All Forums | College Football

Tappy's College Football Playoffs

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2499
Posts: 39
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 3470
Posted: #26
Adding Mizzou PK over Texas, they are going to kill them
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4754
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by Tappy:


Clemson has the 6th ranked defense in College Football, and Alabama has the 2nd behind Wisconsin, but I give the edge to Bama because of Wisconsin's weak schedule.

As for the Auburn game, saying that a game will be determined by how good a team plays vs an opponent of a different team, especially in a rivalry game, will cost you a lot of money when betting. 

Clemson in 6th in yards allowed. Check out ESPN's Defensive Efficiency ratings. They factor in many other aspects in their ratings. 
1. Clemson
2. UGA
3. Wisky
4. Alabama
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 5848
Posted: #28
Clemson's defense is better than Bama's- 

Texas will dominate Mizzo on the line of scrimmage- Interesting matchup in that game. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 12718
Posted: #29

When someone says.... " our players, our defense..our...our.." its hard to take on serious besides you read so biased

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 9
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by Tappy:

That is weird, I could have sworn they were an 8 point underdog... In that case, I am taking South Carolina +8

Kind of makes your earlier "reasoning" look silly.

You had no idea about the teams in this game, you just saw SEC and picked the side.

If you were going to give up 8 points, and now have realized you are GETTING 8 points then you should fly to Vegas and lay a huge bet. But I have a feeling my assumption was right...."Sec, oh yea i take them"
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2017
Posts: 96
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by Tappy:

Wisconsin -6 over Miami - Two teams coming off big losses, Wisconsin was a bit closer and I think Wisconsin has the better defense. Waiting on the under for this one as well. 

South Carolina -8 over Michigan - I think 8 is a bit too much with Michigan's defense, but I am taking the Cocks. 

Army +3 because I was in the Army




You lose all credibility saying you would bet South Carolina -8. Clearly just some SEC groupie
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25489
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by Tappy:

South Carolina -8 over Michigan - I think 8 is a bit too much with Michigan's defense, but I am taking the Cocks


 it's 2017, to each their own Tappy 

good luck bro 
.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 3470
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by AquaMan2016:


Kind of makes your earlier "reasoning" look silly.

You had no idea about the teams in this game, you just saw SEC and picked the side.

If you were going to give up 8 points, and now have realized you are GETTING 8 points then you should fly to Vegas and lay a huge bet. But I have a feeling my assumption was right...."Sec, oh yea i take them"

There are several SEC teams I am betting against and not betting... And I have not placed the bet for that game, I am actually now leaning more towards Michigan. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 3470
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by hokiedegen:



You lose all credibility saying you would bet South Carolina -8. Clearly just some SEC groupie

That had nothing to do with the SEC... As I stated, I hated that line and had no idea why SC was favored by that much, and was only playing it because of Vegas making the mistake. They changed the line to Michigan favored. 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 2183
Posted: #35
as . for  bama . thay . have a . running . play .  Qb   if thay .  have . to . pass to . win that in . big truble  .


  i see . clemson in a  away     34-- 17
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 3470
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by mrmo:

as . for  bama . thay . have a . running . play .  Qb   if thay .  have . to . pass to . win that in . big truble  .


  i see . clemson in a  away     34-- 17

Familiarize yourself with three names, Damien Harris, Bo Scarborough, and Najee Harris and then talk to me again about our run game. 

Bama 28 Clemson 14
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 1317
Posted: #37
Oklahoma #s are scewed by their weak schedule and are still inferior . Dunno how anybody can wager on a defense you know is going to be run over . Chances are better the other way . 

Alabama seems like a much more precarious play to me a bounce here or there and either team has the same chance to win . 
 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2017
Posts: 41
Posted: #38

Quote Originally Posted by Tappy:

QUOTE Originally Posted by mrmo: as . for  bama . thay . have a . running . play .  Qb   if thay .  have . to . pass to . win that in . big truble  .  i see . clemson in a  away     34-- 17 Familiarize yourself with three names, Damien Harris, Bo Scarborough, and Najee Harris and then talk to me again about our run game. Bama 28 Clemson 14

bama 28-14? wont happen. Jalen Hurts is a safety playing qb and cannot throw a forward pass. Wrong team is favored. Alabama wants revenge. This is a business trip for clemson. Clemson will win by 10 or so. You had best hope bama can run necause they sure cant pass. Best win was lsu who lost to troy. Lol at that nonsense. 

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4754
Posted: #39

Congrats Tappy! Alabama ear every bit of this win. I couldn’t be more disappointed with our offensive effort, both players and the coaches. We took the field like Bama was going to just roll over and give us the win. Embarrassingly unprepared. 

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.