All Forums | General Discussion

9-11 was an inside job.

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 24872
Posts: 599
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 484
Posted: #351
make that "truther" not birther...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 484
Posted: #352
the "birthers" actually have a legitimate case...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #353
wmi = weapons of mass ignorance
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #354
Quote Originally Posted by sowhat83:



Well, then who should investigate?

Please....get a job and leave the conspiracy unraveling to the smart people....you're nothing but a sheep being led to slaughter...you and the rest of your "truther" buffoons...lmao...

One last thought, genius, if is so evident that these buildings were the victims of a controlled demolition, then why did the insurance companies pay out billions, rather than bring this subject up?


I had my car broken into recently, and my insurance company wouldn't replace my $300 digital camera without me sending them receipts and police reports, but apparently multi-billion dollar insurance fraud can be carried out without anyone asking questions.

Unbelievable.

You're one of the worst donkeys here. Congrats reject.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #355
sowhat83 just took the lead as biggest fucking idiot

he thinks building 7 turned to dust because it was hit by debris

fucking retard

u are sad
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #356
Im not gonna keep debating with a monkey.

Go climb a tree.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #357
Even if you were right, there was molten metal found at the bottom of all three buildings.

The fact that I have to repeat myself and that you dont even understand what that means speaks volumes.

But hey, keep sitting their claiming you know stuff.

Your remarkably primitive existence shocks us.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33035
Posted: #358
LOL! 462 post and only Elvis and the Easter Bunny agree with Dog
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 2952
Posted: #359
Off topic a bit, but why do all the conspiracy theorists I know have low intelligence, very few relationships and continually flit between low paid jobs, if indeed they can hold one at all? Just wondered.

It's funny because the ones I know all seem to have the same agenda: Gay Marriage, Occupy and 9/11, almost as if it's some kind of manifesto and movement they belong to, instead of an opinion borne of neutrality, common sense and solid, provable evidence.

The other thing they have in common is they all have a hard luck story to go along with their theories, the undiagnosable Bi-Polar Disorder being the medical condition of choice, but not limited to that. It can be sexual abuse, violent Father or a combination of the three, but generally there will a 'hard-luck-story' just dying to get out.

I think my point is, I've noticed the demographic that seems to thrive on 'conspiracy theories,' and I feel safer precisely because it is that demographic.

If it was people of intelligence I'd be concerned.

Carry on.


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 1560
Posted: #360
Quote Originally Posted by dogunder:

Ive known it for years.

Overwhelming evidence to support this. If you arent with me on this you are either really stupid or have not done enough research, or both...

I will show you all the evidence that you will need in this thread.

You can start with this video.


interesting im really into history and the tradegy of 911 gonna watch the video now 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 227
Posted: #361
Quote Originally Posted by sowhat83:

the "birthers" actually have a legitimate case...

You are a fucking idiot.

Your theory is that the US government couldn't determine the birthplace of its president, but can confirm that Tower 7 wasn't brought down by controlled demolition.

And you're running your hole, or both holes, about DogUnder?

You know, laddie, I'm thinking of making you a PaddyMac Special Case. You need the E-quivalent of a red hot poker rammed up your cornhole.

I'm off to be now, but let's consider it again over the weekend.

In fact, let's let the forum decide. Who would like to see SoWhat83's head flushed a few times in the toilet, and who sees him as a leading intellectual light.

It probably wasn't too bright to incorporate your IQ into your user name, though.

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 227
Posted: #362
Quote Originally Posted by halofan:

Off topic a bit, but why do all the conspiracy theorists I know have low intelligence, very few relationships and continually flit between low paid jobs, if indeed they can hold one at all? Just wondered.

It's funny because the ones I know all seem to have the same agenda: Gay Marriage, Occupy and 9/11, almost as if it's some kind of manifesto and movement they belong to, instead of an opinion borne of neutrality, common sense and solid, provable evidence.

The other thing they have in common is they all have a hard luck story to go along with their theories, the undiagnosable Bi-Polar Disorder being the medical condition of choice, but not limited to that. It can be sexual abuse, violent Father or a combination of the three, but generally there will a 'hard-luck-story' just dying to get out.

I think my point is, I've noticed the demographic that seems to thrive on 'conspiracy theories,' and I feel safer precisely because it is that demographic.

If it was people of intelligence I'd be concerned.

Carry on.



Who planted you in this forum, you simple minded twat?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 3158
Posted: #363
Quote Originally Posted by PaddyMacR:


You are a fucking idiot.

Your theory is that the US government couldn't determine the birthplace of its president, but can confirm that Tower 7 wasn't brought down by controlled demolition.

And you're running your hole, or both holes, about DogUnder?

You know, laddie, I'm thinking of making you a PaddyMac Special Case. You need the E-quivalent of a red hot poker rammed up your cornhole.

I'm off to be now, but let's consider it again over the weekend.

In fact, let's let the forum decide. Who would like to see SoWhat83's head flushed a few times in the toilet, and who sees him as a leading intellectual light.

It probably wasn't too bright to incorporate your IQ into your user name, though.

 


Didn't djbrow respectfully asked you to "Please calm down on the language in the names. "?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 36999
Posted: #364
Quote Originally Posted by halofan:

Off topic a bit, but why do all the conspiracy theorists I know have low intelligence, very few relationships and continually flit between low paid jobs, if indeed they can hold one at all? Just wondered.

It's funny because the ones I know all seem to have the same agenda: Gay Marriage, Occupy and 9/11, almost as if it's some kind of manifesto and movement they belong to, instead of an opinion borne of neutrality, common sense and solid, provable evidence.

The other thing they have in common is they all have a hard luck story to go along with their theories, the undiagnosable Bi-Polar Disorder being the medical condition of choice, but not limited to that. It can be sexual abuse, violent Father or a combination of the three, but generally there will a 'hard-luck-story' just dying to get out.

I think my point is, I've noticed the demographic that seems to thrive on 'conspiracy theories,' and I feel safer precisely because it is that demographic.

If it was people of intelligence I'd be concerned.

Carry on.



 I guess it makes them feel important, like they know something no one else does. It's kind of sad to watch someone with this affliction argue about something they really know nothing about til they're blue in the face.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 227
Posted: #365
Quote Originally Posted by Randisist:



Didn't djbrow respectfully asked you to "Please calm down on the language in the names. "?

It is quite calm, given what it is the subjects are trying to do.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 30137
Posted: #366
Damn, im sure that was the tooth fairy.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 2952
Posted: #367
Quote Originally Posted by PaddyMacR:


Who planted you in this forum, you simple minded twat?


Michael Stone and Stevie 'Top-Gun' McKeag. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 2952
Posted: #368
Quote Originally Posted by PaddyMacR:


Who planted you in this forum, you simple minded twat?


Love the way you seem to think your asinine arguments can somehow be enhanced if you call people f'kin idiotys and twats.

And this coming for a thicko Taig?

Priceless.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #369
Melting point of steel is 2750 degrees fahrenheit
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #370
The maximum temperature that jet fuel will burn at is around 800-1200 degrees fahrenheit
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #371
Evidence of molten metal found under all 3 buildings, one of which was not even hit by a plane

For those of you who arent the sharpest tools of the shed, molten metal means the melted steel from the building.


This is scientific proof that explosives were used to bring down the buildings, as if it wasnt obvious already from the evidence.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #372
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 3494
Posted: #373
To those of you who will say it wasn't necessary for the steel to melt for the towers to collapse, you are wrong.

1) They fell at free spall speed and collapsed into dust

2) Many other, older less powerful buildings burnt a lot hotter and a lot longer and remain standing to this day.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 227
Posted: #374
Quote Originally Posted by halofan:



Love the way you seem to think your asinine arguments can somehow be enhanced if you call people f'kin idiotys and twats.

 

Well, it provides a starting point. My argument is that Tower 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition. It's up to where you go from there. But there is no doubt Tower 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition.

Which, you thick bollox, would have to have been in the building prior to the attack. 

So I hope that is of assistance to you. You must be a relative of Lenny Murphy. Sad about Lenny, no?


 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 33959
Posted: #375
Quote Originally Posted by dogunder:

 people who believe the governments explanation

4 arabs with boxcutters take over hijacked airliners and pull off unprecedented manuever unmolested by any military aircraft

Theres no footage of a plane hitting the pentagon, only a missile

explosives were clearly used to bring down the buildings, the molten metal, testimony of eyewitnesses, etc

I could go on for hours

Its really pathetic how ignorant people are

"why would the government do this to us"??? they ask

to gain support for war, money... those are the main 2 

any more questions?

They passed The Patriot Act " after 911...

All Forums | General Discussion
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.