Following this only leads to "team experts" which is only a few people per game, not the top 10%. If the top 10% info is gone, then this a serious loss of information. I don't understand why the format was made this confusing. NOBODY here cares about team logos and bar graphs telling us that 4 is a greater number than 2. This site has been so awesome because so there was so much data quickly and easily accessed. That's ruined now - for apparently no logical reason at all.
Notice how you've been ignored by covers team here. They think top 10% is the same but it's not. They clearly have no intention to fix it or put it back to the way it was. This is horrible and I think covers is going to lose big time by not listening to their people on this. It's going to be sad to see covers disappear if this is the case.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BoomtownSports:
Following this only leads to "team experts" which is only a few people per game, not the top 10%. If the top 10% info is gone, then this a serious loss of information. I don't understand why the format was made this confusing. NOBODY here cares about team logos and bar graphs telling us that 4 is a greater number than 2. This site has been so awesome because so there was so much data quickly and easily accessed. That's ruined now - for apparently no logical reason at all.
Notice how you've been ignored by covers team here. They think top 10% is the same but it's not. They clearly have no intention to fix it or put it back to the way it was. This is horrible and I think covers is going to lose big time by not listening to their people on this. It's going to be sad to see covers disappear if this is the case.
Notice how you've been ignored by covers team here. They think top 10% is the same but it's not. They clearly have no intention to fix it or put it back to the way it was. This is horrible and I think covers is going to lose big time by not listening to their people on this. It's going to be sad to see covers disappear if this is the case.
The top 10% sorting option will be added in the near future.
- CT
Winning Starts Here
0
Quote Originally Posted by isport:
Notice how you've been ignored by covers team here. They think top 10% is the same but it's not. They clearly have no intention to fix it or put it back to the way it was. This is horrible and I think covers is going to lose big time by not listening to their people on this. It's going to be sad to see covers disappear if this is the case.
The top 10% sorting option will be added in the near future.
I'm sorry CT but I read your post (post #5) and don't agree that all of the information is there. Not being able to filter by date, not having game times, not having opponents makes it completely different. Additionally, I frequently clicked the link that allowed you to track the movement of lines that included dates and times of those moves. That appears to be gone as well. So I don't agree that it's the same data The former consensus format was the #1 reason I came to this site dozens of times a week. Seems like others agreed. It seems nearsighted to have drastically changed things. I understand wanting to make enhancements, but removing info and making it harder to access the data doesn't seem like an enhancement. If it doesn't get fixed quickly, I'm afraid I'll have to visit other sites for the info. Please fix it quickly. Thanks!
0
I'm sorry CT but I read your post (post #5) and don't agree that all of the information is there. Not being able to filter by date, not having game times, not having opponents makes it completely different. Additionally, I frequently clicked the link that allowed you to track the movement of lines that included dates and times of those moves. That appears to be gone as well. So I don't agree that it's the same data The former consensus format was the #1 reason I came to this site dozens of times a week. Seems like others agreed. It seems nearsighted to have drastically changed things. I understand wanting to make enhancements, but removing info and making it harder to access the data doesn't seem like an enhancement. If it doesn't get fixed quickly, I'm afraid I'll have to visit other sites for the info. Please fix it quickly. Thanks!
I'm sorry CT but I read your post (post #5) and don't agree that all of the information is there. Not being able to filter by date, not having game times, not having opponents makes it completely different. Additionally, I frequently clicked the link that allowed you to track the movement of lines that included dates and times of those moves. That appears to be gone as well. So I don't agree that it's the same data The former consensus format was the #1 reason I came to this site dozens of times a week. Seems like others agreed. It seems nearsighted to have drastically changed things. I understand wanting to make enhancements, but removing info and making it harder to access the data doesn't seem like an enhancement. If it doesn't get fixed quickly, I'm afraid I'll have to visit other sites for the info. Please fix it quickly. Thanks!
Thanks for the feedback. As mentioned, we are still in the process of adding features and importing some of the old data.
- CT
Winning Starts Here
0
Quote Originally Posted by jmreagles:
I'm sorry CT but I read your post (post #5) and don't agree that all of the information is there. Not being able to filter by date, not having game times, not having opponents makes it completely different. Additionally, I frequently clicked the link that allowed you to track the movement of lines that included dates and times of those moves. That appears to be gone as well. So I don't agree that it's the same data The former consensus format was the #1 reason I came to this site dozens of times a week. Seems like others agreed. It seems nearsighted to have drastically changed things. I understand wanting to make enhancements, but removing info and making it harder to access the data doesn't seem like an enhancement. If it doesn't get fixed quickly, I'm afraid I'll have to visit other sites for the info. Please fix it quickly. Thanks!
Thanks for the feedback. As mentioned, we are still in the process of adding features and importing some of the old data.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.