All Forums | College Football

What is your best play of the week? Side not total.

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3855
Posts: 40
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 2363
Posted: #26
Georgia Tech -2.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1158
Posted: #27
minn -23.5
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 37891
Posted: #28

OSU-34.5

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 8152
Posted: #29
Air Force + whatever
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 3248
Posted: #30
East Carolina +3.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 1393
Posted: #31
COCKY +17

Since 2004, SC has lost to UGA 6 times by only a 7.6 avge margin of victory....
And this has included NFL caliber QBs under center for UGA....i c nothing in this year to make me believe this is anything over a 2 td game.....
And i wouldnt be surprised to see SC pull the upset (i understand the run defense is garbage...this is a known fact)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 41
Posted: #32
Georgia tech,Kentucky or colorodo state
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 41
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by Lionmonster:

Georgia Tech -2.5
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 41
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by Lionmonster:

Georgia Tech -2.5
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 13189
Posted: #35
Clemson
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 13189
Posted: #36
Or sou Carolina I. Going big on both I think
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 11658
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by gmanusc2001:

COCKY +17

Since 2004, SC has lost to UGA 6 times by only a 7.6 avge margin of victory....
And this has included NFL caliber QBs under center for UGA....i c nothing in this year to make me believe this is anything over a 2 td game.....
And i wouldnt be surprised to see SC pull the upset (i understand the run defense is garbage...this is a known fact)

No disrespect but I always get a kick out of trends like this. What in the world do 2004-2013 contests have anything to do with this team?
Just because UCF beat Baylor in a bowl game a few years ago doesn't have anything to do with them playing this year. GL betting on the Cocks as I haven't seen a single positive note on their season so far.


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 18
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by Rob2772:

Ball St  -6  *****
I like this too, but why is line down to -5.5? was as high as -6.5....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 1393
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by mbiddy:

Quote Originally Posted by gmanusc2001:

COCKY +17Since 2004, SC has lost to UGA 6 times by only a 7.6 avge margin of victory....And this has included NFL caliber QBs under center for UGA....i c nothing in this year to make me believe this is anything over a 2 td game.....And i wouldnt be surprised to see SC pull the upset (i understand the run defense is garbage...this is a known fact)
No disrespect but I always get a kick out of trends like this. What in the world do 2004-2013 contests have anything to do with this team?Just because UCF beat Baylor in a bowl game a few years ago doesn't have anything to do with them playing this year. GL betting on the Cocks as I haven't seen a single positive note on their season so far.


Honestly i do not normally consider trends as a big portion of my handicapping, but thats not to say they never represent an angle...there are many successful cappers who hang their hat on trends....
U have to ask yourself, is this trend a completely meaningless anomaly, or is it a documentable representation of how much more competative the series has been since Spurrier took over 10 years ago.
To the point of no positives....
Would u consider it a defensive positive to hold an offensive minded apponent to 26 total yards on 5 possesions, 4 of which were 3/outs?
Thats what the SC defense did to UK to start the 2nd half of last weeks game.

GLTY.....books are the enemy.
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 11658
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by gmanusc2001:


Would u consider it a defensive positive to hold an offensive minded apponent to 26 total yards on 5 possesions, 4 of which were 3/outs?
Thats what the SC defense did to UK to start the 2nd half of last weeks game.

GLTY.....books are the enemy.


I would if that 'offensive minded' minded team didn't rank 92nd in the country in total offense last year and 67th this year like KY did/is..Not saying the cocks don't cover but I wouldn't touch them with a ten foot pole bc I watched them both games this year and they would struggle to be Kansas this year.

GL to you cuz....nothing but the best


All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.