Two full TD's at home? Obviously this line is a product of the most public win of the weekend, endlessly looped on ESPN.
Yes I'll take all those points....with Penn State coming off what is by far biggest win for the program since the Paterno scandal. And if anyone has noticed they've played three straight home games and 4 of 5 at home. Tough to travel after that, especially after celebrating for a day or two.
Nebraska couldn't even cover 14 at home in a significant revenge spot from last year (Purdue beat them 55-45) as an undefeated team and after Purdue gifted them a TD in the first 15 seconds as well. After all that Nebraska only scores 27 total.
I'm taken aback at this line. Did anyone watch the Nebraska game? Blough was 25/43 for 309 and was 80% in the first half.
The coaching change is like a huge shot in the arm to this team. I saw them running plays they haven't run in 4 years.
14 points at home is huge. Gladly taking all of it.
This game just sets up nicely for a cover. Nothing easy but there's so much insurance for a newly inspired Purdue team without the shadow of Hazell holding them back!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
2016 Record: 22-8
The Pick:
PURDUE +14 over PENN STATE
Two full TD's at home? Obviously this line is a product of the most public win of the weekend, endlessly looped on ESPN.
Yes I'll take all those points....with Penn State coming off what is by far biggest win for the program since the Paterno scandal. And if anyone has noticed they've played three straight home games and 4 of 5 at home. Tough to travel after that, especially after celebrating for a day or two.
Nebraska couldn't even cover 14 at home in a significant revenge spot from last year (Purdue beat them 55-45) as an undefeated team and after Purdue gifted them a TD in the first 15 seconds as well. After all that Nebraska only scores 27 total.
I'm taken aback at this line. Did anyone watch the Nebraska game? Blough was 25/43 for 309 and was 80% in the first half.
The coaching change is like a huge shot in the arm to this team. I saw them running plays they haven't run in 4 years.
14 points at home is huge. Gladly taking all of it.
This game just sets up nicely for a cover. Nothing easy but there's so much insurance for a newly inspired Purdue team without the shadow of Hazell holding them back!
usually follow you blind but cashed big on penn due to my instant hate of the other teams mascot on the burbon in my belly. will likely follow but cant pull trigger right away. wouldnt you think this line climbs during the week as folks keep watching espn and nittnay lions eating brutus the wierdazz human? :)
0
usually follow you blind but cashed big on penn due to my instant hate of the other teams mascot on the burbon in my belly. will likely follow but cant pull trigger right away. wouldnt you think this line climbs during the week as folks keep watching espn and nittnay lions eating brutus the wierdazz human? :)
Purdue is a bad team. They covered against Nebraska because Nebraska was looking ahead to Wisconsin. This could end up like Iowa's game against Purude. But will tail anyways.
0
Purdue is a bad team. They covered against Nebraska because Nebraska was looking ahead to Wisconsin. This could end up like Iowa's game against Purude. But will tail anyways.
Hope you didn't bet it yet Scal. No way that line drops below 14. Think you should be able to get 16.5-17 later in the week as the pub will pound Pedo State. Bol
0
Hope you didn't bet it yet Scal. No way that line drops below 14. Think you should be able to get 16.5-17 later in the week as the pub will pound Pedo State. Bol
You guys are more than free to wait for a better spot.
It jumped from 12.5 to 14 in about 2 minutes on 5Dimes.
Opened at 10.5 on BetOnline.
I'm fine with the 14.
I think once some of the bigger bettors start to understand how well Purdue performed against Nebraska, and their bets, possibly swallowing up some Purdue action, may cause this line to go to 13.5 which is obviously below the 2 TD's I more than will take.
Last week UCF opened at -2.5 and I never saw it again so I was happy to jump here.
0
You guys are more than free to wait for a better spot.
It jumped from 12.5 to 14 in about 2 minutes on 5Dimes.
Opened at 10.5 on BetOnline.
I'm fine with the 14.
I think once some of the bigger bettors start to understand how well Purdue performed against Nebraska, and their bets, possibly swallowing up some Purdue action, may cause this line to go to 13.5 which is obviously below the 2 TD's I more than will take.
Last week UCF opened at -2.5 and I never saw it again so I was happy to jump here.
5dimes has $500 limit right now for me for the college games. I am guessing its because its early. Probably all your followers went in and put some bets and at that low limit line will move easily. You won't know the real line until later into the week when the limits go up. But i doubt 5dimes will give me more than $1k limit on this game for me. 5dimes haven't let me bet more than $1k on football sides since week 2...not even on game day.
0
5dimes has $500 limit right now for me for the college games. I am guessing its because its early. Probably all your followers went in and put some bets and at that low limit line will move easily. You won't know the real line until later into the week when the limits go up. But i doubt 5dimes will give me more than $1k limit on this game for me. 5dimes haven't let me bet more than $1k on football sides since week 2...not even on game day.
you have a fixation on Purdue, hilarious no way that is your favorite bet on this board Scal, no way, I don't believe it regardless of what you say, can't do it
keep your streak alive, can't wait until later in the week when your "hoping Scal will lose a play group" shows up to post after first quarter (only to disappear once game covers), gotta love the Covers Nation, never seen people wish others would lose like these bums
.
0
you have a fixation on Purdue, hilarious no way that is your favorite bet on this board Scal, no way, I don't believe it regardless of what you say, can't do it
keep your streak alive, can't wait until later in the week when your "hoping Scal will lose a play group" shows up to post after first quarter (only to disappear once game covers), gotta love the Covers Nation, never seen people wish others would lose like these bums
5dimes has $500 limit right now for me for the college games. I am guessing its because its early. Probably all your followers went in and put some bets and at that low limit line will move easily. You won't know the real line until later into the week when the limits go up. But i doubt 5dimes will give me more than $1k limit on this game for me. 5dimes haven't let me bet more than $1k on football sides since week 2...not even on game day.
I'm telling ya, ya may not see 14 again. If you see 14.5 I'll be floored. That is a sick number Ian!
0
Quote Originally Posted by lanmaster:
5dimes has $500 limit right now for me for the college games. I am guessing its because its early. Probably all your followers went in and put some bets and at that low limit line will move easily. You won't know the real line until later into the week when the limits go up. But i doubt 5dimes will give me more than $1k limit on this game for me. 5dimes haven't let me bet more than $1k on football sides since week 2...not even on game day.
I'm telling ya, ya may not see 14 again. If you see 14.5 I'll be floored. That is a sick number Ian!
you have a fixation on Purdue, hilarious no way that is your favorite bet on this board Scal, no way, I don't believe it regardless of what you say, can't do it
keep your streak alive, can't wait until later in the week when your "hoping Scal will lose a play group" shows up to post after first quarter (only to disappear once game covers), gotta love the Covers Nation, never seen people wish others would lose like these bums
It is my favorite game!
Apparently these bettors have no idea what fight Purdue put up in Lincoln which is leaps and bounds beyond anything seen under Hazell.
These squares simply don't watch the games, see Purdue at any number and fade them.
That was appropriate under Hazell but things have changed very quickly!
And what's great is that all of Purdue shi* metrics are so terrible, when these guys datamine and run their simulations, they get Purdue losing by 30. Not the case. Not in this game! Things have changed! Look at what Purdue did with Iowa. Down 35-7, they fought like hell and almost got it inside the -11 with 5 minutes left to play, only falling 3 outside the number in a blowout.
With Purdue, you get the 'lose respectably' mentality too which helps you cover big spreads. And this spread is big. Maryland was only giving 10. Penn State is better than Maryland but they are coming off such an electric win.
Not only that, but Purdue had one goal this year: A bowl of any kind.
To lock that up, you need 6 wins. Lose this game and go to 3-5 and you have to go 3-1 to close out the year. They are going to fight to win this. Not cover, but win. They will fight. And with 2 TD's and a fight, we are good to go.
0
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:
you have a fixation on Purdue, hilarious no way that is your favorite bet on this board Scal, no way, I don't believe it regardless of what you say, can't do it
keep your streak alive, can't wait until later in the week when your "hoping Scal will lose a play group" shows up to post after first quarter (only to disappear once game covers), gotta love the Covers Nation, never seen people wish others would lose like these bums
It is my favorite game!
Apparently these bettors have no idea what fight Purdue put up in Lincoln which is leaps and bounds beyond anything seen under Hazell.
These squares simply don't watch the games, see Purdue at any number and fade them.
That was appropriate under Hazell but things have changed very quickly!
And what's great is that all of Purdue shi* metrics are so terrible, when these guys datamine and run their simulations, they get Purdue losing by 30. Not the case. Not in this game! Things have changed! Look at what Purdue did with Iowa. Down 35-7, they fought like hell and almost got it inside the -11 with 5 minutes left to play, only falling 3 outside the number in a blowout.
With Purdue, you get the 'lose respectably' mentality too which helps you cover big spreads. And this spread is big. Maryland was only giving 10. Penn State is better than Maryland but they are coming off such an electric win.
Not only that, but Purdue had one goal this year: A bowl of any kind.
To lock that up, you need 6 wins. Lose this game and go to 3-5 and you have to go 3-1 to close out the year. They are going to fight to win this. Not cover, but win. They will fight. And with 2 TD's and a fight, we are good to go.
Apparently these bettors have no idea what fight Purdue put up in Lincoln which is leaps and bounds beyond anything seen under Hazell.
These squares simply don't watch the games, see Purdue at any number and fade them.
That was appropriate under Hazell but things have changed very quickly!
And what's great is that all of Purdue shi* metrics are so terrible, when these guys datamine and run their simulations, they get Purdue losing by 30. Not the case. Not in this game! Things have changed! Look at what Purdue did with Iowa. Down 35-7, they fought like hell and almost got it inside the -11 with 5 minutes left to play, only falling 3 outside the number in a blowout.
With Purdue, you get the 'lose respectably' mentality too which helps you cover big spreads. And this spread is big. Maryland was only giving 10. Penn State is better than Maryland but they are coming off such an electric win.
Not only that, but Purdue had one goal this year: A bowl of any kind.
To lock that up, you need 6 wins. Lose this game and go to 3-5 and you have to go 3-1 to close out the year. They are going to fight to win this. Not cover, but win. They will fight. And with 2 TD's and a fight, we are good to go.
well it is certainly "let down" spot of the year with Penn St after that shocking upset of the Buckeyes
hope you win it as i like cheering against Penn St whenever I can
.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
It is my favorite game!
Apparently these bettors have no idea what fight Purdue put up in Lincoln which is leaps and bounds beyond anything seen under Hazell.
These squares simply don't watch the games, see Purdue at any number and fade them.
That was appropriate under Hazell but things have changed very quickly!
And what's great is that all of Purdue shi* metrics are so terrible, when these guys datamine and run their simulations, they get Purdue losing by 30. Not the case. Not in this game! Things have changed! Look at what Purdue did with Iowa. Down 35-7, they fought like hell and almost got it inside the -11 with 5 minutes left to play, only falling 3 outside the number in a blowout.
With Purdue, you get the 'lose respectably' mentality too which helps you cover big spreads. And this spread is big. Maryland was only giving 10. Penn State is better than Maryland but they are coming off such an electric win.
Not only that, but Purdue had one goal this year: A bowl of any kind.
To lock that up, you need 6 wins. Lose this game and go to 3-5 and you have to go 3-1 to close out the year. They are going to fight to win this. Not cover, but win. They will fight. And with 2 TD's and a fight, we are good to go.
well it is certainly "let down" spot of the year with Penn St after that shocking upset of the Buckeyes
hope you win it as i like cheering against Penn St whenever I can
Purdue is not as bad as I originally thought. Watched Nebraska game in full. No dumb luck hanging in and covering that spread. David Blough looks like a gamer. It will be very hard to replicate that kind of emotion playing at home in front of the white out crowd that Penn State has this past weekend. I'm starting to come around to the idea of betting on Purdue.
0
Purdue is not as bad as I originally thought. Watched Nebraska game in full. No dumb luck hanging in and covering that spread. David Blough looks like a gamer. It will be very hard to replicate that kind of emotion playing at home in front of the white out crowd that Penn State has this past weekend. I'm starting to come around to the idea of betting on Purdue.
keep your streak alive, can't wait until later in the week when your "hoping Scal will lose a play group" shows up to post after first quarter (only to disappear once game covers), gotta love the Covers Nation, never seen people wish others would lose like these bums
a) some people are just perpetually unhappy and hate to see other people succeed. b) some people want someone to blame when any of their picks lose c) some people (*cough* touts *cough*) dont want people to successfully post free winners and will do anything to run them off.
0
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:
keep your streak alive, can't wait until later in the week when your "hoping Scal will lose a play group" shows up to post after first quarter (only to disappear once game covers), gotta love the Covers Nation, never seen people wish others would lose like these bums
a) some people are just perpetually unhappy and hate to see other people succeed. b) some people want someone to blame when any of their picks lose c) some people (*cough* touts *cough*) dont want people to successfully post free winners and will do anything to run them off.
I was going to mention the diaper fire that is Fresno State, but, they too, go the memo, and fired their inept coach. Too bad.....couldn't cover vs. Utah State last weekend......
Coach was a genius when he had Derek Carr......
0
I was going to mention the diaper fire that is Fresno State, but, they too, go the memo, and fired their inept coach. Too bad.....couldn't cover vs. Utah State last weekend......
Interesting. I was definitely going to look into fading Penn State after that big win. They are ripe for a letdown and they haven't been good outside of Happy Valley.
It's too early to pull the trigger for me. But, I like where your head is at!
0
Interesting. I was definitely going to look into fading Penn State after that big win. They are ripe for a letdown and they haven't been good outside of Happy Valley.
It's too early to pull the trigger for me. But, I like where your head is at!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.