All Forums | College Football

SEC=joke!!!!!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2967
Posts: 63
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 14428
Posted: #26
who you callin a backwood's bumpkin you fuck stick?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 10
Posted: #27

When did Boise have a SEC team,in Nov???

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 4040
Posted: #28
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:

 

Nobody? Boise State sure did.

Not so fast........... SEC always schedules tough teams out of conference early..... including BS, so once again, who does it in Nov with the $ on the line.  NOBODY
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 4040
Posted: #29

This is a nice conversation and worthy of lucid well thought out positions... not a name calling thread....  I think my SEC position is defensible, but I would never revert to name calling to defend the undefendable...... there are many out there with SEC fatigue, I understand that.....  but seriously, would you want YOUR team to schedule an SEC team in NOV... no freaking way...  we are fans, but coaches are not standing in line to fall on their swords...

I stand by my statement: NOBODY wants to play an SEC out of conference game in NOV...... so dont let your hate of the SEC blur the facts.....

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:

Nobody? Boise State sure did.

Is this the same Boise State team that plays glorified high school teams for half their conference games?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 4040
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:

 

Nobody? Boise State sure did.

Hey BUNNY...... Give me ANY conference ANY FREAKING conference... that WOULD EVEN SCHEDULE BSU????? I have not seen BIG 10 schedule them, I have not see BIG 12 schedule them, I have not seen PAC 12 schedule them. HELL NOT EVEN NOTRE DAME HAD ENOUGH BALLS TO SCHEDULE THEM.... But the SEC DID

And one team, BSU is the basis of your decision ... common man..

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 1396
Posted: #32
Id give my left nut to see an 8 or 16 team playoff.  If all or the majority of teams r SEC teams then so be it, although as u point out i dont think the politically correct ncaa would allow it.  As long as they allow multiple entries from conference it would still be far superior to existing system
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 4040
Posted: #33
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 36999
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by The_BigDog:

Hey BUNNY...... Give me ANY conference ANY FREAKING conference... that WOULD EVEN SCHEDULE BSU????? I have not seen BIG 10 schedule them, I have not see BIG 12 schedule them, I have not seen PAC 12 schedule them. HELL NOT EVEN NOTRE DAME HAD ENOUGH BALLS TO SCHEDULE THEM.... But the SEC DID

And one team, BSU is the basis of your decision ... common man..


 They played P12 teams 4 years in a row (2007-2010).........then BSU went & waxed Georgia LY.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 4482
Posted: #35
It's so funny because the BCS is set up for the SEC. It's not even debatable. Where were all of the National Championships from the SEC before the BCS was created? I counted 2 in the past 30 years. Alabama and Florida. They couldn't even get a team in the game, let alone win it.


With this billion dollar TV deal, the analysts are told to hype up the SEC. They have to. As soon as it looked like Alabama was about to be taken down last week, Verne Lundquist gets on his knees, wondering how they can get Georgia into the title game now.


The SEC plays nobody out of conference, and I mean no one. Of course the defenses are gonna be great, when the quarterbacks in the mighty SEC have been pathetic over the years. The two best they have seen are Cam Newton and Matthew Stafford. Give me a break. The bottom half of that league have been so bad it's not even funny.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 4482
Posted: #36
https://www.thepostgame.com/commentary/201208/better-without-em-northern-manifesto-southern-secession-chuck-thompson-sec-bcs
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 12718
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by bluelightning:

Texas A&M beating Bama proves the SEC isn't some overlord conference. Every SEC homer says every day how no team from another conference could come in and compete, blah blah. Big 12 injected the 3rd/4th best team into the SEC and look what happened. Bama gets dominated




BEST ANSWER EVER
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 16131
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by shark_apreza:





BEST ANSWER EVER

and they went 1-2 against the SEC's three best teams with two of them being at home.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2002
Posts: 1649
Posted: #39
I'd like to hear some reasoning as to why the ESPN, other networks, NCAA or anybody else has motivation to promote & try to uphold the dominance of the SEC like some conspiracy theorists in this thread have stated? Is it because they have those major markets like Tuscaloosa, Baton Rouge & Knoxville or is it because of the tradition & national following that schools like Oklahoma, Notre Dame, Ohio St., USC & Florida St. don't have? Seriously, I'm not an SEC guy, but it's ridiculous to say they're overrated or the other teams besides LSU & Bama suck. They've won 6 straight NC & all leagues have shit teams at the bottom. The only conference this year that could even stake a claim to possibly being better is the Pac 12. Big 10 is in a shambles this year, ACC is definitely top heavy with FSU & Clemson, B12 has only 2 teams that play any defense at all & don't even mention the Big East, Mt. West or Conf USA. Until another conference at least wins back to back titles or beats the SEC's best head to head there's really no legitimate discussion. If I was an SEC basher I'd be pissed that Bama lost last week. This finally could have been the year a team (Oregon) beat them in the title game.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 151
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:


 They played P12 teams 4 years in a row (2007-2010).........then BSU went & waxed Georgia LY.
 and we all know what happened. USC was hanging 60 + points on Sec teams. BAMA losing to A&M was the best thing to happen to the SEC. Because had Bama met Oregon in the BCS, CHIP KELLEY has already said he is looking to hang 60 on them.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 72
Posted: #41
Oregon? Do LSU and Auburn ring a bell?
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 16131
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by jasonperry91:

 and we all know what happened. USC was hanging 60 + points on Sec teams. BAMA losing to A&M was the best thing to happen to the SEC. Because had Bama met Oregon in the BCS, CHIP KELLEY has already said he is looking to hang 60 on them.


LOL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 92
Posted: #43
I hope Oregon actually loses to USC in the pac12 title game so Oregon get's bumped out of the BCS Title game and hopefully fall into an Alabama bowl game. i want to see that
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 16131
Posted: #44
You guys do realize that A&Ms offense is better than Oregons right? A&M has a GIGANTIC OL with good RB's and the much better QB. Oregons offense is a run based option with small OL, RB's and that has been shut down in 3 BCS bowls already. Every year people fall for this same shit because of what they see teams do against horrible defense.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 1523
Posted: #45

Bama lost AT HOME last week to a team that was ranked 15th.  Now, they play a high school team and don't stand a chance at getting any respect back.  Western Carolina isn't just non-conference, it's a 1 game winner in a lower conference.

This is why the nation laughs at the cowards in the SEC.

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 16131
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by 1969USC:

Bama lost AT HOME last week to a team that was ranked 15th.  Now, they play a high school team and don't stand a chance at getting any respect back.  Western Carolina isn't just non-conference, it's a 1 game winner in a lower conference.

This is why the nation laughs at the cowards in the SEC.


If there is a team they should laugh at, it is Georgia. They have the worst schedule in the SEC.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 14521
Posted: #47

Every conference has a maximum of two alpha male teams that fight each other for supremacy. All the others are equal to and therefore very beatable by any team of equal stature and similar record on an ygiven weekend.

The fact is that the bottom feeders in the SEC try to puff themselves up by the successes of the two top programs and their mega-coaches in Bama and LSU. But what conference should NOT try do the same? The fact other conferences don't puff themselves is just poor confidence and a lack of salesmanship.  Who can blame them? No, they are not top to bottom dominant. Kentucky, Vanderbilt, Tenn, Miss, are just doormats like any other program out there. ESPN however is the variable that contributes to the fluffing every 5 minutes of broadcast. WHY? Because they have inked deals with the SEC. They have televised SEC vs "any shit fodder Big 12 or Big 10 school" so the SEC can still look dominant every Dec-Jan.

It's called POLITICS. It's part of life.

SEC has two great programs (QBs are mediocre and the Bama offense is conservative, while the LSU play calling is WHACKY).

Oregon > Bama or LSU--and I am not trying to inject anything about the PAC 12. Fuck the PAC 12. I'm just saying Oregon football is better.

Leave the conference comparisons to ESPN talking heads who are PAID to say SEC fluffing non-sequitors.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 72
Posted: #48
I repeat: Oregon? Does LSU and Aubun ring a bell?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 14521
Posted: #49

Quote Originally Posted by aleato:

I repeat: Oregon? Does LSU and Aubun ring a bell?

That's the past. Shall I bring up the 1980s while were at it?

 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 14521
Posted: #50

Or do you think Auburn can beat Oregon today?

Does Boise St clobbering "almighty Georgia" leave an aftertaste?

How about the Utah Utes going undefeated against His Royal Highness Saban and "Roll Tide Roll"?

No consistency.

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.