Thanks for the post, I appreciate your sentiment. We have some great posters in this forum, I'm just happy to be able to help contribute to a few winning plays every now and then. This season cant get here fast enough, Ive gone through a little summer slump. Yeah, my listed teams are official plays. Ill post a few here and there as I'm able to break the games down through the week. Lets have a great season buddy
Thanks for the post, I appreciate your sentiment. We have some great posters in this forum, I'm just happy to be able to help contribute to a few winning plays every now and then. This season cant get here fast enough, Ive gone through a little summer slump. Yeah, my listed teams are official plays. Ill post a few here and there as I'm able to break the games down through the week. Lets have a great season buddy
BOL this season AMD
You're going down in fantasy football this season
I cant wait for our league to get started, dj....gonna be a good time. Have a great season
BOL this season AMD
You're going down in fantasy football this season
I cant wait for our league to get started, dj....gonna be a good time. Have a great season
It should be a good start for us, 85
It should be a good start for us, 85
Watch out for NW. Venric Mark, starting RB, transferred. This probably isn't their biggest lose as Treyvon Green should be able to come fairly close to filling his shoes in this offense. The big lose I believe comes to Christian Jones who is lost for the year. With Siemian getting the call to be the full time starter I think the WR lose is big. I know Siemian has started in the past and saw the field but losing a wide out like that hurts.
With all that said Cal is going to be horrible. Cal's offense will be decent and be able to score but that defense is terrible. I am not sure if its a good thing Cal has returning starters on defense. I couldn't play this first game with the injuries and NW having to travel 4:30 hours out west.
I appreciate your thoughts, thanks for your post. Losing Marc is tough but it would be worse if Nw wasn't running a spread offense. I, obviously, still believe Nw will move the ball against a Cal team who lost 3 LB's for the year as well as their safety. To note, Cal's rb also broke his foot last week. If Cal had an advantage with their O line, I could imagine that Cals speed on the outside might put points on the board but Nw will nix the speed with an inside pass rush. I like Nws defensive front this season. More than anything, I like Nw's offensive matchup vs Cals defense. I think Cal will be worn and time of possession will be a huge mismatch.
Watch out for NW. Venric Mark, starting RB, transferred. This probably isn't their biggest lose as Treyvon Green should be able to come fairly close to filling his shoes in this offense. The big lose I believe comes to Christian Jones who is lost for the year. With Siemian getting the call to be the full time starter I think the WR lose is big. I know Siemian has started in the past and saw the field but losing a wide out like that hurts.
With all that said Cal is going to be horrible. Cal's offense will be decent and be able to score but that defense is terrible. I am not sure if its a good thing Cal has returning starters on defense. I couldn't play this first game with the injuries and NW having to travel 4:30 hours out west.
I appreciate your thoughts, thanks for your post. Losing Marc is tough but it would be worse if Nw wasn't running a spread offense. I, obviously, still believe Nw will move the ball against a Cal team who lost 3 LB's for the year as well as their safety. To note, Cal's rb also broke his foot last week. If Cal had an advantage with their O line, I could imagine that Cals speed on the outside might put points on the board but Nw will nix the speed with an inside pass rush. I like Nws defensive front this season. More than anything, I like Nw's offensive matchup vs Cals defense. I think Cal will be worn and time of possession will be a huge mismatch.
I don,t know why everybody have the LSU C (sounds like rock.) in their mouth.LSU run defense isn't all that once one look deep into the numbers. Secondly, this LSU team will be worst this year due to losses to graduation and NFL. Wisky has one of the best offensive lines in college football and the best running backs duo in the country. Wisconsin will control the ball and miss in a controlled passing game. This game will be closer than most think. But why play this game, better games are out there.
Da Pun.
I don,t know why everybody have the LSU C (sounds like rock.) in their mouth.LSU run defense isn't all that once one look deep into the numbers. Secondly, this LSU team will be worst this year due to losses to graduation and NFL. Wisky has one of the best offensive lines in college football and the best running backs duo in the country. Wisconsin will control the ball and miss in a controlled passing game. This game will be closer than most think. But why play this game, better games are out there.
Da Pun.
I don,t know why everybody have the LSU C (sounds like rock.) in their mouth.LSU run defense isn't all that once one look deep into the numbers. Secondly, this LSU team will be worst this year due to losses to graduation and NFL. Wisky has one of the best offensive lines in college football and the best running backs duo in the country. Wisconsin will control the ball and miss in a controlled passing game. This game will be closer than most think. But why play this game, better games are out there.
Da Pun.
Where do I start?
In response to your statement regarding Wisconsin having one of the best offensive lines in college football....well, I guess you cant get any more subjective than that. However, lets assume Wisconsin does have a great line up front. Do you think the Badgers will be able to handle 8 and 9 guys in the box because that's exactly what we will be seeing all day against an inexperienced QB who has to deal with playing with a green group of receivers. I want no part of a one dimensional Wisconsin offense. And, what are your thoughts regarding a Wisconsin defense that is only returning a handful of starters?
Obviously, LSU is a square play but in this case, I have no problem playing square. I just don't see enough upside to back a very young Wisconsin team on a short line, albeit, at home.
I don,t know why everybody have the LSU C (sounds like rock.) in their mouth.LSU run defense isn't all that once one look deep into the numbers. Secondly, this LSU team will be worst this year due to losses to graduation and NFL. Wisky has one of the best offensive lines in college football and the best running backs duo in the country. Wisconsin will control the ball and miss in a controlled passing game. This game will be closer than most think. But why play this game, better games are out there.
Da Pun.
Where do I start?
In response to your statement regarding Wisconsin having one of the best offensive lines in college football....well, I guess you cant get any more subjective than that. However, lets assume Wisconsin does have a great line up front. Do you think the Badgers will be able to handle 8 and 9 guys in the box because that's exactly what we will be seeing all day against an inexperienced QB who has to deal with playing with a green group of receivers. I want no part of a one dimensional Wisconsin offense. And, what are your thoughts regarding a Wisconsin defense that is only returning a handful of starters?
Obviously, LSU is a square play but in this case, I have no problem playing square. I just don't see enough upside to back a very young Wisconsin team on a short line, albeit, at home.
Im close to pulling the trigger on Georgia. I lean with Arkansas +21. I don't have an opinion on the side of the Bama game but the under is worth a look. Thanks for the post
Im close to pulling the trigger on Georgia. I lean with Arkansas +21. I don't have an opinion on the side of the Bama game but the under is worth a look. Thanks for the post
Im close to pulling the trigger on Georgia. I lean with Arkansas +21. I don't have an opinion on the side of the Bama game but the under is worth a look. Thanks for the post
I absolutely agree that Alabama/West Virginia staying UNDER 55.5. If I had to play a side, I would take the points.
Im close to pulling the trigger on Georgia. I lean with Arkansas +21. I don't have an opinion on the side of the Bama game but the under is worth a look. Thanks for the post
I absolutely agree that Alabama/West Virginia staying UNDER 55.5. If I had to play a side, I would take the points.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.