GL ozz i think you may have something here today with army i was a bit undecided on this game, i'm seeing lots of people on smu, sometimes thats when i like to go the other way, i think army plays tough today but im just going to take the under in this one, but best of luck buddy
0
GL ozz i think you may have something here today with army i was a bit undecided on this game, i'm seeing lots of people on smu, sometimes thats when i like to go the other way, i think army plays tough today but im just going to take the under in this one, but best of luck buddy
Besides Tulsa, C-Usa has not faired well SU or ATS in these bowl games. I'm hoping that the statistics hold up on this one because that's solely what my play is based on.
Under looks good too.
0
Good luck bro.
Besides Tulsa, C-Usa has not faired well SU or ATS in these bowl games. I'm hoping that the statistics hold up on this one because that's solely what my play is based on.
Have to respectfully take the other side Ozz. Army built their stats on the #97 schedule in the country. There BIG game was Navy and they failed. Add in the SMU home field....ther is a reason why money is pouring in on the Stangs (i do think it will be an under play however). I have SMU -6.5 and the under
0
Have to respectfully take the other side Ozz. Army built their stats on the #97 schedule in the country. There BIG game was Navy and they failed. Add in the SMU home field....ther is a reason why money is pouring in on the Stangs (i do think it will be an under play however). I have SMU -6.5 and the under
Have to respectfully take the other side Ozz. Army built their stats on the #97 schedule in the country. There BIG game was Navy and they failed. Add in the SMU home field....ther is a reason why money is pouring in on the Stangs (i do think it will be an under play however). I have SMU -6.5 and the under
The final score in the Navy game is a bit mis-leading due to the fact that Army fumbled on the Navy 1 which was returned for a 99 YD TD.
Had Army gotten that TD they very easily could've pulled out a "W" or at the very worst a cover of the +8 they were getting in that game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RapeStove:
Have to respectfully take the other side Ozz. Army built their stats on the #97 schedule in the country. There BIG game was Navy and they failed. Add in the SMU home field....ther is a reason why money is pouring in on the Stangs (i do think it will be an under play however). I have SMU -6.5 and the under
The final score in the Navy game is a bit mis-leading due to the fact that Army fumbled on the Navy 1 which was returned for a 99 YD TD.
Had Army gotten that TD they very easily could've pulled out a "W" or at the very worst a cover of the +8 they were getting in that game.
K-State are ranked 106 of 120 in TOTAL yards allowed and have the unique 'ability' to make any offense look explosive.
K-State can put up points based off of their 33 ppg avg and they rank 20th in rushing offense whereas Syracuses' weak spot on Defense is against the rush allowing 137+ per game on the ground ranked 42.
Risking 4 Units
to win 4 Units
BOL
ozz
0
Second play :
Kansas St v. Syracuse
OVER 48
K-State avgs 33 ppg / allows 28 ppg
SYR avgs 21 ppg / allows 18 ppg
K-State are ranked 106 of 120 in TOTAL yards allowed and have the unique 'ability' to make any offense look explosive.
K-State can put up points based off of their 33 ppg avg and they rank 20th in rushing offense whereas Syracuses' weak spot on Defense is against the rush allowing 137+ per game on the ground ranked 42.
look at tenn 3rd stuff for the last four games..iam a tenn fan and will be attending game, but this team is a completly different offense will bray as qb..no pick for me but bol..my gut feeling is tenn but thats my heart talking ha
0
look at tenn 3rd stuff for the last four games..iam a tenn fan and will be attending game, but this team is a completly different offense will bray as qb..no pick for me but bol..my gut feeling is tenn but thats my heart talking ha
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.