Well I faded the public last night on the Oregon vs Arizona State game and lost, but made up most of my $$$$ on Arizona State 2nd half. Fading the public hits about 65% of the time.
While betting on UCONN is fading the public, I would take them regardless of the public % on them. Their defense is really good, and Syracuse is not that good. UCONN isnt an offensive jauggernaut, but they will keep this one close. I might buy up the line to +7 or +7.5 just to be safe.
UCONN HUSKIES +5
0
Well I faded the public last night on the Oregon vs Arizona State game and lost, but made up most of my $$$$ on Arizona State 2nd half. Fading the public hits about 65% of the time.
While betting on UCONN is fading the public, I would take them regardless of the public % on them. Their defense is really good, and Syracuse is not that good. UCONN isnt an offensive jauggernaut, but they will keep this one close. I might buy up the line to +7 or +7.5 just to be safe.
I saw you ATL last nite when those conversations were going on, don't know where he was coming from. Oh well, I took ORE -9 too and they put a whuppin' in the SunDevils. They should have put 60pts on ASU but took they're foot off the pedal in the 2nd half.
I like UCONN catching 4.5 pts. I got a score of 29-26 UCONN. I do see the games in the Dome have been close and SYR plays well there, but UCONN plays their opp. tough, with the only big loss to a good RUT team.
I'll take the pts on a Friday nite. GLTA
Haha. Yeah, that dude made no sense. Plus he had no facts to back up any of his bogus post! That's why I proved him wrong! Didn't want people losing there money over lame info. If he comes back on bet against him always!!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by hordman:
I saw you ATL last nite when those conversations were going on, don't know where he was coming from. Oh well, I took ORE -9 too and they put a whuppin' in the SunDevils. They should have put 60pts on ASU but took they're foot off the pedal in the 2nd half.
I like UCONN catching 4.5 pts. I got a score of 29-26 UCONN. I do see the games in the Dome have been close and SYR plays well there, but UCONN plays their opp. tough, with the only big loss to a good RUT team.
I'll take the pts on a Friday nite. GLTA
Haha. Yeah, that dude made no sense. Plus he had no facts to back up any of his bogus post! That's why I proved him wrong! Didn't want people losing there money over lame info. If he comes back on bet against him always!!!!
However, this game I'm staying away. 2 sub par average teams that can't move the ball. Can't see any explosive plays coming from neither team. But I do give a slightly small edge to R. Nassib and the Syracuse Orangeman at home for home field advantage.
0
However, this game I'm staying away. 2 sub par average teams that can't move the ball. Can't see any explosive plays coming from neither team. But I do give a slightly small edge to R. Nassib and the Syracuse Orangeman at home for home field advantage.
?"Syracuse (-4) over Connecticut"- Most games come down to the quarterback and I don't think this game is any different, as neither team has a really strong running game. Nassib and Whitmer have both shown they are prone to errors. Whimter has thrown for over 1500 yards, but this is accompanied by 11 interceptions. Nassib hasn't been with out fault as well throwing for over 1800 yards with 8 interceptions. This game is going to come down to which QB doesn't make mistakes, and I think that QB is going to be Nassib. Nassib takes every game seriously and we have seen some glimpses of quality. Syracuse has played some tough games, and recently held their own against a strong Rutgers running game. The overall statistics for offense and defense are in Connecticut's favor, but they haven't played anyone of merit, skewing the stats. Syracuse has played strong USC, Pittsburgh, and Northwestern teams and has held their own in most of the games. People are talking about Connecticut's defense, but I find them over rated. All these issues are not looking good for Connecticut, and are even more compounded by the fact that they are on the road at The Dome. Not to mention Syracuse is 5-0 ATS in their last five match ups and the home team holds a 6-2 ATS edge. Look for Syracuse to finally pull their whole game together, and pull off at least a 10 point win here. Take the points for Syracuse (-4)?, up to (-7).
Cuse is 0-5 ATS last five against uconn. I'm sure your site has many great free picks like "take the points for Syracuse"
0
Quote Originally Posted by LineLounge:
?"Syracuse (-4) over Connecticut"- Most games come down to the quarterback and I don't think this game is any different, as neither team has a really strong running game. Nassib and Whitmer have both shown they are prone to errors. Whimter has thrown for over 1500 yards, but this is accompanied by 11 interceptions. Nassib hasn't been with out fault as well throwing for over 1800 yards with 8 interceptions. This game is going to come down to which QB doesn't make mistakes, and I think that QB is going to be Nassib. Nassib takes every game seriously and we have seen some glimpses of quality. Syracuse has played some tough games, and recently held their own against a strong Rutgers running game. The overall statistics for offense and defense are in Connecticut's favor, but they haven't played anyone of merit, skewing the stats. Syracuse has played strong USC, Pittsburgh, and Northwestern teams and has held their own in most of the games. People are talking about Connecticut's defense, but I find them over rated. All these issues are not looking good for Connecticut, and are even more compounded by the fact that they are on the road at The Dome. Not to mention Syracuse is 5-0 ATS in their last five match ups and the home team holds a 6-2 ATS edge. Look for Syracuse to finally pull their whole game together, and pull off at least a 10 point win here. Take the points for Syracuse (-4)?, up to (-7).
Cuse is 0-5 ATS last five against uconn. I'm sure your site has many great free picks like "take the points for Syracuse"
o.k. vue i'm with you on this one--even tho I think cuse can cover--your piks are money in the bank so far--but why change a good thing now---huskies for 3 biggies---
0
o.k. vue i'm with you on this one--even tho I think cuse can cover--your piks are money in the bank so far--but why change a good thing now---huskies for 3 biggies---
Two passing squads with downfield potential. Geremy Davis is the real deal. He is due for a few TDs and and whittmer can't continue to turn the ball over like he has. We all know what nassib is capable of. Cuse is allowing 26 points a game on defense so tonight is a good spot for uconn to get on track offensively. I think this game can go either way but I like the over a lot.
Over 43.5 (4 units)
Huskies ML +175 (risking 1 unit)
Get it
0
Two passing squads with downfield potential. Geremy Davis is the real deal. He is due for a few TDs and and whittmer can't continue to turn the ball over like he has. We all know what nassib is capable of. Cuse is allowing 26 points a game on defense so tonight is a good spot for uconn to get on track offensively. I think this game can go either way but I like the over a lot.
These are a couple of down teams this year and one (Connecticut) seems to be further down. That and the fact that the Carrier Dome will be packed and loud giving the Orange a definite home field advantage. I lay the 3, but more convincing to me is under 44 simply based on extremely weak offenses combined with a Connecticut team with a above average defense spells under 44.
0
These are a couple of down teams this year and one (Connecticut) seems to be further down. That and the fact that the Carrier Dome will be packed and loud giving the Orange a definite home field advantage. I lay the 3, but more convincing to me is under 44 simply based on extremely weak offenses combined with a Connecticut team with a above average defense spells under 44.
UCONN coach back in familiar territory. Pasqualoni was the former coach of the Orange. I never was a fan of that cat. And to think I threw a two timer in on his Huskies to keep this one close. Like I always say "Stupid is as stupid does."
0
UCONN coach back in familiar territory. Pasqualoni was the former coach of the Orange. I never was a fan of that cat. And to think I threw a two timer in on his Huskies to keep this one close. Like I always say "Stupid is as stupid does."
Gee this is like picking through the trash to find a winning ticket at the race track.....hate the line now at -5 for Cuse, usually go against teams that are favored by 5 points and have a huge success rate with them not covering. That being said, this might be a play for just the total to take a small shot on something because there isn't shit else to gamble on tonight.
over first half for me, then maybe might make a small play for second half.
0
Gee this is like picking through the trash to find a winning ticket at the race track.....hate the line now at -5 for Cuse, usually go against teams that are favored by 5 points and have a huge success rate with them not covering. That being said, this might be a play for just the total to take a small shot on something because there isn't shit else to gamble on tonight.
over first half for me, then maybe might make a small play for second half.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.