I've been waiting for this all year.
Alabama +4 50 Units Largest bet YTD
Been following u for a while since baseball and I totaly agree probally a money line play as well
GL large large play
I've been waiting for this all year.
Alabama +4 50 Units Largest bet YTD
Been following u for a while since baseball and I totaly agree probally a money line play as well
GL large large play
I've been waiting for this all year.
Alabama +4 50 Units Largest bet YTD
Been following u for a while since baseball and I totaly agree probally a money line play as well
GL large large play
Damn E, was afraid you might be on 'bama here... why so confident in this play? i have such a HARD time playing against Tebow, esp. in this last year of his. plus seems like florida is just now hitting their stride.
also, if the play is 'bama, wouldn't you recommend waiting until the last second possible.. i can see this line reaching 7 or so by gametime.
Damn E, was afraid you might be on 'bama here... why so confident in this play? i have such a HARD time playing against Tebow, esp. in this last year of his. plus seems like florida is just now hitting their stride.
also, if the play is 'bama, wouldn't you recommend waiting until the last second possible.. i can see this line reaching 7 or so by gametime.
The #12 rushing D in the SEC held Bama to 73 yars rushing. What will the #9 rushing D in the nation do?
And to say wheter or not Ingram plays will have zero impact on the outcome of the game is ludacris
Bama rushed for 136 yards and averaged 4.1 yards per rushing attempt last year versus Florida, and they will probably do as well or better this year assuming Florida runs a similar defensive scheme which I suspect they will. I certainly don't expect them to mimic Auburn's defensive gameplan so I don't think your comparison is applicable.
It is not ludicris to say Bama minus Ingram will not have a deleterious effect on Bama's offense because Trent Richardson (Ingram's replacement) is a better RB than Ingram. Personally, I'd much rather see Richardson run the ball than Ingram. Be that as it may, it's a moot argument because Ingram will play.
The #12 rushing D in the SEC held Bama to 73 yars rushing. What will the #9 rushing D in the nation do?
And to say wheter or not Ingram plays will have zero impact on the outcome of the game is ludacris
Bama rushed for 136 yards and averaged 4.1 yards per rushing attempt last year versus Florida, and they will probably do as well or better this year assuming Florida runs a similar defensive scheme which I suspect they will. I certainly don't expect them to mimic Auburn's defensive gameplan so I don't think your comparison is applicable.
It is not ludicris to say Bama minus Ingram will not have a deleterious effect on Bama's offense because Trent Richardson (Ingram's replacement) is a better RB than Ingram. Personally, I'd much rather see Richardson run the ball than Ingram. Be that as it may, it's a moot argument because Ingram will play.
You have my permission to lose your money on Florida.
You have my permission to lose your money on Florida.
Largest Bet Hmmm I don't know why it would be..but best of luck man.
Hmmm .. Alabama peaked on that game winning drive in Auburn That drive was impressive. You will see why its my largest bet of the year after Bama wins Sayurday Nt.
Largest Bet Hmmm I don't know why it would be..but best of luck man.
Hmmm .. Alabama peaked on that game winning drive in Auburn That drive was impressive. You will see why its my largest bet of the year after Bama wins Sayurday Nt.
Please move Florida to -7 so I can Unload my Bank account.
Please move Florida to -7 so I can Unload my Bank account.
Please move Florida to -7 so I can Unload my Bank account.
I don't think it'll get to 7, but 6.5 is a possibility.
Please move Florida to -7 so I can Unload my Bank account.
I don't think it'll get to 7, but 6.5 is a possibility.
I've been waiting for this all year.
I've been waiting for this all year.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.