As predicted in last weeks thread Michigan backers heading for the brown paper bad with cut out eyes and nose. No way in hell I back Rutgers now this is a team Mich can beat and have done so in the past. As predictted last week Michiganis bad but is up trending for a few games as far as I am concerned.
As predicted in last weeks thread Michigan backers heading for the brown paper bad with cut out eyes and nose. No way in hell I back Rutgers now this is a team Mich can beat and have done so in the past. As predictted last week Michiganis bad but is up trending for a few games as far as I am concerned.
Great job as usual BWS77 and The Hawk, as well as a few of you second stringers. Here is a stat that probably our old friend BookieAssassin knows about, but few of the rest of you are tracking...
Net Turnover Margin
A few notables from Saturday's contests...
Ragin Cajuns +4
Mean Green +4
San Jose State +4
UCLA +4
Badgie +4
Illini +3
App State +2
Ball U +2
Boston College +2
Every one of these squads either covered or won straight up. Some of the posters in this thread mentioned the ridiculous straight up wins, like San Jose and UCLA, which is why I'm posting this screed in this thread. Full disclosure - I owned a ticket with UCLA +700 on the moneyline. Exchanged it for cash this morning, but have an image of it for you disbelievers. Anyway, turnovers are a huge benefit or problem depending on which side you bet.
Take a look at the 139 Ragin Cajuns going to Statesboro Saturday to play 140 Georgia Southern. Consider this matchup in the context of the luck factor created by winning the turnover battle. Georgia Southern enjoyed a bye week and runs the triple option...and very nearly upset the Gophers, last time out. I capped the upcoming game and think the line should be a Pick. Yes, I know QB Werts is questionable, but he didn't even play at Minnesota. GASO had 0 turnovers in that contest with the Gophers.
Peace, Out
Great job as usual BWS77 and The Hawk, as well as a few of you second stringers. Here is a stat that probably our old friend BookieAssassin knows about, but few of the rest of you are tracking...
Net Turnover Margin
A few notables from Saturday's contests...
Ragin Cajuns +4
Mean Green +4
San Jose State +4
UCLA +4
Badgie +4
Illini +3
App State +2
Ball U +2
Boston College +2
Every one of these squads either covered or won straight up. Some of the posters in this thread mentioned the ridiculous straight up wins, like San Jose and UCLA, which is why I'm posting this screed in this thread. Full disclosure - I owned a ticket with UCLA +700 on the moneyline. Exchanged it for cash this morning, but have an image of it for you disbelievers. Anyway, turnovers are a huge benefit or problem depending on which side you bet.
Take a look at the 139 Ragin Cajuns going to Statesboro Saturday to play 140 Georgia Southern. Consider this matchup in the context of the luck factor created by winning the turnover battle. Georgia Southern enjoyed a bye week and runs the triple option...and very nearly upset the Gophers, last time out. I capped the upcoming game and think the line should be a Pick. Yes, I know QB Werts is questionable, but he didn't even play at Minnesota. GASO had 0 turnovers in that contest with the Gophers.
Peace, Out
Great job as usual BWS77 and The Hawk, as well as a few of you second stringers. Here is a stat that probably our old friend BookieAssassin knows about, but few of the rest of you are tracking...
Net Turnover Margin
A few notables from Saturday's contests...
Ragin Cajuns +4
Mean Green +4
San Jose State +4
UCLA +4
Badgie +4
Illini +3
App State +2
Ball U +2
Boston College +2
Every one of these squads either covered or won straight up. Some of the posters in this thread mentioned the ridiculous straight up wins, like San Jose and UCLA, which is why I'm posting this screed in this thread. Full disclosure - I owned a ticket with UCLA +700 on the moneyline. Exchanged it for cash this morning, but have an image of it for you disbelievers. Anyway, turnovers are a huge benefit or problem depending on which side you bet.
Take a look at the 139 Ragin Cajuns going to Statesboro Saturday to play 140 Georgia Southern. Consider this matchup in the context of the luck factor created by winning the turnover battle. Georgia Southern enjoyed a bye week and runs the triple option...and very nearly upset the Gophers, last time out. I capped the upcoming game and think the line should be a Pick. Yes, I know QB Werts is questionable, but he didn't even play at Minnesota. GASO had 0 turnovers in that contest with the Gophers.
Peace, Out
Great job as usual BWS77 and The Hawk, as well as a few of you second stringers. Here is a stat that probably our old friend BookieAssassin knows about, but few of the rest of you are tracking...
Net Turnover Margin
A few notables from Saturday's contests...
Ragin Cajuns +4
Mean Green +4
San Jose State +4
UCLA +4
Badgie +4
Illini +3
App State +2
Ball U +2
Boston College +2
Every one of these squads either covered or won straight up. Some of the posters in this thread mentioned the ridiculous straight up wins, like San Jose and UCLA, which is why I'm posting this screed in this thread. Full disclosure - I owned a ticket with UCLA +700 on the moneyline. Exchanged it for cash this morning, but have an image of it for you disbelievers. Anyway, turnovers are a huge benefit or problem depending on which side you bet.
Take a look at the 139 Ragin Cajuns going to Statesboro Saturday to play 140 Georgia Southern. Consider this matchup in the context of the luck factor created by winning the turnover battle. Georgia Southern enjoyed a bye week and runs the triple option...and very nearly upset the Gophers, last time out. I capped the upcoming game and think the line should be a Pick. Yes, I know QB Werts is questionable, but he didn't even play at Minnesota. GASO had 0 turnovers in that contest with the Gophers.
Peace, Out
Indeed, yes BWS. You are one of the sharper guys around this cesspool, so I am quite confident you know what's up. But the analyses did not specifically mention this detail. BTW, the link you posted was "from an unapproved source." Shame on you. You should know better than to post such stuff.
Cheers Brother - I hope you crush it this week!
Indeed, yes BWS. You are one of the sharper guys around this cesspool, so I am quite confident you know what's up. But the analyses did not specifically mention this detail. BTW, the link you posted was "from an unapproved source." Shame on you. You should know better than to post such stuff.
Cheers Brother - I hope you crush it this week!
Indeed, yes BWS. You are one of the sharper guys around this cesspool, so I am quite confident you know what's up. But the analyses did not specifically mention this detail. BTW, the link you posted was "from an unapproved source." Shame on you. You should know better than to post such stuff.
Cheers Brother - I hope you crush it this week!
Indeed, yes BWS. You are one of the sharper guys around this cesspool, so I am quite confident you know what's up. But the analyses did not specifically mention this detail. BTW, the link you posted was "from an unapproved source." Shame on you. You should know better than to post such stuff.
Cheers Brother - I hope you crush it this week!
Missed this post.
Joe "cannon arm" Milton is the backup. Throws the ball with velocity, usually right threw a defender's hands.
Missed this post.
Joe "cannon arm" Milton is the backup. Throws the ball with velocity, usually right threw a defender's hands.
Missed this post.
Joe "cannon arm" Milton is the backup. Throws the ball with velocity, usually right threw a defender's hands.
Missed this post.
Joe "cannon arm" Milton is the backup. Throws the ball with velocity, usually right threw a defender's hands.
I think someone said the same thing about Slovis (v. Daniels) after the Stanford game. The talent at SC has to be top 5 or near it.
I think someone said the same thing about Slovis (v. Daniels) after the Stanford game. The talent at SC has to be top 5 or near it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.