Who Needs (Playoffs) ??? LSU and Bama are Clearly The BEST
It's nice to see someone on this side of things... It's certainly not the popular opinion around here.
It's nice to see someone on this side of things... It's certainly not the popular opinion around here.
The Bowls are awesome
The Bowls are awesome
I agree they are the two best teams but this means the first matchup was completely meaningless.
I don't see how Bama winning the second match entitles them to the crown. Sorry but a playoff is the only way Bama deserves a shot at the title.
I agree they are the two best teams but this means the first matchup was completely meaningless.
I don't see how Bama winning the second match entitles them to the crown. Sorry but a playoff is the only way Bama deserves a shot at the title.
I agree they are the two best teams but this means the first matchup was completely meaningless.
I don't see how Bama winning the second match entitles them to the crown. Sorry but a playoff is the only way Bama deserves a shot at the title.
I agree they are the two best teams but this means the first matchup was completely meaningless.
I don't see how Bama winning the second match entitles them to the crown. Sorry but a playoff is the only way Bama deserves a shot at the title.
I agree they are the two best teams but this means the first matchup was completely meaningless.
I don't see how Bama winning the second match entitles them to the crown. Sorry but a playoff is the only way Bama deserves a shot at the title.
I agree they are the two best teams but this means the first matchup was completely meaningless.
I don't see how Bama winning the second match entitles them to the crown. Sorry but a playoff is the only way Bama deserves a shot at the title.
but why Alabama? are they *really* a clear #2?
and they already had a chance to beat LSU...at home...and couldnt get it done.
i think another team deserves a chance. of course, if that other team is Stanford then it's going to be a bloodbath :-)
if OKSt beats OU, I think I'd like to see the pokes play the tigers.
Alabama clearly very very talented. No doubt. But, just as the SEC balked at OhioSt/Michigan rematch a few years back, I dont want to see a rematch of these teams. Let another team lose to LSU.
but why Alabama? are they *really* a clear #2?
and they already had a chance to beat LSU...at home...and couldnt get it done.
i think another team deserves a chance. of course, if that other team is Stanford then it's going to be a bloodbath :-)
if OKSt beats OU, I think I'd like to see the pokes play the tigers.
Alabama clearly very very talented. No doubt. But, just as the SEC balked at OhioSt/Michigan rematch a few years back, I dont want to see a rematch of these teams. Let another team lose to LSU.
Based on this reasoning (which I am not saying is wrong) than a LSU / Bama rematch is just a formality.
If LSU beats Georgia than they have already proved to be the best team in the country. Even if they lose to Bama they would still be the best team in the country based on their season vs the Bama season.
And to all my Bama brethren out there -- Roll Tide
Based on this reasoning (which I am not saying is wrong) than a LSU / Bama rematch is just a formality.
If LSU beats Georgia than they have already proved to be the best team in the country. Even if they lose to Bama they would still be the best team in the country based on their season vs the Bama season.
And to all my Bama brethren out there -- Roll Tide
I agree they are the two best teams but this means the first matchup was completely meaningless.
I don't see how Bama winning the second match entitles them to the crown. Sorry but a playoff is the only way Bama deserves a shot at the title.
Thank you. What always seems to get lost in this scenario is how totally unfair it is to the team that won the 1st game. The loser gets a 2nd chance to split the season series 1-1, finish with identical records, and oh yeah...win the national championship.
I agree they are the two best teams but this means the first matchup was completely meaningless.
I don't see how Bama winning the second match entitles them to the crown. Sorry but a playoff is the only way Bama deserves a shot at the title.
Thank you. What always seems to get lost in this scenario is how totally unfair it is to the team that won the 1st game. The loser gets a 2nd chance to split the season series 1-1, finish with identical records, and oh yeah...win the national championship.
I agree they are the two best teams but this means the first matchup was completely meaningless.
I don't see how Bama winning the second match entitles them to the crown. Sorry but a playoff is the only way Bama deserves a shot at the title.
So the NY Giants shouldn't be considered Super Bowl champions a few years back when the Patriots beat them in the regular season? Rematches occur in championship games in every sport. Why do people get so upset if it happens in college football?
I agree they are the two best teams but this means the first matchup was completely meaningless.
I don't see how Bama winning the second match entitles them to the crown. Sorry but a playoff is the only way Bama deserves a shot at the title.
So the NY Giants shouldn't be considered Super Bowl champions a few years back when the Patriots beat them in the regular season? Rematches occur in championship games in every sport. Why do people get so upset if it happens in college football?
LSU easily best team. no matter what happens this weekend IMO they deserve to be in the MNC game
but why Alabama? are they *really* a clear #2?
and they already had a chance to beat LSU...at home...and couldnt get it done.
i think another team deserves a chance. of course, if that other team is Stanford then it's going to be a bloodbath :-)
if OKSt beats OU, I think I'd like to see the pokes play the tigers.
Alabama clearly very very talented. No doubt. But, just as the SEC balked at OhioSt/Michigan rematch a few years back, I dont want to see a rematch of these teams. Let another team lose to LSU.
LSU easily best team. no matter what happens this weekend IMO they deserve to be in the MNC game
but why Alabama? are they *really* a clear #2?
and they already had a chance to beat LSU...at home...and couldnt get it done.
i think another team deserves a chance. of course, if that other team is Stanford then it's going to be a bloodbath :-)
if OKSt beats OU, I think I'd like to see the pokes play the tigers.
Alabama clearly very very talented. No doubt. But, just as the SEC balked at OhioSt/Michigan rematch a few years back, I dont want to see a rematch of these teams. Let another team lose to LSU.
I agree they are the two best teams but this means the first matchup was completely meaningless.
I don't see how Bama winning the second match entitles them to the crown. Sorry but a playoff is the only way Bama deserves a shot at the title.
I agree they are the two best teams but this means the first matchup was completely meaningless.
I don't see how Bama winning the second match entitles them to the crown. Sorry but a playoff is the only way Bama deserves a shot at the title.
Thank you. What always seems to get lost in this scenario is how totally unfair it is to the team that won the 1st game. The loser gets a 2nd chance to split the season series 1-1, finish with identical records, and oh yeah...win the national championship.
Thank you. What always seems to get lost in this scenario is how totally unfair it is to the team that won the 1st game. The loser gets a 2nd chance to split the season series 1-1, finish with identical records, and oh yeah...win the national championship.
So the NY Giants shouldn't be considered Super Bowl champions a few years back when the Patriots beat them in the regular season? Rematches occur in championship games in every sport. Why do people get so upset if it happens in college football?
In regards to the NFL there are a lot fewer teams so there is a lot more overlap between teams and common opponents etc... Also there is a playoff system where the teams the qualify are then entered into a "tournament" and given the chance to fight it out.
For obvious reasons this is not the case in NCAAFB. Too many teams out there and so there is no way for them to play eachother. And so we are always left with a subjective opinion of who deserves to be on the top.
This is why I think that many people have an issue with a rematch... Bama already played LSU and lost.
So the NY Giants shouldn't be considered Super Bowl champions a few years back when the Patriots beat them in the regular season? Rematches occur in championship games in every sport. Why do people get so upset if it happens in college football?
In regards to the NFL there are a lot fewer teams so there is a lot more overlap between teams and common opponents etc... Also there is a playoff system where the teams the qualify are then entered into a "tournament" and given the chance to fight it out.
For obvious reasons this is not the case in NCAAFB. Too many teams out there and so there is no way for them to play eachother. And so we are always left with a subjective opinion of who deserves to be on the top.
This is why I think that many people have an issue with a rematch... Bama already played LSU and lost.
I think that this is also a reason why some people think that Ok St. (if they beat OU) has an argument.
I think that this is also a reason why some people think that Ok St. (if they beat OU) has an argument.
two best teams...yes
two best teams...yes
So the NY Giants shouldn't be considered Super Bowl champions a few years back when the Patriots beat them in the regular season? Rematches occur in championship games in every sport. Why do people get so upset if it happens in college football?
Thanks for proving my point! The Giants made it to the Super Bowl through a playoff. I said the only way Bama deserves it is if they make it through the playoffs. Right now they are being rewarded based on opinions. You lose at home and you are out the way it is currently set up in my opinion. If LSU would have won the first game at home, I could see the argument. Bama lost at home, sorry you don't get rewarded for that!
Getty3 knows what I'm talkin about ![]()
So the NY Giants shouldn't be considered Super Bowl champions a few years back when the Patriots beat them in the regular season? Rematches occur in championship games in every sport. Why do people get so upset if it happens in college football?
Thanks for proving my point! The Giants made it to the Super Bowl through a playoff. I said the only way Bama deserves it is if they make it through the playoffs. Right now they are being rewarded based on opinions. You lose at home and you are out the way it is currently set up in my opinion. If LSU would have won the first game at home, I could see the argument. Bama lost at home, sorry you don't get rewarded for that!
Getty3 knows what I'm talkin about ![]()
![]()
No doubt, I am excited for the bowl games as well. Just not as excited as I would be for a playoff. ![]()
You are still rewarding Bama when they don't deserve another shot. They already lost to that team on their home turf. In my opinion, atleast make them win against some "good" teams to prove they deserve another shot.
![]()
No doubt, I am excited for the bowl games as well. Just not as excited as I would be for a playoff. ![]()
You are still rewarding Bama when they don't deserve another shot. They already lost to that team on their home turf. In my opinion, atleast make them win against some "good" teams to prove they deserve another shot.
Hot Forum Topics
- Monday 10/19/2026 569
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 278,566
- Cowboys vs Packers ingame live 1,588
- NFL LOCKED IN! 109,012
- NFL THREAD * 151 * 25,557
- Week 7 Money 16,372
- Obviously the true face of the republican party 35,320
- Sac's Week 6 Plays 6,133
- America 2025 - 2028: Chronicles of the newest Federal regime and Presidency 34,314
- Don’t take Cowboys 2,524
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
