Wrong.
The total payout is 4.55 billion.. which covers all costs.
Wrong.
The total payout is 4.55 billion.. which covers all costs.
Wrong.
The total payout is 4.55 billion.. which covers all costs.
Hutch, I'm not sure what sources you have that stated he ORIGINALLY had an insurance policy for under 4.55 million.
I have sources that state he had originally over 7 billion in insurance. https://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=larry_silverstein
I didn't catch the error regarding the flights Hutch... but is that really all you have? If I completely agreed with your argument there will still be dozens of holes in the official story. Do you have any proof the official is correct aside from the media telling you it is?
Hutch, I'm not sure what sources you have that stated he ORIGINALLY had an insurance policy for under 4.55 million.
I have sources that state he had originally over 7 billion in insurance. https://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=larry_silverstein
I didn't catch the error regarding the flights Hutch... but is that really all you have? If I completely agreed with your argument there will still be dozens of holes in the official story. Do you have any proof the official is correct aside from the media telling you it is?
He was operating under the idea it was 7 billion. He thought he was getting 7 billion when he signed up for this policy. You think he got lucky becuase they considered it one event, but I'm sure he feels screwed.
He was operating under the idea it was 7 billion. He thought he was getting 7 billion when he signed up for this policy. You think he got lucky becuase they considered it one event, but I'm sure he feels screwed.
For someone who came on to this forum giving an incorrect amount of the actual pay-out, you are probably a little out of line.
I have come up with multiple sources to support my theory. If you can back up your theory I would love to hear it.
For someone who came on to this forum giving an incorrect amount of the actual pay-out, you are probably a little out of line.
I have come up with multiple sources to support my theory. If you can back up your theory I would love to hear it.
He was operating under the idea it was 7 billion. He thought he was getting 7 billion when he signed up for this policy. You think he got lucky becuase they considered it one event, but I'm sure he feels screwed.
How many times can you be wrong in one thread? The policy was for $3.55 billion (not $7 billion). He never thought it was for $7 billion. It was recommended that he have a policy in the $5 billion range and decided against it. Why would he think he had a policy for $7 billion?????????
And it wasn't considered one event, it was considered TWO events.
Out of line? Why? Because you can't even wrap your mind around the facts re. this?
He was operating under the idea it was 7 billion. He thought he was getting 7 billion when he signed up for this policy. You think he got lucky becuase they considered it one event, but I'm sure he feels screwed.
How many times can you be wrong in one thread? The policy was for $3.55 billion (not $7 billion). He never thought it was for $7 billion. It was recommended that he have a policy in the $5 billion range and decided against it. Why would he think he had a policy for $7 billion?????????
And it wasn't considered one event, it was considered TWO events.
Out of line? Why? Because you can't even wrap your mind around the facts re. this?
You are missing the point... still. Okay... so the insurance policy was for 3.55... But he argued that it was two attacks... meaning when he signed that policy he wanted to get money for two separate attacks. 3.55 x 2 = 7.1 billion.
The Port Authority had carried only $1.5 billion in insurance coverage on all its buildings, including the WTC, but Silverstein’s lenders insist on more, eventually demanding $3.55 billion in cover. [American Lawyer, 9/3/2002] After 9/11, Larry Silverstein will claim the attacks on the World Trade Center constituted two separate events, thereby entitling him to a double payout totaling over $7 billion. [Daily Telegraph, 10/9/2001; Guardian, 8/18/2002] Eventually, after several years of legal wrangling, a total of $4.55 billion of insurance money will be paid out for the destruction of the WTC (see May 23, 2007). Most of this appears to go to Silverstein Properties. How much goes to Westfield America Inc. is unclear.WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein is supposed to be working today in the temporary offices of his company, Silverstein Properties, on the 88th floor of the North Tower. However, at his Park Avenue apartment, Silverstein’s wife reportedly “laid down the law: The developer could not cancel an appointment with his dermatologist, even to meet with tenants at his most important property.” [New York Observer, 3/17/2003; New York Magazine, 4/18/2005] He is therefore not at the WTC when it is hit, and first hears of the attacks when an associate calls him from the lobby of one of the WTC buildings. [Real Deal, 1/2004] Two of Silverstein’s children—his son, Roger, and daughter, Lisa—work for his company and have been regularly attending meetings with WTC tenants at Windows on the World (the restaurant at the top of the North Tower). Yet this morning they are running late. According to the New York Observer, “If the attack had happened just a little later, Mr. Silverstein’s children would likely have been trapped at Windows.” [New York Observer, 3/17/2003] Fifty-four of Silverstein Properties’ 160 staff are in the North Tower when it is hit, and four of them die. [Globe and Mail, 9/7/2002] Silverstein signed the lease on the WTC less than two months previously, and later will attempt to get $7 billion in insurance for the destruction of the towers (see July 24, 2001).
You are missing the point... still. Okay... so the insurance policy was for 3.55... But he argued that it was two attacks... meaning when he signed that policy he wanted to get money for two separate attacks. 3.55 x 2 = 7.1 billion.
The Port Authority had carried only $1.5 billion in insurance coverage on all its buildings, including the WTC, but Silverstein’s lenders insist on more, eventually demanding $3.55 billion in cover. [American Lawyer, 9/3/2002] After 9/11, Larry Silverstein will claim the attacks on the World Trade Center constituted two separate events, thereby entitling him to a double payout totaling over $7 billion. [Daily Telegraph, 10/9/2001; Guardian, 8/18/2002] Eventually, after several years of legal wrangling, a total of $4.55 billion of insurance money will be paid out for the destruction of the WTC (see May 23, 2007). Most of this appears to go to Silverstein Properties. How much goes to Westfield America Inc. is unclear.WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein is supposed to be working today in the temporary offices of his company, Silverstein Properties, on the 88th floor of the North Tower. However, at his Park Avenue apartment, Silverstein’s wife reportedly “laid down the law: The developer could not cancel an appointment with his dermatologist, even to meet with tenants at his most important property.” [New York Observer, 3/17/2003; New York Magazine, 4/18/2005] He is therefore not at the WTC when it is hit, and first hears of the attacks when an associate calls him from the lobby of one of the WTC buildings. [Real Deal, 1/2004] Two of Silverstein’s children—his son, Roger, and daughter, Lisa—work for his company and have been regularly attending meetings with WTC tenants at Windows on the World (the restaurant at the top of the North Tower). Yet this morning they are running late. According to the New York Observer, “If the attack had happened just a little later, Mr. Silverstein’s children would likely have been trapped at Windows.” [New York Observer, 3/17/2003] Fifty-four of Silverstein Properties’ 160 staff are in the North Tower when it is hit, and four of them die. [Globe and Mail, 9/7/2002] Silverstein signed the lease on the WTC less than two months previously, and later will attempt to get $7 billion in insurance for the destruction of the towers (see July 24, 2001).
Hutch, you are still stuck on the numbers. Do you have anything else? Kind of interesting how Silverstein wasn't in his office in the north tower on 9/11 huh?
I've continued to back up my theory with sources.. You have nothing to support anything the media has claimed.
Hutch, you are still stuck on the numbers. Do you have anything else? Kind of interesting how Silverstein wasn't in his office in the north tower on 9/11 huh?
I've continued to back up my theory with sources.. You have nothing to support anything the media has claimed.
I don't think those people avoiding the attacks on 9/11 is a coincidence at all. I've already related government, media, and entertainment industry in my first post. The only source you have provided only argues my point further.
So you just admitted he took out an insurance policy two months prior specifically for an event that actually happened... and he's not in his office the morning of 9/11?
Yes, random crazy shit does happen sometimes. The problem with all of these "coincidences" is they actually make sense logically. It's not easy waking up, the truth is a hard thing to deal with, and I sympathise with you.
This isn't just about 9/11 anymore Hutch. I've connect 9/11, Aurora, and unfortunately... what could be coming in the olympics. You come on to this thread and still have nothing to counter what my theory has shown.
I don't think those people avoiding the attacks on 9/11 is a coincidence at all. I've already related government, media, and entertainment industry in my first post. The only source you have provided only argues my point further.
So you just admitted he took out an insurance policy two months prior specifically for an event that actually happened... and he's not in his office the morning of 9/11?
Yes, random crazy shit does happen sometimes. The problem with all of these "coincidences" is they actually make sense logically. It's not easy waking up, the truth is a hard thing to deal with, and I sympathise with you.
This isn't just about 9/11 anymore Hutch. I've connect 9/11, Aurora, and unfortunately... what could be coming in the olympics. You come on to this thread and still have nothing to counter what my theory has shown.
What no one has done is make the connection on WHEN exactly it will happen. The "Dark Knight Rises" movie is significant because they planned an attack around it. During a scene in that movie, the questions is asked... "How long do we have until the nuke B goes off?" The response is "23 days". The movie opened on 7/20 (day of that aurora bs). 23 days from 7/20 is August 12, 2012... which happens to be the same day as the olympic closing ceremonies. |
What no one has done is make the connection on WHEN exactly it will happen. The "Dark Knight Rises" movie is significant because they planned an attack around it. During a scene in that movie, the questions is asked... "How long do we have until the nuke B goes off?" The response is "23 days". The movie opened on 7/20 (day of that aurora bs). 23 days from 7/20 is August 12, 2012... which happens to be the same day as the olympic closing ceremonies. |
so was christopher nolan in on it? or did these illuminati guys get a super advanced screening and said, "oh shit, it says 23 days, we have to make them release it exactly on this day so it lines up with the closing ceremonies and for good measure we will throw in some mass shooting so it symbolizes the start of the 23 days".
What no one has done is make the connection on WHEN exactly it will happen. The "Dark Knight Rises" movie is significant because they planned an attack around it. During a scene in that movie, the questions is asked... "How long do we have until the nuke B goes off?" The response is "23 days". The movie opened on 7/20 (day of that aurora bs). 23 days from 7/20 is August 12, 2012... which happens to be the same day as the olympic closing ceremonies. |
What no one has done is make the connection on WHEN exactly it will happen. The "Dark Knight Rises" movie is significant because they planned an attack around it. During a scene in that movie, the questions is asked... "How long do we have until the nuke B goes off?" The response is "23 days". The movie opened on 7/20 (day of that aurora bs). 23 days from 7/20 is August 12, 2012... which happens to be the same day as the olympic closing ceremonies. |
so was christopher nolan in on it? or did these illuminati guys get a super advanced screening and said, "oh shit, it says 23 days, we have to make them release it exactly on this day so it lines up with the closing ceremonies and for good measure we will throw in some mass shooting so it symbolizes the start of the 23 days".
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.