On my way to work I meet this homeless woman who says the secret police have implanted chips into our brains. Guess she's just connected the dots differently... She could be right, you know. Oh and why not say that the mentally ill are the ones who have the truth about everything? Don't use your common sense, logic or anything. They COULD be right!!!
Hey she might know something we don't. I don't understand how this guy writing the post is mentally ill? I personally haven't had a close look at all the details, but through a scan I don't think that most of it is true, but I do believe there is some truth in there. To what extent ? I dunno.
What kind of logic are you using? If the majority of the people don't believe it, it must be false?
When Galileo discovered that the round was round not flat, do you think everyone jumped up and down and say "Yes we are all so stupid?" No they rejected it, they always believed the world is flat... it's very hard for people to change their mind from so called "facts"
All I'm saying is don't be quick to judge. The thread creator here may possible be very mistaken... I dunno. Just please have an open mind before you dismiss everything.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RJSmith:
On my way to work I meet this homeless woman who says the secret police have implanted chips into our brains. Guess she's just connected the dots differently... She could be right, you know. Oh and why not say that the mentally ill are the ones who have the truth about everything? Don't use your common sense, logic or anything. They COULD be right!!!
Hey she might know something we don't. I don't understand how this guy writing the post is mentally ill? I personally haven't had a close look at all the details, but through a scan I don't think that most of it is true, but I do believe there is some truth in there. To what extent ? I dunno.
What kind of logic are you using? If the majority of the people don't believe it, it must be false?
When Galileo discovered that the round was round not flat, do you think everyone jumped up and down and say "Yes we are all so stupid?" No they rejected it, they always believed the world is flat... it's very hard for people to change their mind from so called "facts"
All I'm saying is don't be quick to judge. The thread creator here may possible be very mistaken... I dunno. Just please have an open mind before you dismiss everything.
When I'm wrong, and I hope I am... I will be on here apologizing for wasting everyones time, and thats not saying much because I'm just an avatar to all of you. I've never had a problem admitting when I'm wrong anyway.
I've told my friends and family to stay out of London... imagine what the people I care about are going to think. They already know drinks are on me. This topic is stressful and no where near pleasant. When I'm wrong, I'm excited to take up some new hobbies. I was in persuit of the truth, and this is exactly where it lead me.
Aside from being labeled as a "wacko"... not one person has actually countered what i've put together. This isn't just my opinion... I've backed up every conclusion made with multiple sources, none of which I created.
0
When I'm wrong, and I hope I am... I will be on here apologizing for wasting everyones time, and thats not saying much because I'm just an avatar to all of you. I've never had a problem admitting when I'm wrong anyway.
I've told my friends and family to stay out of London... imagine what the people I care about are going to think. They already know drinks are on me. This topic is stressful and no where near pleasant. When I'm wrong, I'm excited to take up some new hobbies. I was in persuit of the truth, and this is exactly where it lead me.
Aside from being labeled as a "wacko"... not one person has actually countered what i've put together. This isn't just my opinion... I've backed up every conclusion made with multiple sources, none of which I created.
Some things is this thread are not facts Larry, like linking
Silverstein signed the lease on the WTC less than two months to meaning it was planned is not a fact but a connection that you have made that makes it seem quite possible. About predicting the future that's a bit left field for me personally, but hey you may be right. I hope you are not though
0
Some things is this thread are not facts Larry, like linking
Silverstein signed the lease on the WTC less than two months to meaning it was planned is not a fact but a connection that you have made that makes it seem quite possible. About predicting the future that's a bit left field for me personally, but hey you may be right. I hope you are not though
This is going to be very difficult to discuss with people who haven't taken any time to look at my original post. I understand it's going to take more than 10 minutes.... but if you want to make me look foolish it may be worth your time.
When you figure it out, please let me know so I can sleep a little better tonight.
0
This is going to be very difficult to discuss with people who haven't taken any time to look at my original post. I understand it's going to take more than 10 minutes.... but if you want to make me look foolish it may be worth your time.
When you figure it out, please let me know so I can sleep a little better tonight.
I'm not here to make you look foolish. I like your some links in your post they are interesting reads. Unfortunately I don't want to spend all day reading the 9/11, I have watched a doco on it a while ago.The main reason got involved in this convo was it annoyed me people just calling you crazy and having a mental illness without explaining their reasoning behind. I personally think if you are going to do that you need they need to know your reasoning, but I think most people like name calling to boost their ego's.
I think you took my post the wrong way
0
I'm not here to make you look foolish. I like your some links in your post they are interesting reads. Unfortunately I don't want to spend all day reading the 9/11, I have watched a doco on it a while ago.The main reason got involved in this convo was it annoyed me people just calling you crazy and having a mental illness without explaining their reasoning behind. I personally think if you are going to do that you need they need to know your reasoning, but I think most people like name calling to boost their ego's.
I'm sure this is the only mistake the media has ever made. These are old and boring arguments. Why are you just getting to them now. It's completely apparent you haven't done dick for research on this.
What
most likely, logically happened: While investigating and updating information
on the collapse of the towers, someone at the BBC was given a report/press
release that building 7 was going to collapse. [Edit: we now know they
were monitoring the news from different outlets and that's where they learned
of building 7.] According to the fire department, by 2:00PM they knew the
building would soon collapse. Reporters KNEW this well before the collapse
because there are videos of reporters talking about it before it happened. So
we KNOW reporters were given information on WTC 7's imminent demise. We can
conclude from this evidence that the fire department relayed information to
reporters that the building was going to collapse. By the time the report
reached the reporter at the BBC, it may have simply been miscommunicatedfrom "About to
collapse" to "Has collapsed". She even starts out by saying
"Details are very, very sketchy". That alone should put this to rest.
She didn't say 'Sketchy'. She didn't say 'very sketchy'. She said "very, very
sketchy".
It wouldn't be the first time reporters got something so
completely wrong. They said it was a small plane at first, remember? They said
Kerry choose Gephardt for VP, remember? They told the family members of trapped
mine workers that their 13 loved ones were alive, all but one, when it was the
other way around.
I'm sure this is the only mistake the media has ever made. These are old and boring arguments. Why are you just getting to them now. It's completely apparent you haven't done dick for research on this.
What
most likely, logically happened: While investigating and updating information
on the collapse of the towers, someone at the BBC was given a report/press
release that building 7 was going to collapse. [Edit: we now know they
were monitoring the news from different outlets and that's where they learned
of building 7.] According to the fire department, by 2:00PM they knew the
building would soon collapse. Reporters KNEW this well before the collapse
because there are videos of reporters talking about it before it happened. So
we KNOW reporters were given information on WTC 7's imminent demise. We can
conclude from this evidence that the fire department relayed information to
reporters that the building was going to collapse. By the time the report
reached the reporter at the BBC, it may have simply been miscommunicatedfrom "About to
collapse" to "Has collapsed". She even starts out by saying
"Details are very, very sketchy". That alone should put this to rest.
She didn't say 'Sketchy'. She didn't say 'very sketchy'. She said "very, very
sketchy".
It wouldn't be the first time reporters got something so
completely wrong. They said it was a small plane at first, remember? They said
Kerry choose Gephardt for VP, remember? They told the family members of trapped
mine workers that their 13 loved ones were alive, all but one, when it was the
other way around.
This is going to be very difficult to discuss with people who haven't taken any time to look at my original post. I understand it's going to take more than 10 minutes.... but if you want to make me look foolish it may be worth your time.
When you figure it out, please let me know so I can sleep a little better tonight.
It will be difficult to discuss because I'm the only one stupid enough to debate this with you. Everyone else knows you haven't done shit for research and are posting a bunch of outdated and inaccurate links.....many of which you don't even understand.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Larry_Legend:
This is going to be very difficult to discuss with people who haven't taken any time to look at my original post. I understand it's going to take more than 10 minutes.... but if you want to make me look foolish it may be worth your time.
When you figure it out, please let me know so I can sleep a little better tonight.
It will be difficult to discuss because I'm the only one stupid enough to debate this with you. Everyone else knows you haven't done shit for research and are posting a bunch of outdated and inaccurate links.....many of which you don't even understand.
Seriously, THINK about it. Reporters can't keep their mouths shut. You really think the government wanted them in on this? You're insane.
Name me one advantage they would gain by telling reporters ahead of time. ONE!
The downright absurd conspiracy story: The government told many reporters to report something they would have reported anyway after the building collapsed.
A little critical thinking is all that's needed to debunk this nonsense. Why in the world would they make an already unbelievably massive conspiracy into one involving reporters who would LOVE a scoop like that? "Sept. 9, 2001 - EXCLUSIVE BREAKING NEWS! Government about to murder thousands for oil! We have the script!" Can you imagine the job offerings after a scoop like that? Can you say Pulitzer prize? What a hero! Who would pass that up to help a shadowy government commit the mass murder of Americans? This would be MUCH bigger than Watergate! Or maybe this was a planed gaffe to expose this plot? Are we to believe this gaffe is the only way she could have told us? A method which could easily be dismissed as typical poor reporting?
0
Seriously, THINK about it. Reporters can't keep their mouths shut. You really think the government wanted them in on this? You're insane.
Name me one advantage they would gain by telling reporters ahead of time. ONE!
The downright absurd conspiracy story: The government told many reporters to report something they would have reported anyway after the building collapsed.
A little critical thinking is all that's needed to debunk this nonsense. Why in the world would they make an already unbelievably massive conspiracy into one involving reporters who would LOVE a scoop like that? "Sept. 9, 2001 - EXCLUSIVE BREAKING NEWS! Government about to murder thousands for oil! We have the script!" Can you imagine the job offerings after a scoop like that? Can you say Pulitzer prize? What a hero! Who would pass that up to help a shadowy government commit the mass murder of Americans? This would be MUCH bigger than Watergate! Or maybe this was a planed gaffe to expose this plot? Are we to believe this gaffe is the only way she could have told us? A method which could easily be dismissed as typical poor reporting?
Perhaps I did GSP... and for that I apologize. Your post regarding the 'lease' within two months is incorrect... it was the insurance policy we were talking about, which is why I said that.
I'm not worried about the name calling but thanks for looking out. I want someone to actually prove me wrong.
0
Perhaps I did GSP... and for that I apologize. Your post regarding the 'lease' within two months is incorrect... it was the insurance policy we were talking about, which is why I said that.
I'm not worried about the name calling but thanks for looking out. I want someone to actually prove me wrong.
Good point about there is no reason to tell reporters before by HutchEmAll. I can't think of any reason to tell reporters and they would want to keep it closer secret.
Npz Larry. I'm not here to take sides, I'm a neutral and just make up my own mind.
This is turning out to be an interesting "discussion"
0
Good point about there is no reason to tell reporters before by HutchEmAll. I can't think of any reason to tell reporters and they would want to keep it closer secret.
Npz Larry. I'm not here to take sides, I'm a neutral and just make up my own mind.
This is turning out to be an interesting "discussion"
What is disappointing is the lack of YouTube Videos... Everybody knows the first thing you do when you want to prove a conspiracy beyond any conceivable doubt is produce a YouTube Video...
Where's the Video???
No YouTube Video is absolute proof the conspiracy theory is BS... FACT...
0
What is disappointing is the lack of YouTube Videos... Everybody knows the first thing you do when you want to prove a conspiracy beyond any conceivable doubt is produce a YouTube Video...
Where's the Video???
No YouTube Video is absolute proof the conspiracy theory is BS... FACT...
I'm glad you are back Hutch... the irony is that I'm actually rooting for you to be right.
So... they did IN FACT report building 7's collapse before it happened... then the news has to argue their way out of this fact... is that your position on this topic? Well shit... if I had to do that, I would have written the exact article above.
Why did building 7 collapse again?Did Larry Silverstein own that building too?Hmmm…
I know you have "literally thousands of post on re. 9/11" and I will listen to what you have to say... but I want to take this opportunity to point out 9/11 is only a part of what I put together in my original post. It's important, yes, but it's not the fully story.
"Reporters can't keep their mouths shut"... sounds like you have categorized them almost as quickly as you categorized me as being "insane".
The media was certainly involved that day.One reason would be that their agenda is much more important than any trophy one individual could receive.
Were you able to explain anything from this article?
I'm glad you are back Hutch... the irony is that I'm actually rooting for you to be right.
So... they did IN FACT report building 7's collapse before it happened... then the news has to argue their way out of this fact... is that your position on this topic? Well shit... if I had to do that, I would have written the exact article above.
Why did building 7 collapse again?Did Larry Silverstein own that building too?Hmmm…
I know you have "literally thousands of post on re. 9/11" and I will listen to what you have to say... but I want to take this opportunity to point out 9/11 is only a part of what I put together in my original post. It's important, yes, but it's not the fully story.
"Reporters can't keep their mouths shut"... sounds like you have categorized them almost as quickly as you categorized me as being "insane".
The media was certainly involved that day.One reason would be that their agenda is much more important than any trophy one individual could receive.
Were you able to explain anything from this article?
Larry_Legend, give it up man, I posted over 50 things about this topic and the response was just 50, coincidental things, which just happened that way.
I’ve literally seen every documentary and read everything about this topic. People diss YouTube, but if it is uploaded by the corporate media, well then. It must be true.
YouTube videos are just people copying dvd documentaries, and posting them on their YouTube channels. So, repeatedly saying, well if it is on YouTube it must be true... is fucking stupid.
It took me a couple of hours to read and watch everything I could find. The amount of information available to read and watch took what felt like forever…
An independent investigation of the 9/11 terrorist attack https://911research.com/
This website has pretty much everything. They’re not going to read or watch anything you post...
0
Larry_Legend, give it up man, I posted over 50 things about this topic and the response was just 50, coincidental things, which just happened that way.
I’ve literally seen every documentary and read everything about this topic. People diss YouTube, but if it is uploaded by the corporate media, well then. It must be true.
YouTube videos are just people copying dvd documentaries, and posting them on their YouTube channels. So, repeatedly saying, well if it is on YouTube it must be true... is fucking stupid.
It took me a couple of hours to read and watch everything I could find. The amount of information available to read and watch took what felt like forever…
An independent investigation of the 9/11 terrorist attack https://911research.com/
This website has pretty much everything. They’re not going to read or watch anything you post...
MoneySRH - I appreciate the feedback and thank you for the website. Couldn't agree more on how people view youtube... its automatially written off without actually making an argument against what is said in the video.
The big difference now MoneySRH, is I'm not just talking about 9/11 and what happened in the past. Lets say you and I are on to something... do you think they were going to stop at 9/11? What's their next move?
You don't have to answer that. If you want to know what I think refer back to my original post.
Thanks again.
0
MoneySRH - I appreciate the feedback and thank you for the website. Couldn't agree more on how people view youtube... its automatially written off without actually making an argument against what is said in the video.
The big difference now MoneySRH, is I'm not just talking about 9/11 and what happened in the past. Lets say you and I are on to something... do you think they were going to stop at 9/11? What's their next move?
You don't have to answer that. If you want to know what I think refer back to my original post.
MoneySRH - I appreciate the feedback and thank you for the website. Couldn't agree more on how people view youtube... its automatially written off without actually making an argument against what is said in the video.
The big difference now MoneySRH, is I'm not just talking about 9/11 and what happened in the past. Lets say you and I are on to something... do you think they were going to stop at 9/11? What's their next move?
You don't have to answer that. If you want to know what I think refer back to my original post.
Thanks again.
#66
I'll be at Hyde Park all day.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Larry_Legend:
MoneySRH - I appreciate the feedback and thank you for the website. Couldn't agree more on how people view youtube... its automatially written off without actually making an argument against what is said in the video.
The big difference now MoneySRH, is I'm not just talking about 9/11 and what happened in the past. Lets say you and I are on to something... do you think they were going to stop at 9/11? What's their next move?
You don't have to answer that. If you want to know what I think refer back to my original post.
What is disappointing is the lack of YouTube Videos... Everybody knows the first thing you do when you want to prove a conspiracy beyond any conceivable doubt is produce a YouTube Video...
Where's the Video???
No YouTube Video is absolute proof the conspiracy theory is BS... FACT...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Randisist:
What is disappointing is the lack of YouTube Videos... Everybody knows the first thing you do when you want to prove a conspiracy beyond any conceivable doubt is produce a YouTube Video...
Where's the Video???
No YouTube Video is absolute proof the conspiracy theory is BS... FACT...
MoneySRH - I appreciate the feedback and thank you for the website. Couldn't agree more on how people view youtube... its automatially written off without actually making an argument against what is said in the video.
The big difference now MoneySRH, is I'm not just talking about 9/11 and what happened in the past. Lets say you and I are on to something... do you think they were going to stop at 9/11? What's their next move?
You don't have to answer that. If you want to know what I think refer back to my original post.
Thanks again.
You are of the opinion that the US Gov set up the shooting in Aurora?
Just for the record.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Larry_Legend:
MoneySRH - I appreciate the feedback and thank you for the website. Couldn't agree more on how people view youtube... its automatially written off without actually making an argument against what is said in the video.
The big difference now MoneySRH, is I'm not just talking about 9/11 and what happened in the past. Lets say you and I are on to something... do you think they were going to stop at 9/11? What's their next move?
You don't have to answer that. If you want to know what I think refer back to my original post.
Thanks again.
You are of the opinion that the US Gov set up the shooting in Aurora?
MoneySRH - I appreciate the feedback and thank you for the website. Couldn't agree more on how people view youtube... its automatially written off without actually making an argument against what is said in the video.
The big difference now MoneySRH, is I'm not just talking about 9/11 and what happened in the past. Lets say you and I are on to something... do you think they were going to stop at 9/11? What's their next move?
You don't have to answer that. If you want to know what I think refer back to my original post.
Thanks again.
I disagree with your theory. I'm open to the 911 theory and the Olympics possibly being apart of the Illuminati plan, but the shooting...nope. The first moon landing is on YouTube, well I guess that means it's BS
0
Quote Originally Posted by Larry_Legend:
MoneySRH - I appreciate the feedback and thank you for the website. Couldn't agree more on how people view youtube... its automatially written off without actually making an argument against what is said in the video.
The big difference now MoneySRH, is I'm not just talking about 9/11 and what happened in the past. Lets say you and I are on to something... do you think they were going to stop at 9/11? What's their next move?
You don't have to answer that. If you want to know what I think refer back to my original post.
Thanks again.
I disagree with your theory. I'm open to the 911 theory and the Olympics possibly being apart of the Illuminati plan, but the shooting...nope. The first moon landing is on YouTube, well I guess that means it's BS
I disagree with your theory. I'm open to the 911 theory and the Olympics possibly being apart of the Illuminati plan, but the shooting...nope. The first moon landing is on YouTube, well I guess that means it's BS
No, no, no... Jiminy Crickets... A video on YouTube is absolute, undisputed, irrefutable proof that whatever is said or shown on the video is Absolute FACT... Especially if it it portrays the US Government as being filled with blood thrust killers whose sole agenda is to kill US citizens...
Gees... It ain't that complicated. All you have to do is remember the US Government is behind the plot.
NOTE: "plot" being a generic term term for any and all bad things in America and involving America...
0
Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:
I disagree with your theory. I'm open to the 911 theory and the Olympics possibly being apart of the Illuminati plan, but the shooting...nope. The first moon landing is on YouTube, well I guess that means it's BS
No, no, no... Jiminy Crickets... A video on YouTube is absolute, undisputed, irrefutable proof that whatever is said or shown on the video is Absolute FACT... Especially if it it portrays the US Government as being filled with blood thrust killers whose sole agenda is to kill US citizens...
Gees... It ain't that complicated. All you have to do is remember the US Government is behind the plot.
NOTE: "plot" being a generic term term for any and all bad things in America and involving America...
I didn't put the entire youtube library in my post. Can we start by agreeing with that? If you can argue what I have posted please do.
Most everything I have come up with is outside of what most of you are conditioned to believe. I certainly wasn't raised to believe anything I am talking about. I've heard the official story just like you have.
What I have realized over the past day and a half since I've posted this is how much hate there is towards me for saying something that I can actually discuss. I'm not out to harm or offend anyone here or anywhere else. When all you haters are completely right, I will be just as happy as you but for different reasons... you will have successfully shot a guy down for trying to help but he was wrong and I will be wrong about a prediction that is hard to sleep with. We want the same thing.
I want to be wrong but post after post after post its the same bs about how I'm wacko, and youtube is junk... then nobody actually supports anything they say. If you can argue the videos I have posted then please SOMEONE step up and do it.
I'm labeled as a lunatic but no one actually knows who I am. I certailny hope I haven't made judgements on who you are... from this view I see a kungfu panda, a blazing hot chic, an oilers fan, and someone who likely follows wrestling.... after that I'm looking for what you have to support your claims. If you find no problems with what you have been told, then good for you, now you have nothing to worry about. I still find it much more comforting to believe the media myself.
0
I didn't put the entire youtube library in my post. Can we start by agreeing with that? If you can argue what I have posted please do.
Most everything I have come up with is outside of what most of you are conditioned to believe. I certainly wasn't raised to believe anything I am talking about. I've heard the official story just like you have.
What I have realized over the past day and a half since I've posted this is how much hate there is towards me for saying something that I can actually discuss. I'm not out to harm or offend anyone here or anywhere else. When all you haters are completely right, I will be just as happy as you but for different reasons... you will have successfully shot a guy down for trying to help but he was wrong and I will be wrong about a prediction that is hard to sleep with. We want the same thing.
I want to be wrong but post after post after post its the same bs about how I'm wacko, and youtube is junk... then nobody actually supports anything they say. If you can argue the videos I have posted then please SOMEONE step up and do it.
I'm labeled as a lunatic but no one actually knows who I am. I certailny hope I haven't made judgements on who you are... from this view I see a kungfu panda, a blazing hot chic, an oilers fan, and someone who likely follows wrestling.... after that I'm looking for what you have to support your claims. If you find no problems with what you have been told, then good for you, now you have nothing to worry about. I still find it much more comforting to believe the media myself.
I dont think you understand. It was genius to take less insurance out.....then he still gets fat paid and no one blames him for not being able to rebuild.....which he had zero intention of doing. Its not that hard to figure out.
0
Hutch-
I dont think you understand. It was genius to take less insurance out.....then he still gets fat paid and no one blames him for not being able to rebuild.....which he had zero intention of doing. Its not that hard to figure out.
I do find the Illuminati cards to be very eye-opening. The one pertaining to the London Olympics seems strange, but are there not other cities with similar clocks like Big Ben (but on a smaller scale), such as Boston? I am sure you could compare the numerology and find some connection again with Boston.
Finally, I dont find the shooting to be very strange. All was quiet in the news leading up to the weekend. This shooting now allows all of America to grieve and feel connected/engulfed with the story. Same exact situation as a small scale story like the Trayvon Martin case to get all of America involved and keep everyone ''busy''. This guy may have been crazy and all of that, but now the government can push bills pertaining to gun laws. The movie theatre industry has been suffering and I dont see how a shooting in one would get more people to go back sooner even with more security in the future. The economy is to blame for low income and high movie prices (also netflix services). So I throw out a government planned shooting (I think we just have a smart kid who failed school and had an obsession with batman and took it out in his town at the theatre).
Also...I dont see how this WTT owner would benefit from his London mall being destroyed unless he has another huge insurance policy on it.
0
I do find the Illuminati cards to be very eye-opening. The one pertaining to the London Olympics seems strange, but are there not other cities with similar clocks like Big Ben (but on a smaller scale), such as Boston? I am sure you could compare the numerology and find some connection again with Boston.
Finally, I dont find the shooting to be very strange. All was quiet in the news leading up to the weekend. This shooting now allows all of America to grieve and feel connected/engulfed with the story. Same exact situation as a small scale story like the Trayvon Martin case to get all of America involved and keep everyone ''busy''. This guy may have been crazy and all of that, but now the government can push bills pertaining to gun laws. The movie theatre industry has been suffering and I dont see how a shooting in one would get more people to go back sooner even with more security in the future. The economy is to blame for low income and high movie prices (also netflix services). So I throw out a government planned shooting (I think we just have a smart kid who failed school and had an obsession with batman and took it out in his town at the theatre).
Also...I dont see how this WTT owner would benefit from his London mall being destroyed unless he has another huge insurance policy on it.
Larry_Legend is entitled to his opinion. Some of you guys are acting like Christians getting all assholish just because he believes something different than you do. Keep it coming, Larry. Interesting stuff.
I was wondering which asshole would be the first to bring religion into it, congratulations.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Henry-Lilly:
Larry_Legend is entitled to his opinion. Some of you guys are acting like Christians getting all assholish just because he believes something different than you do. Keep it coming, Larry. Interesting stuff.
I was wondering which asshole would be the first to bring religion into it, congratulations.
"This guy may have been crazy and all of that, but now the government can push bills pertaining to gun laws."
Ummm... thats exactly what they want... to keep restriciting gun rights. If this was actually staged Cleek, they would have killed people, lied to you about it, then the same people would have restricted your rights to get the very gun protecting you from them.
"Also...I dont see how this WTT owner would benefit from his London mall being destroyed unless he has another huge insurance policy on it."
They were partners, I stated that in my first post. There is also another article posedt in here on how Westfield Inc. received an undisclosed amount of the insurance claim.
Good luck to you.
0
Cleek
"This guy may have been crazy and all of that, but now the government can push bills pertaining to gun laws."
Ummm... thats exactly what they want... to keep restriciting gun rights. If this was actually staged Cleek, they would have killed people, lied to you about it, then the same people would have restricted your rights to get the very gun protecting you from them.
"Also...I dont see how this WTT owner would benefit from his London mall being destroyed unless he has another huge insurance policy on it."
They were partners, I stated that in my first post. There is also another article posedt in here on how Westfield Inc. received an undisclosed amount of the insurance claim.
One of the major criticisms that Obama is hearing from his voters is that he has avoided the gun control issue. Much like the rest of his Presidency, he has ignored that specific issue that he campaigned on 4 years ago. He's not doing anything to our guns, lets get over it.
You really think President Bush is an evil enough man to let thousands of innocent men, women and children get murdered like that? You really think he is EVIL?
All the different conspiracy theories being compiled into one was just a little too crazy for me. You can always find a way to connect dots if you really want to connect dots. This was a little too outlandish.
0
One of the major criticisms that Obama is hearing from his voters is that he has avoided the gun control issue. Much like the rest of his Presidency, he has ignored that specific issue that he campaigned on 4 years ago. He's not doing anything to our guns, lets get over it.
You really think President Bush is an evil enough man to let thousands of innocent men, women and children get murdered like that? You really think he is EVIL?
All the different conspiracy theories being compiled into one was just a little too crazy for me. You can always find a way to connect dots if you really want to connect dots. This was a little too outlandish.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.