Boom, Looking for some input.....I must be missing something. What do you like about Purdue? With only a few weeks before kickoff, a new coaching staff, no starting QB decided on, and a completely inexperienced receiving corps, I see them heading into this road game with several question marks. Like jdnmoney said, they deserved a look at 14.5, but I feel this number is settling in the wrong direction.
0
Boom, Looking for some input.....I must be missing something. What do you like about Purdue? With only a few weeks before kickoff, a new coaching staff, no starting QB decided on, and a completely inexperienced receiving corps, I see them heading into this road game with several question marks. Like jdnmoney said, they deserved a look at 14.5, but I feel this number is settling in the wrong direction.
Thoughts on the Clem/UGA O/U 68 (like someone predicted on the dot ). I know you said you would take the U60ish.....Is the Clemson D gonna be able to contain the Bulldogs?
Dont think I can back Purdue or TCU.....but dont know if I can go the other way either.....
0
Thoughts on the Clem/UGA O/U 68 (like someone predicted on the dot ). I know you said you would take the U60ish.....Is the Clemson D gonna be able to contain the Bulldogs?
Dont think I can back Purdue or TCU.....but dont know if I can go the other way either.....
Boom, Looking for some input.....I must be missing something. What do you like about Purdue? With only a few weeks before kickoff, a new coaching staff, no starting QB decided on, and a completely inexperienced receiving corps, I see them heading into this road game with several question marks. Like jdnmoney said, they deserved a look at 14.5, but I feel this number is settling in the wrong direction.
To me this is an easy play.... Wilson is doing a great job IMO. I think he will take this team bowling this season and with all of the returning starters on both sides I think this line will be covered early in the 2nd quarter.
To me this is a team that has something that they haven't had in many years. Confidence. If you go back and not look directly at wins/losses....this team IMO, started playing much better down the stretch. They have potential on offense of course the question is can they stay consistent enough on defense....and in this game, I think they do.
Indiana 48 Indiana st 17
0
Quote Originally Posted by IndyHoosier:
Boom, Looking for some input.....I must be missing something. What do you like about Purdue? With only a few weeks before kickoff, a new coaching staff, no starting QB decided on, and a completely inexperienced receiving corps, I see them heading into this road game with several question marks. Like jdnmoney said, they deserved a look at 14.5, but I feel this number is settling in the wrong direction.
To me this is an easy play.... Wilson is doing a great job IMO. I think he will take this team bowling this season and with all of the returning starters on both sides I think this line will be covered early in the 2nd quarter.
To me this is a team that has something that they haven't had in many years. Confidence. If you go back and not look directly at wins/losses....this team IMO, started playing much better down the stretch. They have potential on offense of course the question is can they stay consistent enough on defense....and in this game, I think they do.
Thoughts on the Clem/UGA O/U 68 (like someone predicted on the dot ). I know you said you would take the U60ish.....Is the Clemson D gonna be able to contain the Bulldogs?
Dont think I can back Purdue or TCU.....but dont know if I can go the other way either.....
you know me...you know me with totals....
Look, this total is absurd. This is IMO is a week one suckers bet... This game isn't going over. Like I said before I see a defense here in Clemson that most dont get to see.... make on mistake about it. Georgia is among the 5 best offenses in the country...but so is Clemson.
The depth and experience of the Clemson front 7 is the best it's been in almost 7 or 8 years. Georgia has 2 great RB's....but if you go back and look at the history of Clemson's defense in at least recent years.... they hold up very good against the Pro style attack. That's just a little "insiders" tip....
Wait until the day of the game......play the under.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
Thoughts on the Clem/UGA O/U 68 (like someone predicted on the dot ). I know you said you would take the U60ish.....Is the Clemson D gonna be able to contain the Bulldogs?
Dont think I can back Purdue or TCU.....but dont know if I can go the other way either.....
you know me...you know me with totals....
Look, this total is absurd. This is IMO is a week one suckers bet... This game isn't going over. Like I said before I see a defense here in Clemson that most dont get to see.... make on mistake about it. Georgia is among the 5 best offenses in the country...but so is Clemson.
The depth and experience of the Clemson front 7 is the best it's been in almost 7 or 8 years. Georgia has 2 great RB's....but if you go back and look at the history of Clemson's defense in at least recent years.... they hold up very good against the Pro style attack. That's just a little "insiders" tip....
Wait until the day of the game......play the under.
With you on Bama; maybe the safest play on the Board. Should be with you on Clemson; but been burned by them a little too recently to pull the trigger yet - love the situation for the Tigers though. May join on the under ....
GW
0
With you on Bama; maybe the safest play on the Board. Should be with you on Clemson; but been burned by them a little too recently to pull the trigger yet - love the situation for the Tigers though. May join on the under ....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.