lean on UMASS-Vandy......like UGA although believe will be tough game, for whatever reason though high scoring series in Athens and low scoring in SC so no lean on total......FL owns the series and should be fired up, KY improved however offense probably overmatched in this one, was hoping for 14-15 would still lean FL
adding
Cincinnati -10 (-115)
Tulsa PK (0.75)
Cincinnati 37 Toledo 17 - Bearcats probably ready to hit someone after waiting a couple weeks...will be interesting to see Kiel in first start....as long as Munchie is 3rd string that's a good sign he won't play....quite a few players still around for revenge spot for 29-23 loss (despite 478-355 yardage) at Toledo in '12....Rockets not great at QB and defense mediocre at best and missing a couple DBs
Tulsa 30 FAU 23 - although not great at this point Tulsa seems more likely to make a few plays based on QB and WRs....and has played pretty well on the road against lesser teams going 6-1 straight up against teams with losing records over last 3 years
waiting on a couple others and checking out some totals
double, mega, mjm, QB -
lego -was looking at Baylor if 24 or 25 figuring 52-20 type, possibly worse.....however at 32+ Bulls could hang around back door with Licata slinging it around and if Bears let up in 4th, so we'll pass....A&M similar situation, could easily run them off field although have been known to let Rice and similar hang around number
degen - thanks, yeah looks like some other early money was on those too...agree with most of your thoughts on the others....Ohio defense looks much improved this year so leaning towards points there as well......agree good spot for ECU and decent enough squad to hang around if VT is flat and probably will be.....was actually looking at that WV-MD matchup and had some of those same thoughts, number edging up to 3.5-4 some places so seeing what it does.....no lean on UMASS-Vandy......like UGA although believe will be tough game, for whatever reason though high scoring series in Athens and low scoring in SC so no lean on total......FL owns the series and should be fired up, KY improved however offense probably overmatched in this one, was hoping for 14-15 would still lean FL
adding
Cincinnati -10 (-115)
Tulsa PK (0.75)
Cincinnati 37 Toledo 17 - Bearcats probably ready to hit someone after waiting a couple weeks...will be interesting to see Kiel in first start....as long as Munchie is 3rd string that's a good sign he won't play....quite a few players still around for revenge spot for 29-23 loss (despite 478-355 yardage) at Toledo in '12....Rockets not great at QB and defense mediocre at best and missing a couple DBs
Tulsa 30 FAU 23 - although not great at this point Tulsa seems more likely to make a few plays based on QB and WRs....and has played pretty well on the road against lesser teams going 6-1 straight up against teams with losing records over last 3 years
waiting on a couple others and checking out some totals
UCF +10 (-115) (0.75)
Seems reasonable, but Mizzou is the #3 team in the country ATS over the past two years. Not touching it, too risky. I can easily see Mizzou beating UCF by 21+.
UCF +10 (-115) (0.75)
Seems reasonable, but Mizzou is the #3 team in the country ATS over the past two years. Not touching it, too risky. I can easily see Mizzou beating UCF by 21+.
treble-very possible MO wins by 3 TDs if Holman is rattled
NC-what's going on buddy, GL this week
puffkit- hadn't really looked at that....at 16/49....totals project as 32.5-16.5....which sounds about right although not sure Huskies get to 17 so maybe lean under
adding small play.....West VA +3.5.....WV offense looking much improved and looking for payback for 37-0 matchup LY, not impressed with turtles....WV 27-24........small degenerate play......WMU-Idaho over 59.5.....give both offenses advantage over defenses having faced better last time out.....37-33
looking at a couple totals or team totals Fri or Sat
updated week 3
Ohio St -29.5 (1.5)
Mississippi -26 (1.25)
Georgia -3 (hook)
Cincinnati -10 (-115)
Tulsa PK (0.75)
LA Tech +6.5 (0.75)
UCF +10 (-115) (0.75)
small plays (0.5) - Texas St +12.5, West VA +3.5
small degenerate plays (0.3) - WMU-Idaho o59.5
treble-very possible MO wins by 3 TDs if Holman is rattled
NC-what's going on buddy, GL this week
puffkit- hadn't really looked at that....at 16/49....totals project as 32.5-16.5....which sounds about right although not sure Huskies get to 17 so maybe lean under
adding small play.....West VA +3.5.....WV offense looking much improved and looking for payback for 37-0 matchup LY, not impressed with turtles....WV 27-24........small degenerate play......WMU-Idaho over 59.5.....give both offenses advantage over defenses having faced better last time out.....37-33
looking at a couple totals or team totals Fri or Sat
updated week 3
Ohio St -29.5 (1.5)
Mississippi -26 (1.25)
Georgia -3 (hook)
Cincinnati -10 (-115)
Tulsa PK (0.75)
LA Tech +6.5 (0.75)
UCF +10 (-115) (0.75)
small plays (0.5) - Texas St +12.5, West VA +3.5
small degenerate plays (0.3) - WMU-Idaho o59.5
all
CB - you got it buddy...Now, that, I got me some Seagram's gin
Everybody got they cups, but they ain't chipped in
pipe - agree with those points....not much drop if any between Rockets 1st and 2nd string (although does not mean either is proven good)......and agree having played a couple games is an advantage...at least for 1st Q which could carry over into full game....on the other hand EMU had a game under their belt against FL and some other examples so can work either way since Cats should be ready after first couple possessions
BTP - probably would, although would obviously be for lower amount since 3-6 range covers a lot of ground in what could be a close game, however still like bulldogs at less than TD
LT backers......mixed in some unofficial ML
adding
Oklahoma St -13 (-115)
Oklahoma St 34 UTSA 13 - although Walsh is out, appear Garman has a good arm and played pretty well last week....Gundy 'I'm a man....I'm 40!' claims team was really flat last week and sounds like they'll be ready....Roland (probable) back at RB and even though UTSA defense is pretty solid the same group did give up a few in last year's 56-35 back door cover....offense still unproven against the better defenses and on the road
looking at some totals and team totals tomorrow.....time to check out some week 4 matchups
all
CB - you got it buddy...Now, that, I got me some Seagram's gin
Everybody got they cups, but they ain't chipped in
pipe - agree with those points....not much drop if any between Rockets 1st and 2nd string (although does not mean either is proven good)......and agree having played a couple games is an advantage...at least for 1st Q which could carry over into full game....on the other hand EMU had a game under their belt against FL and some other examples so can work either way since Cats should be ready after first couple possessions
BTP - probably would, although would obviously be for lower amount since 3-6 range covers a lot of ground in what could be a close game, however still like bulldogs at less than TD
LT backers......mixed in some unofficial ML
adding
Oklahoma St -13 (-115)
Oklahoma St 34 UTSA 13 - although Walsh is out, appear Garman has a good arm and played pretty well last week....Gundy 'I'm a man....I'm 40!' claims team was really flat last week and sounds like they'll be ready....Roland (probable) back at RB and even though UTSA defense is pretty solid the same group did give up a few in last year's 56-35 back door cover....offense still unproven against the better defenses and on the road
looking at some totals and team totals tomorrow.....time to check out some week 4 matchups
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.