All Forums | College Football

Washington State at Stanford (10/10/2014)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 8466
Posts: 51
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 61
Posted: #1

Away:  Washington State [3-3 ATS]
Home:  Stanford [2-3 ATS]

Game Time: 9:00 PM
Stadium: Stanford Stadium

Featured Lines

Recent Meetings:
09/28/13 - STAN 55 vs. WSU 17
10/27/12 - WSU 17 vs. STAN 24
10/15/11 - STAN 44 vs. WSU 14

Team Leaders:

Washington State:
Passing: Connor Halliday (3052)
Rushing: Jamal Morrow (187)
Receiving: Vince Mayle (703)

Stanford:
Passing: Kevin Hogan (1041)
Rushing: Remound Wright (180)
Receiving: Ty Montgomery (287)

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 88
Posted: #2
In the last 2 seasons, WSU is 7-0 ATS when they're getting double digit points. No way Stanford can outscore them by 17.5
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 776
Posted: #3
Luv Wash St here......
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 670
Posted: #4
Are those stats right! Does Connor really have 3052 passing yards in 5 games? Wash St look good on paper I'm Leary 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 344
Posted: #5
Stanford has too many problems in the red zone, QB play has been very inconsistent. Wazzou is a defense optional football team that has had issues against teams that play solid D. Gotta like Wazzou to keep it within 17....

Washington St. +17
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3283
Posted: #6
ll take wash.st+21.5(-182)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 281
Posted: #7
Been on this Halliday gun slinger all year and all he does is throw touchdowns. ..reminds me of the case keenum days over at houston. .keep getting points and keep winning bets..i keep this squad on a teaser card all season. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 6
Posted: #8
Stanford secondary was pitiful versus an inaccurate N Dame QB-last week. This kid should burn them if he has time.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 670
Posted: #9
Connor Halliday should be a Dark Horse in the Heisman race 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 21783
Posted: #10
Passing: Connor Halliday (3052) .

Put sum elite recivers along side this kid and then really "LOOKOUT"!

Early lean WSST +17.5
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 98
Posted: #11
I will stay away from this game but I will say that Stanford has disappointed me so far this season. That offense misses those workhorse RBs and the clutch-catching TEs. Wazzu has been money as underdogs so this one should be interesting.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 1723
Posted: #12
Gotta agree with wash at +17.5
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 129
Posted: #13
Washington State wins by 14. Connor will keep throwing and throwing.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 2
Posted: #14
WSU and 17.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 4801
Posted: #15
Since everyone is on Washington State, I'm on Stanford.. Washington State did lose to Nevada on earlier this year on a Friday night game..
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 448
Posted: #16
Stanford for the cash 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 277
Posted: #17
Something I have noticed Washington state like to pass the ball on every down every team that they have face so far this season are terrible against the pass average 30 points or more (some odd reason they didn't score more than 13 vs Nevada). Stanford is second in the nation on pass defense. 

I know that Stanford this season have had a hard time scoring but come on guys, let's not forget that Washington state defense is atrocious. Give me Stanford Large at home. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 915
Posted: #18
WSU with the slinger hasnt scored more than 17 the last 3 yrs. Flip side Hogan & co. have ripped the WSU d two out fo three times IMHO the chances lean that STAN wins this game by there avg 25ppg  -17 small, >17, medium
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 281
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by FleshGordun:

WSU with the slinger hasnt scored more than 17 the last 3 yrs. Flip side Hogan & co. have ripped the WSU d two out fo three times IMHO the chances lean that STAN wins this game by there avg 25ppg  -17 small, >17, medium

Halliday was injured just after the half last year..this will be his first full game vs cardinal. .
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 850
Posted: #20
Wazzou deffense stinks and Stanford should win(desperation),but the Cardinals really stink on offense and will not be surprised of a backdoor cover by WSU. Washington State+17.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 4801
Posted: #21
I'd be surprised if Washington State puts up 14.. But I think Stanford can put up 35..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 4801
Posted: #22
Washington State has given up 215 rushing yards to Rutgers, 214 to Nevada, 178 to Oregon, and 193 to Utah.. 1-3 in those games.. With Stanford's offensive line, how much do you think they run for?? With success in the run game, it makes Hogan's job easier and opens up the play action.. Just some things to think about for this game..
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 126
Posted: #23
i dont see stanford who cant score a touch down 10 yards away from the redzone to cover the 17 so Washington state is my pick 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 154
Posted: #24
Public on Wash st. I'll take a pist off Stanford team with a top 5 defense.  Stanford offense makes me want to puke, but they can run the ball and have plenty of success.  Connor Halliday is no Everett Golson. 
 
Stanford  38
Wash st. 20

I think Vegas has this one right, not much value.
  
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 17
Posted: #25
    I like WSU a TON here!!!! Even more than I liked UCF-3.  For some reason WSU plays ranked teams better on the road, especially Stanford the past 4 years. We all know WSU sucks at stopping the run. Fortunately for them Stanford doesn't have a crazy good running back. They have a few good backs that can pound the run but a couple stops a quarter from WSU and they are right in this game.
     As for Halliday, he continues his ridiculous year. It's his senior year and he's gonna go out with a bang. If Golson can pass for 240/2 Hall should go 420/4 with the amount of talent in the WR corps. Stanford hasn't faced a QB of his caliber this year so don't be surprised if the games within 6 pts at half. I may even go as far as saying WSU may be up by 6 at half...tho that's far fetched.
     As for the Cal game... I think WSU got caught being cocky after the win @Utah and keeping it so close to Oregon. They should be off their high horse and back to reality. 
      That being said I'm calling for the upset. I just think Halliday is going to be too much for Stanford. Like I said before, they play Stanford better away and I see that streak continuing.
Call me CRAZY but...

WSU- 34
Stanford- 27

Over 53
Bol everyone.

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.