All Forums | College Football

*** Week 9 NCAA football ***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 42662
Posts: 275
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

Neutral field i'll take Clemson over Bama all day....

Bama struggles (if you can call it that) with 2 things.....atheletic qbs who can throw and/or the spread offense. The defense is full of robots. Terminators take time to process info. Put them in space and their programming has a glitch.....




We have a winner
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by chad77:

Very nice week again Boom..! Congrats on Clemson.! They look like they are gonna actually stay focused week by week this year! You're right on Bama.. We suck! I don't think Bama should be ranked after barely beating a terrible UT team.. Saban should step down, no use for this nonsense to continue any longer.. I'm appalled ! And embarrassed... With that said, my top 4

1) Baylor
2) Bama
3) LSU
4) Stanford

I think this is the top 4 teams in the country.. I think this year is setting up for another Bama / LSU NC game... Ohhhhh wouldn't that be epic, lololololol....


asss clown of the week goes to this guy


Stop posting in my threads guy. I don't approve of you or your asss clown ways.

seriously, get lost. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 2509
Posted: #28
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:



asss clown of the week goes to this guy


Stop posting in my threads guy. I don't approve of you or your asss clown ways.

seriously, get lost. 

LOL down goes Frazier
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 11854
Posted: #29

Boom I've been saying this awhile and it was confirmed in yesterday's game.... Its time for Frank Beamer to be done as Va.Tech HC. Horrid clock management late in the game, Trying a 67 yard FG at the end of regulation. He's looked senile for years on the sideline

And I realize Beamer is the greatest thing to ever happen for Va.Tech he's their biggest blessing..... But now he's their biggest curse. It's time Coach Beamer

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 13947
Posted: #30
Hahahaha Train beat me to it.... I wanted to look like the smart one for once 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by packers1992:

Boom I've been saying this awhile and it was confirmed in yesterday's game.... Its time for Frank Beamer to be done as Va.Tech HC. Horrid clock management late in the game, Trying a 67 yard FG at the end of regulation. He's looked senile for years on the sideline

And I realize Beamer is the greatest thing to ever happen for Va.Tech he's their biggest blessing..... But now he's their biggest curse. It's time Coach Beamer



you're 100% right... Beamer is making too many mistakes. I noticed the clock management the most myself.... 

Good observations
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 5415
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

Neutral field i'll take Clemson over Bama all day....Bama struggles (if you can call it that) with 2 things.....atheletic qbs who can throw and/or the spread offense. The defense is full of robots. Terminators take time to process info. Put them in space and their programming has a glitch.....

Nobody really knows...I'd take Notre Dame 7 out 10 times vs Clemson on neutral field.Irish practically gave Clemson the game with a rainy fumble with their v
Back up Qb.Is Clemson improved since? A lot and I don't think Watson has even scratched the surface with his potential.Watson isn't better than Boykin right now,but by the time he plays his last game at Clemson he will be twice as good.I'd take Boykin over Tommie Frazier at this point.Put Boykin on that 1995( that would have had 15 starters academically inelgible to play in the SEC) and they could've gone .500 in the NFC East..What doesn't Boykin do better than Frazier? He runs and passes better.Don't give me that crock of BS that Frazier was a great leader.He teammates hated him and didn't even vote him Captain.Ask anybody close to Nebraska program...Frazier is a JERK...Clemson Defense is what doesn't get the credit they deserve..Looks like they have 4 Vic Beasley's over there..How do we know how good Clemson is? We probably won't find out until Semis.Dabo is a great coach.He would walk to Tuscaloosa to take that job and Bama could pay him too.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by warcameagle56:


Nobody really knows...I'd take Notre Dame 7 out 10 times vs Clemson on neutral field.Irish practically gave Clemson the game with a rainy fumble with their v
Back up Qb.Is Clemson improved since? A lot and I don't think Watson has even scratched the surface with his potential.Watson isn't better than Boykin right now,but by the time he plays his last game at Clemson he will be twice as good.I'd take Boykin over Tommie Frazier at this point.Put Boykin on that 1995( that would have had 15 starters academically inelgible to play in the SEC) and they could've gone .500 in the NFC East..What doesn't Boykin do better than Frazier? He runs and passes better.Don't give me that crock of BS that Frazier was a great leader.He teammates hated him and didn't even vote him Captain.Ask anybody close to Nebraska program...Frazier is a JERK...Clemson Defense is what doesn't get the credit they deserve..Looks like they have 4 Vic Beasley's over there..How do we know how good Clemson is? We probably won't find out until Semis.Dabo is a great coach.He would walk to Tuscaloosa to take that job and Bama could pay him too.


apparently it only rained on Notre Dame that night...Think before you talk.

N.D gave Clemson the game? At NO POINT did N.D ever lead in that game. Have somewhat of a clue what your talking about before you speak.

I'd take Clemson 10 out of 10 times vs the Irish.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54484
Posted: #34
I would take Boykin over Watson as well....but the Clemson defense is what makes this team dangerous
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #35
adding:

Appalachian st   -23

Clemson  -9.5



More to Come.......


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 5415
Posted: #36
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 500
Posted: #37
Good week man. Let's get it again this week. My week wasn't as good as yours but still had good day. My top 4 is similar but I will say this. Lsu won't be playing for championship. They have 2 loses left to come. Mark that down. I think ohio st will lose to one of the Michigan schools and fsu can beat Clemson. Baylor still has 2-3 games left which they could lose and I think they lose 1 or 2. They haven't played a game where they were challenged yet but it's coming. If Norte dame wins out they could creep in as well. I can also say this about Tennessee. They could easily be undefeated. I think before bama game their 3 loses were by like 10-11 points combined and all in last couple min of game. They are young and headed  in the right direction. You may not like to here it but bama on a neutral field can beat any of these teams. Can they be scored on yes but none of them want to tackle Henry big behind for 4 quarters. Coker is also much better than he gets credit for.My top 4 right now are
1) Baylor 
2) Ohio st. 
3) Clemson 
4) Alabama 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 5611
Posted: #38
Sorry moodyjeremy, but it is obvious you do not get if you think Alabama is a top 4 team, as they are a borderline top 10 team.
SNITCHES end up being bitches, or end up with stitches, and in ditches! #REALITY
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 5835
Posted: #39
The SEC bias media wise has always been because of  Alabama- the media thinks Saban is a god and can do nothing wrong- it gets so old hearing that crap- Take Bama out of the SEC and the SEC love affair ends- As somebody said as well, the worst part is the fans absolutely think they are the best team in football- most are a bunch of redneck hillbillies who only watch Bama- Hopefully LSU beats them so their fans can shut up about another National Championship!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 1273
Posted: #40
This has to be said. I have been keeping this in for years but now it is time for me to call Boom out. First off, you made a bet either last year or two years ago at the end of the college football season. Basically, it was rivalry weekend in which you stated if some teams lost, you would never post again. Clemson being one over South Carolina and the other ones involved the ACC v SEC as well.  I believe Florida losing to Florida State was one of them. YOU LOST ALL 3. Yet, here you are. For those of you idiots that don't handicap their own games and follow Boom, what he gives is his opinion. Not any FACTS whatsoever. Just an OPINION. He has done very well this year but I say that evens out over the course of a year. If he is a true wagerer like he claims, betting that many games, the probability or statistical realism of it is, he will be a little above 50%. That is like flipping a coin.  I have done this for a very long time abd kive to read these threads. garbage, I was running numbers for my unclie in Chicago out of his bars. But I really believe Boom is not giving this forum all his picks. Just my belief. Boom I have much more to come with facts about the schedule and teams that Clemson has faced this year versus UF, LSU & Bama. More to come mi amigo.


 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by blowoutgm:

The SEC bias media wise has always been because of  Alabama- the media thinks Saban is a god and can do nothing wrong- it gets so old hearing that crap- Take Bama out of the SEC and the SEC love affair ends- As somebody said as well, the worst part is the fans absolutely think they are the best team in football- most are a bunch of redneck hillbillies who only watch Bama- Hopefully LSU beats them so their fans can shut up about another National Championship!



I hope LSU beats them silly
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #42
Let me ask this question to the forum..... Would it not be easier to ban idiots like gatorbear?



This is comical.....
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 5835
Posted: #43
Urban- 

Anyone who thinks Baylor can just plug another QB in there and get the same results is not thinking right- Do you know the reps that it takes with those receivers to develop the timing and trust that he had with those guys- I say it affects Baylor much more than people think- Their defense is not championship quality so if that offense drops off(which it will) then Baylor is done- TCU will score at will on them and that game may be my biggest bet this year

Clemson looks good Boom- that defense can win it all and right now they are the most balanced team in college football- 

LSU is getting better QB play and actually throwing the ball downfield which is nice to see- They should be able to get some nice play action against a Bama defense that will be keyed on #7-

Final Four:

LSU, Clemson, TCU, Ohio St. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 1273
Posted: #44
Now that is off my chest. Boom I can read people. That is what I do for a living. You, are an attention seeking egomaniac. Look at your posts. I am the greatest, you want to learn about college football, listen to me. Are YOU KIDDING ME. People on this site are so gullible to believe this BS.  I have forgotten more about college ball than you even know. Have you played. I am sure you will lie and say of course you have. More to come.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #45
blowout -

 LSU has the nations best running back, that by default should help the passing game, but hasn't much so far..... he's getting better but I think he has to improve more for LSU to go where they want to go.

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 1273
Posted: #46
Let me ask this question to the forum..... Would it not be easier to ban idiots like gatorbear?


Why do you respond that way instead of making relevant comments to the points made. Did you or did you not make a statement that if the picks you made last year or 2 years ago lost, you would never post again? That goes to your very personal trustworthiness  SEC, if I was you, I would take away that $500 wager on the Clemson v SEC game because this degenerate will never pay you anyway.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 5835
Posted: #47
gatorbear- 

I bet that many games- probably more- I am killing it this year- why is that so hard to believe? Train bets even more than me and wins so tell me why you find it so hard to believe? Maybe you can't win money betting? Do you even post your picks? Some people do win betting- I bet a heck of a lot more games than people say you can win at but I say fukk them- I take the mutual fund approach instead of the all money in one stock approach- I am going on 23 consecutive profitable years wagering football- I gave Boom shiit when all that happened, had many heated disagreements with him but in the end we talked about it and respect each others football opinions(for the most part) and moved on to where we can discuss football- 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 5611
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by blowoutgm:

Urban- 

Anyone who thinks Baylor can just plug another QB in there and get the same results is not thinking right- Do you know the reps that it takes with those receivers to develop the timing and trust that he had with those guys- I say it affects Baylor much more than people think- Their defense is not championship quality so if that offense drops off(which it will) then Baylor is done- TCU will score at will on them and that game may be my biggest bet this year


Yes you are correct, but I do believe despite what Baylors #1 fan stated, Wahoo, that Baylor is going to be ok, as Briles will have this kid ready to go. He will not be Russell, but I believe he will be efficient enough to get the job done. The kid is no slouch. It will be interesting to see how this situation plays out.

Thank you for the feedback and continued success to ya!
SNITCHES end up being bitches, or end up with stitches, and in ditches! #REALITY
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 5611
Posted: #49
Quote Originally Posted by gatorbear:

Now that is off my chest. Boom I can read people. That is what I do for a living. You, are an attention seeking egomaniac. Look at your posts. I am the greatest, you want to learn about college football, listen to me. Are YOU KIDDING ME. People on this site are so gullible to believe this BS.  I have forgotten more about college ball than you even know. Have you played. I am sure you will lie and say of course you have. More to come.


Say what you want punk, but all he does is win! :)
SNITCHES end up being bitches, or end up with stitches, and in ditches! #REALITY
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 1273
Posted: #50
Blow, statistically, the numbers are not in your favor. The more you wager, the probability gets higher that you will break even or lose. And with the vig, you lose. Do what makes you comfortable. This is a side thing for me. I do very well gambling but is a secondary income. I do not care about you and Boom's relationship, but I have been doing this for a long time and have been quite profitable. I will never show my picks as once it is out in the social media, it is out there. I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO PROVE TO ANYBODY. . Good luck the rest of the year.
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.