i understand how conflicted you must be especially if you really believe mizzu defense and qb are better.
as an admitted sooner fan that plays thier games ats almost every week to strong results (right side every game but air force) i am not as well informed regarding mizzu as you are, but that said its definitely a homer comment to state Gabbard is the better QB, in contrast i think you over rate murray who runs with absolutely no passion and is playing out the string to collect a signing bonus.
as for your assessment of broyels id argue thats your most glaring oversight, he is a special college reciever and will catch 10+ balls for 100+yds and 1+ td's, not my opinion, as much as mathematical probability.
as for your defense, i hope your accounting for the opp mizzu has seen which w out exception has been bad offenses. A&M is not an exception.
i do agree w/you assessment of the line (and more so the movement being odd) but i am swayed by the arguement that recent history has skewed public perception about top teams "having to lose on road to mid ranked opp catching Pts"
i believe ou travels w a far superior qp (btween 5-6 best in country)
a coaching staff that hates mizzu and thier staff
and a group of grossly superior atheletes who've played top 5 schedule in country so far.
that said they have a putrid o-line, an overated cant run up the middle tb, and a back 7 on def that plays fast but out of position.
could they lose in columbia, absolutely...would predicting it based on history or atheletes be wise, no. A play on mizzu or a win w mizzu for that matter is purely situational (my favorite single betting criteria) which im playing opp this week.
i understand how conflicted you must be especially if you really believe mizzu defense and qb are better.
as an admitted sooner fan that plays thier games ats almost every week to strong results (right side every game but air force) i am not as well informed regarding mizzu as you are, but that said its definitely a homer comment to state Gabbard is the better QB, in contrast i think you over rate murray who runs with absolutely no passion and is playing out the string to collect a signing bonus.
as for your assessment of broyels id argue thats your most glaring oversight, he is a special college reciever and will catch 10+ balls for 100+yds and 1+ td's, not my opinion, as much as mathematical probability.
as for your defense, i hope your accounting for the opp mizzu has seen which w out exception has been bad offenses. A&M is not an exception.
i do agree w/you assessment of the line (and more so the movement being odd) but i am swayed by the arguement that recent history has skewed public perception about top teams "having to lose on road to mid ranked opp catching Pts"
i believe ou travels w a far superior qp (btween 5-6 best in country)
a coaching staff that hates mizzu and thier staff
and a group of grossly superior atheletes who've played top 5 schedule in country so far.
that said they have a putrid o-line, an overated cant run up the middle tb, and a back 7 on def that plays fast but out of position.
could they lose in columbia, absolutely...would predicting it based on history or atheletes be wise, no. A play on mizzu or a win w mizzu for that matter is purely situational (my favorite single betting criteria) which im playing opp this week.
i understand how conflicted you must be especially if you really believe mizzu defense and qb are better.
as an admitted sooner fan that plays thier games ats almost every week to strong results (right side every game but air force) i am not as well informed regarding mizzu as you are, but that said its definitely a homer comment to state Gabbard is the better QB, in contrast i think you over rate murray who runs with absolutely no passion and is playing out the string to collect a signing bonus.
as for your assessment of broyels id argue thats your most glaring oversight, he is a special college reciever and will catch 10+ balls for 100+yds and 1+ td's, not my opinion, as much as mathematical probability.
as for your defense, i hope your accounting for the opp mizzu has seen which w out exception has been bad offenses. A&M is not an exception.
i do agree w/you assessment of the line (and more so the movement being odd) but i am swayed by the arguement that recent history has skewed public perception about top teams "having to lose on road to mid ranked opp catching Pts"
i believe ou travels w a far superior qp (btween 5-6 best in country)
a coaching staff that hates mizzu and thier staff
and a group of grossly superior atheletes who've played top 5 schedule in country so far.
that said they have a putrid o-line, an overated cant run up the middle tb, and a back 7 on def that plays fast but out of position.
could they lose in columbia, absolutely...would predicting it based on history or atheletes be wise, no. A play on mizzu or a win w mizzu for that matter is purely situational (my favorite single betting criteria) which im playing opp this week.
i understand how conflicted you must be especially if you really believe mizzu defense and qb are better.
as an admitted sooner fan that plays thier games ats almost every week to strong results (right side every game but air force) i am not as well informed regarding mizzu as you are, but that said its definitely a homer comment to state Gabbard is the better QB, in contrast i think you over rate murray who runs with absolutely no passion and is playing out the string to collect a signing bonus.
as for your assessment of broyels id argue thats your most glaring oversight, he is a special college reciever and will catch 10+ balls for 100+yds and 1+ td's, not my opinion, as much as mathematical probability.
as for your defense, i hope your accounting for the opp mizzu has seen which w out exception has been bad offenses. A&M is not an exception.
i do agree w/you assessment of the line (and more so the movement being odd) but i am swayed by the arguement that recent history has skewed public perception about top teams "having to lose on road to mid ranked opp catching Pts"
i believe ou travels w a far superior qp (btween 5-6 best in country)
a coaching staff that hates mizzu and thier staff
and a group of grossly superior atheletes who've played top 5 schedule in country so far.
that said they have a putrid o-line, an overated cant run up the middle tb, and a back 7 on def that plays fast but out of position.
could they lose in columbia, absolutely...would predicting it based on history or atheletes be wise, no. A play on mizzu or a win w mizzu for that matter is purely situational (my favorite single betting criteria) which im playing opp this week.
im sorry i was imputing the comment by rj in your other thread about better def, to you.
i was at the game where ou won w/fake punt. awesome game (chilly in shorts and t) mizzu can definitey win this game, no question.
im steadfast in my opinion that virtually every positional comparison goes to the sooners w the exception of o-line.
that said outside of OU's history against Mizzu i give all situational/intangible advantage to mizzu.
any feel for the total? im 2-0 on ou totals this year, but havent had strong feeling for any outside of tex and air force and they were both slim covers
im sorry i was imputing the comment by rj in your other thread about better def, to you.
i was at the game where ou won w/fake punt. awesome game (chilly in shorts and t) mizzu can definitey win this game, no question.
im steadfast in my opinion that virtually every positional comparison goes to the sooners w the exception of o-line.
that said outside of OU's history against Mizzu i give all situational/intangible advantage to mizzu.
any feel for the total? im 2-0 on ou totals this year, but havent had strong feeling for any outside of tex and air force and they were both slim covers
i really hope your not going to ride with mizzou. OU will roll and i mean 10+ pts roll ur lil mizzou. like T.O says get the popcorn ready, its gonna be a blowout
i really hope your not going to ride with mizzou. OU will roll and i mean 10+ pts roll ur lil mizzou. like T.O says get the popcorn ready, its gonna be a blowout
there you have your basis in setting this line
there you have your basis in setting this line
Lakers4ever PM'ed and asked if I was gay because he was and was lookin for a good dick to suck. I was flattered, but I dont swing that way.
GL lakers, I'm sure theres a dick with your name on it out there.
Lakers4ever PM'ed and asked if I was gay because he was and was lookin for a good dick to suck. I was flattered, but I dont swing that way.
GL lakers, I'm sure theres a dick with your name on it out there.
Lakers4ever PM'ed and asked if I was gay because he was and was lookin for a good dick to suck. I was flattered, but I dont swing that way.
GL lakers, I'm sure theres a dick with your name on it out there.
Lakers4ever PM'ed and asked if I was gay because he was and was lookin for a good dick to suck. I was flattered, but I dont swing that way.
GL lakers, I'm sure theres a dick with your name on it out there.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.