Tech angles week 8

NCAA has been very good this year, and the NFL?...well, not exactly.

If you resonate with these, all well and good.........if you don't, or feel that there is no probable correlation between winning and past history, then fade if you wish. 

After each explanation I include the query text used in the database to get my results for you to check my work or do your own amending if that is up your alley.

If I feel like I can give out winners, this will continue on an ongoing basis,...if I feel I can't, or that I am somehow hexing myself, I'll shut it down.....

1)  Play ON an away conference week 8 dog of less than 14 points that;

  a)   has won less than 2 out of their last two road games

  b)  has two or less wins on the season

  c)  rushes for less yards per game than they allow

  d)  their opponent is unranked

  e)  playing a Saturday game

41-20-1 ATS (+4.8), 25-37 straight up (-2.6)

ON Wyoming, Baylor, FAU, UAB, UCLA

AD and line<14 and week=8 and tS(W@A, N=2)<2 and C and division=FBS and t:wins<=2 and tA(rushing yards-o:rushing yards)<0 and day=Saturday and o:rank=None

2)  Play AGAINST a week 8 home conference dog of less than 14 points on Saturday that....

  a)  Doesn't have the same number of wins as their present opponent

  b)  Has a net negative rushing yards differential  in comparison to their present opponent

  c)  Their opponent either has won 2 or 0 out of their past 2 road games (but not 1 out of their last two).

  d)  They have won less than 3 games on the season...

7-21 ATS...(-8.0), 3-26 ATS (-15.6)

AGAINST Air Force, Southern Miss

week = 8 and HD and tA(rushing yards-o:rushing yards) - oA(rushing yards-o:rushing yards) <0 and line < 14 and day = Saturday and division = FBS and t:wins != o:wins and oS(W@A, N=2) !=1 and C and t:wins<3

Plays:

1)  Colorado State...1 unit

2)  Arkansas State...1 unit

3)  Wyoming..........1 unit

4)  Baylor..............1 unit

5)  UAB.................1 unit

6)  UCLA...............1 unit

Gl Indy

if you’re going to try to go tout for next year, best bet is to scrap the teams that no one cares about.  You’re better off trying to fade the top 25 or something.  

Wish you much success 

Ah, well,...speaking of which.......

3)  A ranked favorite of less than 14 points......

  a) playing a non-ranked favorite in a non-neutral site who will be favored their next game....324-430-12 ATS (-1.7), 43%

  b) playing a ranked favorite in a non-neutral site who will be favored their next game....243-230-15 ATS (0.7), 52.5%

Games between ranked teams favor the favorite historically, while dogs cover 57% of the time in smaller lined games when the ranked team's present opponent is unranked.

I thought Indigo and spottie were the same person tbh

Ah, thanks buddy last week was a college week for me I didn't play any Pro games and went 7-3 and I don't play college but I saw something in a thread, you put in and somewhere else, took your picks and thats what happened. I'll see what you got to say this week and get back to ya or put a couple in myself (you know what happens when we have the same teams in the (nfl). By the way check your email see if it's still working.

NFL picks have been horrible, but this week will be the best week all season for the pros....I'll give you a call this week....won 10 in a row in the  baseball playoffs last week, which was a pretty great surprise....bankroll has gone from X to over 8X...we'll see if it continues.

H and total<42 and week=8 and line>2 and C and season>2017   (Iowa & Wis) o= MCST,NORW

HF and tA(total yards-o:total yards) >50 and week = 8 and t:wins < 5 and line<-14 and o:wins>0 and total>=47  ( TLN 64% &OV 71%) o=Rice

week = 8 and po:division = FBS and F and ats streak>3 and n:site = home and line<-3 and rank<=25  (16-0 SU 12-4 ats 75% 9-5-2 OV 64% IWST , Army, IND (o=CFL,ECAR,NEB

week = 8 and F and rank = None and p:D and t:wins > 0 and line >= -6 and H and o:ats streak>-2 and o:wins<2 (ATS 5-13 FLST 27%) o=Duke

week = 8 and F and rank = None and p:D and t:wins > 0 and line >= -6 and A and o:ats streak>-2 and o:wins>2(ATS  5-21 NEV UN 6-13) o=FRES

NEB may be an UN since there's a good and a Bad

Forget the NEB it's a goog and a bad Good UN

Forget the NEB it's a play and a UN

WTF, NEB is a good and Bad but is a good UN there hope this works

And, those ugly dogs keep popping up in query searches of very good betting angles...makes sense as the public loses a large percentage of the time and teams that have done poorly in their seasons so far are not sexy picks in the betting arena......love an ugly dog this weekend, your wallet will appreciate it....

4)  Away conference dogs of less than 14 points in week 8 that have lost their last two road games have gone 72-42-2 ATS (+3.5).....if we add a couple of minor tweaks that our play-on team hasn't won 2 games exactly and their present opponent has won at least one game this moves to 55-22 ATS, which is pretty great.......ON Wyoming, Baylor, FAU, UAB, Toledo, Central Michigan, UCLA, Boston College, Troy, Kennessaw State

AD and week = 8 and line < 14 and division = FBS and tS(W@A, N=2) = 0 and C and t:wins!=2 and o:wins>0

Plays:

Adding:

7)  Toledo.................1 unit

8)  Central Michigan...1 unit

9)  Boston College.....1 unit

____________________________

1)  Colorado State....1 unit

2)  Arkansas State...1 unit

3)  Wyoming..........1 unit

4)  Baylor..............1 unit

5)  UAB.................1 unit

6)  UCLA...............1 unit

In post #12 above....FAU and Baylor both are on two wins this season-to-date so they have been deleted from consideration.

Adding:

7)  Toledo.................1 unit

8)  Central Michigan...1 unit

9)  Boston College.....1 unit

____________________________

1)  Colorado State....1 unit

2)  Arkansas State...1 unit

3)  Wyoming..........1 unit

4)  Baylor..............1 unit....cancelled

5)  UAB.................1 unit

6)  UCLA...............1 unit

OK let me get this right post #7 3rd one down NEB is a go against but a go OV and the 5th one down NEV is a play and a good UN.

p:AF and AD and week=8 and line<20 and o:rank>4 (another for Army at 70% and a good UN there's 2 for Army at 70% or more.)

t:team = IOWA and AFC and line>-8 (a 80+% and a 70+% on the OV)

week =8 and p:margin < -6 and rank = None and line <8 and p:line <= 14 and p:site != away and season > 2012 and o:PRSW > 3 and 3 > ats streak > -4 and p:points > 6 and PRSW < 9 and site!= home and D and ono:PRSW<5 and total<=58 (TCU at 80+%)

S(W@team and conference=o:conference, N=18)<3 and HFC and line>-14 and season>2003  (TEM at 70+%)

week=8 and ats streak>4 and H (2nd for IWST, 3rd for Army, 2nd for IND ,  BYU ,MRSH ,CIN all 60%)

ats streak<-3 and D and season>2009 and o:wins>2 and week=8 (this could be a good go against SU AIF,GEO,NCST 9-34)

week=8 and line<8 and HD and season>2019 and 6>t:wins>1 and 0>ats streak>-3 and o:losses>0 and n:A ( small but 7-0  ORST,WVA,ILL,CSTC

week = 8 and HF and line >= -14 and tS(W@H, N=3) =3 and tA(W) > oA(W) and oS(W@A, N=2) = 0.0 (good UN) SJST-WYO and TXT-BAY

HD and tA(rushing yards-o:rushing yards) - oA(rushing yards-o:rushing yards) > 30 and week = 8 and C and division = FBS and line < 14 and o:wins < 5 ( 2nd for NEV 60+%)

Well Indigo so far I have 2 for IND,Iowa,NEV,IWST & 3 for Army all over 60%

English please 

let the grownups talk…. You’re too stupid and new to gambling to understand what’s happening…. 

@Eprince

 It is a little confusing , Please Breakdown like indigo999.  

@Indigo999

 Bol this week

Will try in the future I'm trying to plug in as many as I can for Indigo , but all the games below except maybe a OV-Un have hit at 60% or better, so all these teams are at 60% or better for this week and some like Army hit more , Indigo's a good writer I just plug them in and give a % so the teams below are or should be at 60% or better.

Army showed up 3 times

IOWA ,IND, NEV, IWST showed up 2 times

the rest showed uo once unless I missed something but all are at least 60%

WIS

Tulane

FLST

TCU

Temple

BYU

Marshall

CIN

ORST

WVA

ILL

CSTC

OV-UN games

NEV-FRES UN

TLN- Rice OV

IWST-CFL OV

Army-ECAR OV

IND-NEB OV

IOWA-MCST OV

SJST-WYO UN

TXT-BAY UN

Army also has a good UN 

Thanks for that .....for whatever reason, I've not done well with getting o/u high percentage queries to produce winners, whether it's NFL, NCAA FB or any other sport, so I've basically given up on them...this year in the KOC contest I'm at 50% in totals, which is actually better than some seasons.

Betting/winning is aggravating enough without  producing losers in one aspect of a bettor's existence.

The past week I went 11-5 on my college games, for which I am a grateful for.....the losers included Ball State -6.5 who gave up touchdowns on 3rd and 22, 3rd and 28 and 4th and 5 in about the last 7 minutes of the game.  UTSA who gave up the winning 18 yard TD with four seconds left after allowing their opponent to drive the length of the field in the last minute of the game....and finally North Carolina +5.5 when they allowed a 60 yard touchdown run in the last minute of the game when it looked like their opponent, Georgia Tech was content to play for overtime.....the life of a bettor!!....we'll expect the gambling gods to throw us a bone this weekend.....

A couple of NHL hockey angles...food for thought on Tuesday.

1)  Away favorites before game 8 off an away win the night before versus an opponent with at least one day's rest have gone 3-7 straight up, and 1-9 to the puckline....VERSUS Florida Panthers

2)  Teams that start out 3-0 are 10-1 as home favorites playing with one day's rest, as long as their present opponent is playing on one or two day's rest.....ON Stars, Flames

Tweaking one of the before mentioned queries....NCAA FB

5) We play an away conference dog of less than 14 points on Saturdays that has lost their last two away games, playing a team that has played three home games, losing at least one (which eliminates my earlier Wyoming play as their present opponent, SJ State has won all three of their home games).  We stipulate that our play-on team hasn't won two games EXACT for their season so far, and that their opponent has won at least one game.

38-7-1 ATS.......(+9.3), 24-22 straight up.....ON UCLA, Central Michigan, Toledo, UAB

AD and week = 8 and line < 14 and division = FBS and tS(W@A, N=2) = 0 and C and oS(W@H, N=3) < 3 and t:wins!= 2 and o:wins>0

p:HF and p:dpa > 5 and p:dps>15 and rank = None and week=8 and site = away ( a small one 1-6 SU -11.1 and 1-6 ats -5.7 ) ON UTST