All Forums | College Football

Stanford at Washington (09/27/2012)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 12347
Posts: 74
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 1498
Posted: #26
Stanford -7.5!  Stanford 65 washington 17
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 168
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by holtnt:

With Stanford beating Lane Kiffin’s number two ranked squad last week, tells me this line should be at least 10 – 12 points.  Looks like the Wise Men in Vegas are begging for Stanford dollars so………………..  Put me down for Washington at the house with a touchdown head start for a nickel Alex Trebek please.  Thanks! 


That's what I thought at first....  but when I realize it's a thursday game, Vegas might just GIVE this win away just so those who can't money manage will lose it all saturday or sunday anyways. No one's tried that angle before!!!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 915
Posted: #28
Husky O-line banged up.  Is the Wash.  QB mobile?  If he can avoid the rush (un-like Barkley)  and run some they cna keep this game close at home.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 915
Posted: #29
Price's running stats are not very good.  Anybody know if this kid can scramble if not Cardinal wins and covers.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 390
Posted: #30
I DON'T CARE Where the Public $$ is on this game....Stanford will take no chance losing this game after The major upset of USC....STANFORD -7 in a ROUT!!!to the bank!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 1668
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by ATLiens007:



I'm glad you won cause so did I.  But seriously, you make no sense what so ever!  This has got be the most unprofessional post with no facts at all to back it up!

you are a fucking joke.  unprofessional.  now that is funny.  I have no ideal how this post ended up on this thread I did not post it here, it was in response to a different post on another thread.  and yes I can back it up with proof but choose not too.

take the points and the under in both college and pro games 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 1668
Posted: #32
it is no coincidence that after Monday night the owners made an agreement.  enjoy fantasy land ATLiens007
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 1668
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by thesoulpurpose:

people get so caught up in what vegas wants you to do and that the line looks off and that it's a trap game, forget about all that bullshit, they want washington money and now they got it because people over analyze things,  what people should focus on is that washington lost 41-3 to LSU, they are not that good, stanford's D is for real and they will do the same thing that LSU did to this washington team only not quite as big,   washington will have a very hard time scoring at all. STANFORD -7.

80% of the money in vegas and online books is on Stanford.  69% have Stanford SU probably parlayed with Saturday games.  its a  Thursday  game which changes  things whether you want to believe it or not.  If this game was on a Saturday Stanford would win big.  running game is what you will see with penalties from a short week.  I also think Stanford will have a physical and mental letdown after beating USC and just play good enough to win but not blowout.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 277
Posted: #34
If this game was played on Friday I would take Washington without thinking twice but since it's a Thursday I'll take Stanford. I am really big on underdog Friday but since it's not Friday I'll take Stanford. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2001
Posts: 28
Posted: #35
Stanford -6.5 is great some value at least Stanford  are 3-2 on the road @ Washington.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2003
Posts: 375
Posted: #36
OlivPinc: You're a true handicapping genius.  Okay... Stanford, it is. Thanks.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 310
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by booyahz123:


you are a fucking joke.  unprofessional.  now that is funny.  I have no ideal how this post ended up on this thread I did not post it here, it was in response to a different post on another thread.  and yes I can back it up with proof but choose not too.

take the points and the under in both college and pro games 

Lol. The fucking unprofessional joke is your stoopid post, dummeh!!! Where's fact dummeh! You chose not to cause you have no facts! You don't shit! That's why I quoted your dumb@$$!!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1128
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by booyahz123:


80% of the money in vegas and online books is on Stanford.  69% have Stanford SU probably parlayed with Saturday games.  its a  Thursday  game which changes  things whether you want to believe it or not.  If this game was on a Saturday Stanford would win big.  running game is what you will see with penalties from a short week.  I also think Stanford will have a physical and mental letdown after beating USC and just play good enough to win but not blowout.
 
your 80 percent figure is not accurate, it's more like 65 to 45,  but it does not matter, you mention that thursday games change things, ya ,but it changes things for both teams, like I mentioned earlier STANFORD will beat washington very similar to the way LSU beat them, just not quite as big,  31 to 14 type of thing.  STANFORD -7  they will control from beginning to end and cover without any nervousness from the people that bet on them, 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1128
Posted: #39
I mean 65 to 35 (as opposed to 65 to 45)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 452
Posted: #40
Stanford much better team and Washingtion has alot of injuries.Stanford -7
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 250
Posted: #41
I agree with soulpurpose, as bad as it hurts, UW is gonna lose this game by atleast 14 points. Crazier things have happened but the comparison to LSU and Stanfords DL is accurate. Although LSU's DL is more physical; Stanford has the closest thing to it in the pac12. The only advantage UW has is that it is a home game. :(
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 250
Posted: #42
I will say that UW's defense is better than people think. Just saying... 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 8713
Posted: #43
Stanford 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 770
Posted: #44

stanford beat usc for 3 reasons usc center was out and they changed they line calls,next kiffin whats to sit back in the tampa 2 and does not like to change.3rd usc flew to ny 3000 miles and  back 3000 miles and that GAME HAD A COUPLE HOUR WEATHER delay.Stanford is a good team but do not let the usc game be the focus of your bet tonight. I will pass myself because there are 6 coaches in college ball i will not bet on and 1 of them is on the field tonight and friday night good luck

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 1895
Posted: #45
Stanford in a spot for a natural letdown. Washington a tough place to play...loud...No jake locker to save them but they have a decent defense. They can stop the pass but are weak on the run. Stanford weaker against the pass. Stan will run on em. If wash can get a passing game going it could be back and forth. Tue under lives!!!! So beware the thur espn dog curse son!!! WASH and OV for the large. The doc has spoken.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 2
Posted: #46
I agree with soulpurpose but if u want to be safe I would tease stanford and the under!!!! GOOD LUCK!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 1
Posted: #47
I bought it at 6.5 and otherwise I would of stayed away from it!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35347
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by DrDogs:

Stanford in a spot for a natural letdown. Washington a tough place to play...loud...No jake locker to save them but they have a decent defense. They can stop the pass but are weak on the run. Stanford weaker against the pass. Stan will run on em. If wash can get a passing game going it could be back and forth. Tue under lives!!!! So beware the thur espn dog curse son!!! WASH and OV for the large. The doc has spoken.

It's not really a letdown spot since they had a bye last week.  Friday ESPN home dogs have been hitting the last 2 years, not Thursday.  But good luck anyways  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2003
Posts: 1600
Posted: #49

65% on Stanford and no line movement.

WASHINGTON +7

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 448
Posted: #50
Washington Huskies are 0-5 ATS vs. a team with a winning record.
Huskies are 4-0 ATS in their last 4 games as a favorite of 3.5-10.0.
Huskies are 0-5 ATS in their last 5 games as an underdog.
Cardinal are 4-0 ATS in their last 4 meetings in Washington.
Cardinal are 4-0 ATS in their last 4 meetings.
Favorite is 4-1 ATS in their last 5 meetings

takin' my chances with the cardinals tonight

BOL fellas

anna31204

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.