Just locked in my only play for tomorrow. First 2 unit play of the bowl season here.
Nebraska -13.5
I love that I'm laying less than 2 touchdowns here. I see the huskers winning by 21-28 points in a total dismantling of the Huskies. Look at their matchup September 18th, 56-21 and that was at Washington same song, same dance
turn out the lights the parties over, they say that all good things must end, turn out the lights the parties over
I would love to hear more from all you cover members out there. All thoughts, opinions, leans and plays are welcome.
I will be traveling all day tomorrow and won't be able to check in until tomorrow night.
Cheers to a profitable day tomorrow
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Just locked in my only play for tomorrow. First 2 unit play of the bowl season here.
Nebraska -13.5
I love that I'm laying less than 2 touchdowns here. I see the huskers winning by 21-28 points in a total dismantling of the Huskies. Look at their matchup September 18th, 56-21 and that was at Washington same song, same dance
turn out the lights the parties over, they say that all good things must end, turn out the lights the parties over
I would love to hear more from all you cover members out there. All thoughts, opinions, leans and plays are welcome.
I will be traveling all day tomorrow and won't be able to check in until tomorrow night.
gl..i'm on the opposite side here. I think washington shows up and puts some points on the board. I love they are playing on the west coast...i like the OVER the best. I think locker will have a big day...wash has won 3 in a row and taking confidence into the bowl game.
0
gl..i'm on the opposite side here. I think washington shows up and puts some points on the board. I love they are playing on the west coast...i like the OVER the best. I think locker will have a big day...wash has won 3 in a row and taking confidence into the bowl game.
washington beat the lower tier of the pac-10 last three games to get up to .500 6-6. look at what happened the 3 games before that against the best of the pac-10. they got fucking SMASHED
0
washington beat the lower tier of the pac-10 last three games to get up to .500 6-6. look at what happened the 3 games before that against the best of the pac-10. they got fucking SMASHED
Cal finished 5-7... you can make the argument playing at any opposing team in the Pac-10 or any other major conference is no easy task. I don't buy it. I don't see how one could label this a revenge game either when the first game was a complete blowout!
0
Cal finished 5-7... you can make the argument playing at any opposing team in the Pac-10 or any other major conference is no easy task. I don't buy it. I don't see how one could label this a revenge game either when the first game was a complete blowout!
You think Neb is excited about playing this game? A team they have already blown out in a bullshit pre-New Years bowl?? Washington, is on a small roll, and has a LOT to prove to make-up for that embarrassment earlier in the year. I think Neb wins, but not by 13.5....
0
You think Neb is excited about playing this game? A team they have already blown out in a bullshit pre-New Years bowl?? Washington, is on a small roll, and has a LOT to prove to make-up for that embarrassment earlier in the year. I think Neb wins, but not by 13.5....
You think Neb is excited about playing this game? A team they have already blown out in a bullshit pre-New Years bowl?? Washington, is on a small roll, and has a LOT to prove to make-up for that embarrassment earlier in the year. I think Neb wins, but not by 13.5....
No they do not want to be in this bowl but the talent level desparity is alarming in these 2 teams.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sabanade:
You think Neb is excited about playing this game? A team they have already blown out in a bullshit pre-New Years bowl?? Washington, is on a small roll, and has a LOT to prove to make-up for that embarrassment earlier in the year. I think Neb wins, but not by 13.5....
No they do not want to be in this bowl but the talent level desparity is alarming in these 2 teams.
I think using multiple question marks gives the appearance that you lack a cock, but have a large vagina.
If this blatant comment that has absolutely nothing to do with my play or sports in general would be posted on Pucku's thread the person would be instantly kicked off.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GAM:
I think using multiple question marks gives the appearance that you lack a cock, but have a large vagina.
If this blatant comment that has absolutely nothing to do with my play or sports in general would be posted on Pucku's thread the person would be instantly kicked off.
Double digit bowl dogs coming off winning their last game take the cash 74% of the time since 1980. Also, UW #2 strength of schedule vs. Neb #28. UW very confident right now, and know to roll Locker out instead of statue in the pocket like last game. locker playing for draft position and millions of dollars tonight.
Nebraska in a close one.
0
Double digit bowl dogs coming off winning their last game take the cash 74% of the time since 1980. Also, UW #2 strength of schedule vs. Neb #28. UW very confident right now, and know to roll Locker out instead of statue in the pocket like last game. locker playing for draft position and millions of dollars tonight.
I think using multiple question marks gives the appearance that you lack a cock, but have a large vagina.
THIS GUY IS AN IDIOT ..... AND SO ARE THE MODS THAT MAKE THIS GUY A CAPTAIN.
I HAVE BEEN SAYING IT FOR A LONG TIME ............ Intelligent post's that actually have something to say should make a person grade or status .. not the number of post some idiot makes !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by GAM:
I think using multiple question marks gives the appearance that you lack a cock, but have a large vagina.
THIS GUY IS AN IDIOT ..... AND SO ARE THE MODS THAT MAKE THIS GUY A CAPTAIN.
I HAVE BEEN SAYING IT FOR A LONG TIME ............ Intelligent post's that actually have something to say should make a person grade or status .. not the number of post some idiot makes !!
John....Handicapping the bowls is like handicapping the NFL exhibition games...So many variables....I only use angles/systems and here I don't see the "motivation for Nebraska"....They wanted a much bigger bowl....Your logic is good and handicaping too, and in the past I have done a lot of that, but I just use what I said above....I don't play every game, and now I see a big trend developing.....Best of luck buddy....7-3 in bowls so far, with 6 picks today...Double digit favs. are 2-1 so far....(BOISE ST....BYU...WINNERS.....TULSA(DOG WINNER!)....Tonight it evens up!
0
John....Handicapping the bowls is like handicapping the NFL exhibition games...So many variables....I only use angles/systems and here I don't see the "motivation for Nebraska"....They wanted a much bigger bowl....Your logic is good and handicaping too, and in the past I have done a lot of that, but I just use what I said above....I don't play every game, and now I see a big trend developing.....Best of luck buddy....7-3 in bowls so far, with 6 picks today...Double digit favs. are 2-1 so far....(BOISE ST....BYU...WINNERS.....TULSA(DOG WINNER!)....Tonight it evens up!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.