Solid except for your WR, Bowe & Garcon are solid, but concerns on both. I don't like Santana Moss at all.
Im not a fan of his either but for a 3rd fantasy WR i think he'll do just fine, L3 seasons he had 1000, 900 and 1100+ and scored 15 td's for an AVG of 950 yrds and 6 scores..
Bowe should have 1200+ and 7-11 td's..
i think i got 3 wr's in the top 25 and 3 rb's in the top 20 plus a top 10 QB in schaub..
0
Quote Originally Posted by FrozenTundra:
Solid except for your WR, Bowe & Garcon are solid, but concerns on both. I don't like Santana Moss at all.
Im not a fan of his either but for a 3rd fantasy WR i think he'll do just fine, L3 seasons he had 1000, 900 and 1100+ and scored 15 td's for an AVG of 950 yrds and 6 scores..
Bowe should have 1200+ and 7-11 td's..
i think i got 3 wr's in the top 25 and 3 rb's in the top 20 plus a top 10 QB in schaub..
u guys that put Rd's on when guys should and shouldnt be taken are retarded, its the same as the guys that say "dont take a QB in Rd 1. we only had 16 Rd's and i had all my starters locked up so i took a top 5 defense and a solid Kicker..
and yes "the Law Firm" is a top 20 RB, he has a nose for the endzone and hasnt fumbled as a Pro and the pats will feed him the ball inside the redzone and another 800-900 yard yr with 7, 8 or 9 TD's is a given... thats fine with me for my 3rd RB.
you guys must be fantasy wizards right i mean come on now u got Kenny as an avatar and your chucking stones bro'..
i guess i should've waited and took buffalo's Defense in the 16th Rd, that wouldve nade my team much better...
0
u guys that put Rd's on when guys should and shouldnt be taken are retarded, its the same as the guys that say "dont take a QB in Rd 1. we only had 16 Rd's and i had all my starters locked up so i took a top 5 defense and a solid Kicker..
and yes "the Law Firm" is a top 20 RB, he has a nose for the endzone and hasnt fumbled as a Pro and the pats will feed him the ball inside the redzone and another 800-900 yard yr with 7, 8 or 9 TD's is a given... thats fine with me for my 3rd RB.
you guys must be fantasy wizards right i mean come on now u got Kenny as an avatar and your chucking stones bro'..
i guess i should've waited and took buffalo's Defense in the 16th Rd, that wouldve nade my team much better...
when he came to me at 7 i hesitated for a minute but couldnt pass on him but it was a gamble cause of the holdout.. i was surprised he dropped but i guess no-one wanted to chance him holding out and not being ready to start wk 1.
0
when he came to me at 7 i hesitated for a minute but couldnt pass on him but it was a gamble cause of the holdout.. i was surprised he dropped but i guess no-one wanted to chance him holding out and not being ready to start wk 1.
u guys that put Rd's on when guys should and shouldnt be taken are retarded, its the same as the guys that say "dont take a QB in Rd 1. we only had 16 Rd's and i had all my starters locked up so i took a top 5 defense and a solid Kicker..
and yes "the Law Firm" is a top 20 RB, he has a nose for the endzone and hasnt fumbled as a Pro and the pats will feed him the ball inside the redzone and another 800-900 yard yr with 7, 8 or 9 TD's is a given... thats fine with me for my 3rd RB.
you guys must be fantasy wizards right i mean come on now u got Kenny as an avatar and your chucking stones bro'..
i guess i should've waited and took buffalo's Defense in the 16th Rd, that wouldve nade my team much better...
I am by no means a fantasy expert and not trying to "chuck stones"... you asked for opinions and I gave you mine. I don't have a problem with your team (other than those two picks). Didn't mention anything about BJGE but for your 3rd RB I would be happy with that also especially with 14 teams.
In my opinion, your 9th and 10th picks (even your 8th) could've added to that depth that you already created with your earlier picks is what I'm saying and that's the strategy I would've continued and waited for those others until later.
For instance, (going off of ESPN rankings) Matt Bryant is the 13th ranked K and with only 14 teams in the league no reason you need to take him in the 10th round.
Chicago is ranked 6th and after seeing a lot of other teams took DEF early I can now see why you would grab them (personally I would just wait but understand after seeing how it was going). Last year they scored 150 points in there 16 games. The 14th ranked DEF (Oakland) scored 142 points (based off ESPN scoring). That is why I wait for DEF and K... not as big of a drop off compared to RB and WR.
Once again, not trying to bash you or say your team sucks but just giving my opinion as you asked.
GL to your team this year!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by --phillyfan--:
u guys that put Rd's on when guys should and shouldnt be taken are retarded, its the same as the guys that say "dont take a QB in Rd 1. we only had 16 Rd's and i had all my starters locked up so i took a top 5 defense and a solid Kicker..
and yes "the Law Firm" is a top 20 RB, he has a nose for the endzone and hasnt fumbled as a Pro and the pats will feed him the ball inside the redzone and another 800-900 yard yr with 7, 8 or 9 TD's is a given... thats fine with me for my 3rd RB.
you guys must be fantasy wizards right i mean come on now u got Kenny as an avatar and your chucking stones bro'..
i guess i should've waited and took buffalo's Defense in the 16th Rd, that wouldve nade my team much better...
I am by no means a fantasy expert and not trying to "chuck stones"... you asked for opinions and I gave you mine. I don't have a problem with your team (other than those two picks). Didn't mention anything about BJGE but for your 3rd RB I would be happy with that also especially with 14 teams.
In my opinion, your 9th and 10th picks (even your 8th) could've added to that depth that you already created with your earlier picks is what I'm saying and that's the strategy I would've continued and waited for those others until later.
For instance, (going off of ESPN rankings) Matt Bryant is the 13th ranked K and with only 14 teams in the league no reason you need to take him in the 10th round.
Chicago is ranked 6th and after seeing a lot of other teams took DEF early I can now see why you would grab them (personally I would just wait but understand after seeing how it was going). Last year they scored 150 points in there 16 games. The 14th ranked DEF (Oakland) scored 142 points (based off ESPN scoring). That is why I wait for DEF and K... not as big of a drop off compared to RB and WR.
Once again, not trying to bash you or say your team sucks but just giving my opinion as you asked.
its cool JW.. i see your view of it though.. after u break it down and look at it like that it makes sense and your right, i couldve added a few other BN guys and grabbed a K later but from my view Bryant isnt that high up, i had him ranked 5th in K's and thats cause he's consistent and ranked 4th last yr in scoring and accuracy.. thanks for the post JW.. im still learning and havent been doing fantasy that long so always appreciate outside views..
0
its cool JW.. i see your view of it though.. after u break it down and look at it like that it makes sense and your right, i couldve added a few other BN guys and grabbed a K later but from my view Bryant isnt that high up, i had him ranked 5th in K's and thats cause he's consistent and ranked 4th last yr in scoring and accuracy.. thanks for the post JW.. im still learning and havent been doing fantasy that long so always appreciate outside views..
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
i mean come on now u got Kenny as an avatar and your chucking stones bro'.. 
Hot Forum Topics
