But although the ratio is shifting, Obama still intends to spend the bulk of U.S. drug war money on efforts to block producers and dealers. His plan to spend a total of $14.4 billion attacking the supply side is $2.5 billion more than would be spent on the demand side.
The $25 billion in funding is spread across at least 10 different agencies, with the bulk of it going to the Health and Human Services Department ($8.7 billion), Justice Department ($7.8 billion) and Homeland Security Department ($4.1 billion).
Meanwhile, direct spending on the war on drugs continues to climb. In 2010, when Obama launched his new anti-drug approach, the country spent $24.6 billion on anti-drug programs. If Obama gets his way, in 2015 it will spend that—plus $740 million more.
But although the ratio is shifting, Obama still intends to spend the bulk of U.S. drug war money on efforts to block producers and dealers. His plan to spend a total of $14.4 billion attacking the supply side is $2.5 billion more than would be spent on the demand side.
The $25 billion in funding is spread across at least 10 different agencies, with the bulk of it going to the Health and Human Services Department ($8.7 billion), Justice Department ($7.8 billion) and Homeland Security Department ($4.1 billion).
Meanwhile, direct spending on the war on drugs continues to climb. In 2010, when Obama launched his new anti-drug approach, the country spent $24.6 billion on anti-drug programs. If Obama gets his way, in 2015 it will spend that—plus $740 million more.
But although the ratio is shifting, Obama still intends to spend the bulk of U.S. drug war money on efforts to block producers and dealers. His plan to spend a total of $14.4 billion attacking the supply side is $2.5 billion more than would be spent on the demand side.
The $25 billion in funding is spread across at least 10 different agencies, with the bulk of it going to the Health and Human Services Department ($8.7 billion), Justice Department ($7.8 billion) and Homeland Security Department ($4.1 billion).
Meanwhile, direct spending on the war on drugs continues to climb. In 2010, when Obama launched his new anti-drug approach, the country spent $24.6 billion on anti-drug programs. If Obama gets his way, in 2015 it will spend that—plus $740 million more.
But although the ratio is shifting, Obama still intends to spend the bulk of U.S. drug war money on efforts to block producers and dealers. His plan to spend a total of $14.4 billion attacking the supply side is $2.5 billion more than would be spent on the demand side.
The $25 billion in funding is spread across at least 10 different agencies, with the bulk of it going to the Health and Human Services Department ($8.7 billion), Justice Department ($7.8 billion) and Homeland Security Department ($4.1 billion).
Meanwhile, direct spending on the war on drugs continues to climb. In 2010, when Obama launched his new anti-drug approach, the country spent $24.6 billion on anti-drug programs. If Obama gets his way, in 2015 it will spend that—plus $740 million more.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-el-chapo-jailbreak-mexico-20150717-story.html
Here it comes today. Seven people arrested either guards or jail employees they did not specify helping him escape. You knew it was coming. More government workers. If they aren't going to enforce the laws why don't they just legalize it. We might as well just let everyone do what they want.
It's funny to me though you guys say drug charges are non violent stuff. That new york guy killed a sheriff that's violence. The guy that got off on cocaine charges killed a cop Omaha.
It reminds me of stuff like this. https://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2013/09/feds-slain-dallas-man-had-900000-stashed-in-safes-28-million-in-narcotics-sales-recorded-on-detailed-ledgers.html/
A guy selling drugs gets shot and killed by a guy that watches people working for drug cartels and robs them. So what happens to the guy that robbed him someone shot and killed him to. Drugs are insanely dumb. All they lead to is robberies, murders, and corruption.
You don't see someone say well that guy robbed that house because he drank a pepsi. Or that guy robbed that church because he just smoked a pall mall, or because he just robbed a 7/11 because he was up on orange juice. Drugs lead to violence.
You don't see little Timmy go rob a burger king employee because he has 900,000 dollars of cash in a safe at his home. If they aren't going to enforce the laws then I just say legalize it because what they have going now is honestly a joke. Karma will catch you sooner or later whether it's now or 20 years down the road.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-el-chapo-jailbreak-mexico-20150717-story.html
Here it comes today. Seven people arrested either guards or jail employees they did not specify helping him escape. You knew it was coming. More government workers. If they aren't going to enforce the laws why don't they just legalize it. We might as well just let everyone do what they want.
It's funny to me though you guys say drug charges are non violent stuff. That new york guy killed a sheriff that's violence. The guy that got off on cocaine charges killed a cop Omaha.
It reminds me of stuff like this. https://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2013/09/feds-slain-dallas-man-had-900000-stashed-in-safes-28-million-in-narcotics-sales-recorded-on-detailed-ledgers.html/
A guy selling drugs gets shot and killed by a guy that watches people working for drug cartels and robs them. So what happens to the guy that robbed him someone shot and killed him to. Drugs are insanely dumb. All they lead to is robberies, murders, and corruption.
You don't see someone say well that guy robbed that house because he drank a pepsi. Or that guy robbed that church because he just smoked a pall mall, or because he just robbed a 7/11 because he was up on orange juice. Drugs lead to violence.
You don't see little Timmy go rob a burger king employee because he has 900,000 dollars of cash in a safe at his home. If they aren't going to enforce the laws then I just say legalize it because what they have going now is honestly a joke. Karma will catch you sooner or later whether it's now or 20 years down the road.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.