I am not sure I get the point of 86ing Hazell right now.
I would have shitcannned him the day after they blew the 2015 opener @Marshall.
Does the top brass at Purdue believe that they can get bowl eligible this season? That may be a bit ambitious......
I am not sure I get the point of 86ing Hazell right now.
I would have shitcannned him the day after they blew the 2015 opener @Marshall.
Does the top brass at Purdue believe that they can get bowl eligible this season? That may be a bit ambitious......
I am not sure I get the point of 86ing Hazell right now.
I would have shitcannned him the day after they blew the 2015 opener @Marshall.
Does the top brass at Purdue believe that they can get bowl eligible this season? That may be a bit ambitious......
It's true. 3-3 is his best record as Hendrix noted.
Give him a chance to get to a bowl like he said he would. .500 through 3 games is above and beyond expectations.
I am not sure I get the point of 86ing Hazell right now.
I would have shitcannned him the day after they blew the 2015 opener @Marshall.
Does the top brass at Purdue believe that they can get bowl eligible this season? That may be a bit ambitious......
It's true. 3-3 is his best record as Hendrix noted.
Give him a chance to get to a bowl like he said he would. .500 through 3 games is above and beyond expectations.
Just want to say it is the Big Ten West. More can be expected.
Just want to say it is the Big Ten West. More can be expected.
I am not sure I get the point of 86ing Hazell right now.
I would have shitcannned him the day after they blew the 2015 opener @Marshall.
Does the top brass at Purdue believe that they can get bowl eligible this season? That may be a bit ambitious......
Purdue should have won that game against Marshall that's why Vern!
If not for Appleby's pick 6's, they win! Can't pin that on Hazell!
I am not sure I get the point of 86ing Hazell right now.
I would have shitcannned him the day after they blew the 2015 opener @Marshall.
Does the top brass at Purdue believe that they can get bowl eligible this season? That may be a bit ambitious......
Purdue should have won that game against Marshall that's why Vern!
If not for Appleby's pick 6's, they win! Can't pin that on Hazell!
Purdue should have won that game against Marshall that's why Vern!
If not for Appleby's pick 6's, they win! Can't pin that on Hazell!
No kidding......I had Purdue on the Moneyline big in that one.....it was a fat +250 and a great spot to earn..opening weekend with a ton of returners against a Marshall squad moving on from QB Cato? What a spot......only Purdue pissses that one away.
I absolutely hang that loss on Hazell. He should have made the change after the opening pick 6 from Appleby and went to Blough. They split reps all through summer camp, so it wouldn't have been a big switch...and they would have won the game. Seriously, the first play of the game, and your QB throws to the flat against a base cover 2? Nice read Apple.......have a seat.
OR he could have taken the game out of Appleby's hands...they were running the ball well....didn't need captain fantastic to throw 2 pick 6's and sink the ship. HC's need to have better feel.........
To me, that showed Hazell's inability to make decisions on the fly.....and was a great illustration of how limited he is as a head coach. How the heck did he get the job to begin with?
In any case, Purdue should have let him play the string out and moved on immediately with their coaching hire. Buying 6 weeks for their coaching search isn't going to get them anywhere....AND if the interim coach gets them to a bowl game, then they will likely end up having to hire the prickk. Which means 4 more years of winter at Purdue.
Purdue should have won that game against Marshall that's why Vern!
If not for Appleby's pick 6's, they win! Can't pin that on Hazell!
No kidding......I had Purdue on the Moneyline big in that one.....it was a fat +250 and a great spot to earn..opening weekend with a ton of returners against a Marshall squad moving on from QB Cato? What a spot......only Purdue pissses that one away.
I absolutely hang that loss on Hazell. He should have made the change after the opening pick 6 from Appleby and went to Blough. They split reps all through summer camp, so it wouldn't have been a big switch...and they would have won the game. Seriously, the first play of the game, and your QB throws to the flat against a base cover 2? Nice read Apple.......have a seat.
OR he could have taken the game out of Appleby's hands...they were running the ball well....didn't need captain fantastic to throw 2 pick 6's and sink the ship. HC's need to have better feel.........
To me, that showed Hazell's inability to make decisions on the fly.....and was a great illustration of how limited he is as a head coach. How the heck did he get the job to begin with?
In any case, Purdue should have let him play the string out and moved on immediately with their coaching hire. Buying 6 weeks for their coaching search isn't going to get them anywhere....AND if the interim coach gets them to a bowl game, then they will likely end up having to hire the prickk. Which means 4 more years of winter at Purdue.
PJ Fleck would be a good choice, but I see him looking at Miss St. or possibly Baylor.
My money is on Brock Spack, HC at Illinois St. Former All Big 10 LB, former DC under Tiller (I think). Should've gotten the job before Hazell, but.... Hell, Spack might still be miffed that he didn't get the job in the first place and stay at ILL St.
Really, who cares? It's Purdon't and BB is right around the corner!
PJ Fleck would be a good choice, but I see him looking at Miss St. or possibly Baylor.
My money is on Brock Spack, HC at Illinois St. Former All Big 10 LB, former DC under Tiller (I think). Should've gotten the job before Hazell, but.... Hell, Spack might still be miffed that he didn't get the job in the first place and stay at ILL St.
Really, who cares? It's Purdon't and BB is right around the corner!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.