how many teams in the league tundra....WR is very thin for you to say the least...dont like your running back situation either...i have a feeling that hillis will not live up to expectations this year...you may want to trade kolb for an upgrade at the wideout spot or package kolb and hillis (or starks) for another very strong running back to go with mendenhall.
0
how many teams in the league tundra....WR is very thin for you to say the least...dont like your running back situation either...i have a feeling that hillis will not live up to expectations this year...you may want to trade kolb for an upgrade at the wideout spot or package kolb and hillis (or starks) for another very strong running back to go with mendenhall.
12 Teams. I agree about Hillis. I only have to start 1RB and will use Hillis sparingly. I agree I need an upgrade on WR, but it was a keeper league which I adopted and started out with Vick/Mendenhall/Holmes (slim pickings).
0
12 Teams. I agree about Hillis. I only have to start 1RB and will use Hillis sparingly. I agree I need an upgrade on WR, but it was a keeper league which I adopted and started out with Vick/Mendenhall/Holmes (slim pickings).
I'd be a little worried about that RB situation as well. I like Mendy for sure in standard formats but wouldn't be thrilled if he was my top back in a PPR. I'm a little down on Hillis but if he comes anywhere near last years reception total then he's a RB1 for you. Starks probably isn't startable for you right now, but he's a good keeper option for the future.
Holmes and Manningham are both underrated on my boards. Not sure I love either quite as much in a PPR but both could be top 15 WRs. No issues at all with Harvin. 80 receptions is realistic for him.
High on Pettigrew in PPRs. Actually, high on almost all Lions players in all formats.
0
I'd be a little worried about that RB situation as well. I like Mendy for sure in standard formats but wouldn't be thrilled if he was my top back in a PPR. I'm a little down on Hillis but if he comes anywhere near last years reception total then he's a RB1 for you. Starks probably isn't startable for you right now, but he's a good keeper option for the future.
Holmes and Manningham are both underrated on my boards. Not sure I love either quite as much in a PPR but both could be top 15 WRs. No issues at all with Harvin. 80 receptions is realistic for him.
High on Pettigrew in PPRs. Actually, high on almost all Lions players in all formats.
I would look into packaging Winslow and either Manningham/Holmes/Harvin(one of these three) and upgrading at RB(use blustuarts top 25 RB list as a guide).
There really is no sense in carring two TE's in this league. You don't have to do this but find out if anyone has, and plans on playing, Eli Manning and try and sell them Manningham and the TE. They may not bite on it but it is a selling point. Because at this point you are a salesman. You have to find a reason for them to want your players to get that RB.
Don't be scared to include Hillis in a package as well. Package Hillis and one of the receivers if need be. But I do think you need to upgrade at QB.
0
I would look into packaging Winslow and either Manningham/Holmes/Harvin(one of these three) and upgrading at RB(use blustuarts top 25 RB list as a guide).
There really is no sense in carring two TE's in this league. You don't have to do this but find out if anyone has, and plans on playing, Eli Manning and try and sell them Manningham and the TE. They may not bite on it but it is a selling point. Because at this point you are a salesman. You have to find a reason for them to want your players to get that RB.
Don't be scared to include Hillis in a package as well. Package Hillis and one of the receivers if need be. But I do think you need to upgrade at QB.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.