HAD THESE GRADED AS LOSSES, I KNOW ONLY A SMALL AMOUNT BUT BASED ON THE LINES I ASSUMED IT WAS FOR THE SERIES, THEYRE TRYING TO TELL ME IT WAS FOR TONIGHTS GAME ONLY LOL.... LIKE ALL THESE GUYS ARE SCORING THAT MANY POINTS IN A GAME
246734394-1
6/4/14 5:59pm
$25.00
$30.00
$0.00
Loss
6/4/14 8:00pm Props Hockey 4153 R.Nash goals+assists over 4 +120*vs R.Nash goals+assists under 4
246734394-2
6/4/14 5:59pm
$25.00
$32.50
$0.00
Loss
6/4/14 8:00pm Props Hockey 4161 B.Richards goals+assists over 3½ +130*vs B.Richards goals+assists under 3½
246734394-3
6/4/14 5:59pm
$25.00
$36.25
$0.00
Loss
6/4/14 8:00pm Props Hockey 4175 M.Richards goals+assists over 3 +145*vs M.Richards goals+assists under 3
not a savior
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
HAD THESE GRADED AS LOSSES, I KNOW ONLY A SMALL AMOUNT BUT BASED ON THE LINES I ASSUMED IT WAS FOR THE SERIES, THEYRE TRYING TO TELL ME IT WAS FOR TONIGHTS GAME ONLY LOL.... LIKE ALL THESE GUYS ARE SCORING THAT MANY POINTS IN A GAME
246734394-1
6/4/14 5:59pm
$25.00
$30.00
$0.00
Loss
6/4/14 8:00pm Props Hockey 4153 R.Nash goals+assists over 4 +120*vs R.Nash goals+assists under 4
246734394-2
6/4/14 5:59pm
$25.00
$32.50
$0.00
Loss
6/4/14 8:00pm Props Hockey 4161 B.Richards goals+assists over 3½ +130*vs B.Richards goals+assists under 3½
246734394-3
6/4/14 5:59pm
$25.00
$36.25
$0.00
Loss
6/4/14 8:00pm Props Hockey 4175 M.Richards goals+assists over 3 +145*vs M.Richards goals+assists under 3
telling me they were for only game one with these over unders of 3-4 points per player. whata scam theyre taking my money and running. guy told me to talk to tony, like that's gonna help me.
not a savior
0
telling me they were for only game one with these over unders of 3-4 points per player. whata scam theyre taking my money and running. guy told me to talk to tony, like that's gonna help me.
Talk to them in the morning, ask for Tony. They should clear it up for you, their late night support is hit or miss
thanks man, ive only heard bad things about tony but hopefully he helps. I tried telling the guy no way these totals are for one game and he didn't wanna hear about it
not a savior
0
Quote Originally Posted by eritas:
Talk to them in the morning, ask for Tony. They should clear it up for you, their late night support is hit or miss
thanks man, ive only heard bad things about tony but hopefully he helps. I tried telling the guy no way these totals are for one game and he didn't wanna hear about it
you assumed wrong............read closely BEFORE you place a bet. Those are obviously all single game props.........you screwed up plain and simple.
totally your fault
welcome to the world of on line sports betting
buddy even if I did screw up oh well. but look at that line and tell me it makes sense for a single game at those odds. it makes zero sense so don't come in here all high and mighty thinkin u know it all
not a savior
0
Quote Originally Posted by Alien-1:
you assumed wrong............read closely BEFORE you place a bet. Those are obviously all single game props.........you screwed up plain and simple.
totally your fault
welcome to the world of on line sports betting
buddy even if I did screw up oh well. but look at that line and tell me it makes sense for a single game at those odds. it makes zero sense so don't come in here all high and mighty thinkin u know it all
i posted a thread earlier about this exact situation thinking it was screwy but nobody responded.....i figured it was for the series but didn't bet it bc they didn't have any headlines or titles saying for the series. and i didn't want to take advantage for a bad line either "tony" wouldn't be too happy about that
0
i posted a thread earlier about this exact situation thinking it was screwy but nobody responded.....i figured it was for the series but didn't bet it bc they didn't have any headlines or titles saying for the series. and i didn't want to take advantage for a bad line either "tony" wouldn't be too happy about that
buddy even if I did screw up oh well. but look at that line and tell me it makes sense for a single game at those odds. it makes zero sense so don't come in here all high and mighty thinkin u know it all
Just so you know......youre speaking to a professional gambler here son.......here is some free insight:
For example:....If you think ANY book is gonna pay out +145 on M. Richards if he scores over 3 total(goals +assists) for a potential 7 game series, you my friend, are EXTREMELY inexperienced and have very little knowledge of gambling.
All of those props were for a single game, It's obvious !!
Welcome to the gambling school of hard knocks
You ignorance has cost you money and ya know what........I'm 100% positive it won't be the last time you're inexperience will cost you money !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by rlovsin17:
buddy even if I did screw up oh well. but look at that line and tell me it makes sense for a single game at those odds. it makes zero sense so don't come in here all high and mighty thinkin u know it all
Just so you know......youre speaking to a professional gambler here son.......here is some free insight:
For example:....If you think ANY book is gonna pay out +145 on M. Richards if he scores over 3 total(goals +assists) for a potential 7 game series, you my friend, are EXTREMELY inexperienced and have very little knowledge of gambling.
All of those props were for a single game, It's obvious !!
Welcome to the gambling school of hard knocks
You ignorance has cost you money and ya know what........I'm 100% positive it won't be the last time you're inexperience will cost you money !!
Just so you know......youre speaking to a professional gambler here son.......here is some free insight:
For example:....If you think ANY book is gonna pay out +145 on M. Richards if he scores over 3 total(goals +assists) for a potential 7 game series, you my friend, are EXTREMELY inexperienced and have very little knowledge of gambling.
All of those props were for a single game, It's obvious !!
Welcome to the gambling school of hard knocks
You ignorance has cost you money and ya know what........I'm 100% positive it won't be the last time you're inexperience will cost you money !!
yea so a game lined at over 5 has props for every player to score 3 or 4 pts over or under, tell me how that makes sense. if the predicted outcome the book had for the whole game was lined at 5 even
not a savior
0
Quote Originally Posted by Alien-1:
Just so you know......youre speaking to a professional gambler here son.......here is some free insight:
For example:....If you think ANY book is gonna pay out +145 on M. Richards if he scores over 3 total(goals +assists) for a potential 7 game series, you my friend, are EXTREMELY inexperienced and have very little knowledge of gambling.
All of those props were for a single game, It's obvious !!
Welcome to the gambling school of hard knocks
You ignorance has cost you money and ya know what........I'm 100% positive it won't be the last time you're inexperience will cost you money !!
yea so a game lined at over 5 has props for every player to score 3 or 4 pts over or under, tell me how that makes sense. if the predicted outcome the book had for the whole game was lined at 5 even
rlovsin17 your 100 percent right about getting a real bad line on these bets just unreal .betting nash over 4 goals+assists +120 but I would bet that there limit on something like that would be 100 if not this sport book would go 100 broke giving a bad line like that. but yeah you make a mistake this was for 1 game only
Dilaudid8
0
rlovsin17 your 100 percent right about getting a real bad line on these bets just unreal .betting nash over 4 goals+assists +120 but I would bet that there limit on something like that would be 100 if not this sport book would go 100 broke giving a bad line like that. but yeah you make a mistake this was for 1 game only
Just so you know......youre speaking to a professional gambler here son.......here is some free insight:
For example:....If you think ANY book is gonna pay out +145 on M. Richards if he scores over 3 total(goals +assists) for a potential 7 game series, you my friend, are EXTREMELY inexperienced and have very little knowledge of gambling.
All of those props were for a single game, It's obvious !!
Welcome to the gambling school of hard knocks
You ignorance has cost you money and ya know what........I'm 100% positive it won't be the last time you're inexperience will cost you money !!
Alien, what the hell are you talking about? You think they offer 3.5-4 pt props for a single game when the Rangers tt was 2.5 juiced way down?
Lol you might wanna take a step back and realize there is some ignorance here, and it's coming from you. Richards and Nash have both averaged about 0.5 pts per game so if you factor that into a 7 game series (with 7 obviously being the max) then 3.5/4 do make absolute perfect sense.
These bets are CLEARLY for game 1. Next time you speak in certainties, you better be 100% sure you know what you are talking about. You have a pretty good nba forum reputation, better off keeping it there. You are 100% dead wrong here.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Alien-1:
Just so you know......youre speaking to a professional gambler here son.......here is some free insight:
For example:....If you think ANY book is gonna pay out +145 on M. Richards if he scores over 3 total(goals +assists) for a potential 7 game series, you my friend, are EXTREMELY inexperienced and have very little knowledge of gambling.
All of those props were for a single game, It's obvious !!
Welcome to the gambling school of hard knocks
You ignorance has cost you money and ya know what........I'm 100% positive it won't be the last time you're inexperience will cost you money !!
Alien, what the hell are you talking about? You think they offer 3.5-4 pt props for a single game when the Rangers tt was 2.5 juiced way down?
Lol you might wanna take a step back and realize there is some ignorance here, and it's coming from you. Richards and Nash have both averaged about 0.5 pts per game so if you factor that into a 7 game series (with 7 obviously being the max) then 3.5/4 do make absolute perfect sense.
These bets are CLEARLY for game 1. Next time you speak in certainties, you better be 100% sure you know what you are talking about. You have a pretty good nba forum reputation, better off keeping it there. You are 100% dead wrong here.
I cannot believe all the people falsly chiming in thinking these were really game 1 bets.
Yea, because you wouldn't put the house on under 3.5/4 pts in a single game when the leading playoff scorers average 1 pt per game. (Kopitar leads the entire playoffs with 24 pts in 22 games)
All of you guys realize how insanely retarded you sound? And to be so sure of your false beliefs without even realizing to check the numbers on what actually does and doesn't make sense.
0
I cannot believe all the people falsly chiming in thinking these were really game 1 bets.
Yea, because you wouldn't put the house on under 3.5/4 pts in a single game when the leading playoff scorers average 1 pt per game. (Kopitar leads the entire playoffs with 24 pts in 22 games)
All of you guys realize how insanely retarded you sound? And to be so sure of your false beliefs without even realizing to check the numbers on what actually does and doesn't make sense.
Just so you know......youre speaking to a professional gambler here son.......here is some free insight:
For example:....If you think ANY book is gonna pay out +145 on M. Richards if he scores over 3 total(goals +assists) for a potential 7 game series, you my friend, are EXTREMELY inexperienced and have very little knowledge of gambling.
All of those props were for a single game, It's obvious !!
Welcome to the gambling school of hard knocks
You ignorance has cost you money and ya know what........I'm 100% positive it won't be the last time you're inexperience will cost you money !!
Hmm lets see, professional gambler. So am I, and I could sound smarter in a cricket forum. (a sport I know nothing about, simply by checking the numbers) than you sound in this thread, in this forum.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Alien-1:
Just so you know......youre speaking to a professional gambler here son.......here is some free insight:
For example:....If you think ANY book is gonna pay out +145 on M. Richards if he scores over 3 total(goals +assists) for a potential 7 game series, you my friend, are EXTREMELY inexperienced and have very little knowledge of gambling.
All of those props were for a single game, It's obvious !!
Welcome to the gambling school of hard knocks
You ignorance has cost you money and ya know what........I'm 100% positive it won't be the last time you're inexperience will cost you money !!
Hmm lets see, professional gambler. So am I, and I could sound smarter in a cricket forum. (a sport I know nothing about, simply by checking the numbers) than you sound in this thread, in this forum.
buddy even if I did screw up oh well. but look at that line and tell me it makes sense for a single game at those odds. it makes zero sense so don't come in here all high and mighty thinkin u know it all
I was just wondering if you wanted to go under how much money would this sports book let you bet. if the over was +120 the under would to be -140 or something close
Dilaudid8
0
Quote Originally Posted by rlovsin17:
buddy even if I did screw up oh well. but look at that line and tell me it makes sense for a single game at those odds. it makes zero sense so don't come in here all high and mighty thinkin u know it all
I was just wondering if you wanted to go under how much money would this sports book let you bet. if the over was +120 the under would to be -140 or something close
I cannot believe all the people falsly chiming in thinking these were really game 1 bets.
Yea, because you wouldn't put the house on under 3.5/4 pts in a single game when the leading playoff scorers average 1 pt per game. (Kopitar leads the entire playoffs with 24 pts in 22 games)
All of you guys realize how insanely retarded you sound? And to be so sure of your false beliefs without even realizing to check the numbers on what actually does and doesn't make sense.
not a savior
0
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
I cannot believe all the people falsly chiming in thinking these were really game 1 bets.
Yea, because you wouldn't put the house on under 3.5/4 pts in a single game when the leading playoff scorers average 1 pt per game. (Kopitar leads the entire playoffs with 24 pts in 22 games)
All of you guys realize how insanely retarded you sound? And to be so sure of your false beliefs without even realizing to check the numbers on what actually does and doesn't make sense.
If those were single game prop bet options for game 1, I literally may have taken a 2nd mortgage out on my house and played the under lol
Lol but remember, Alien is a "professional" who is supposed to be able to spot value. He wasn't a huge fan of under 4 pts for a single player in a game. If you ask Alien, it was a coin flip.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wheaty :
If those were single game prop bet options for game 1, I literally may have taken a 2nd mortgage out on my house and played the under lol
Lol but remember, Alien is a "professional" who is supposed to be able to spot value. He wasn't a huge fan of under 4 pts for a single player in a game. If you ask Alien, it was a coin flip.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.