Kennedy was assassinated by a lone gunman, intoxicated by his desperation for notoriety, such as, the time he defected to the Soviet Union. Even the Kremlin thought Oswald was nutty and was glad to see him eventually return to the US.
If the CIA or other secret society wanted to kill JFK and used Oswald as its proxy, they would have never allowed the Dallas police to apprehend him. They would've taken him out themselves.
The moon landing was real.
9/11 was an operation planned and performed by an extremist Islamic sect.
Government "conspiracies" eventually come out into the open to the point where insiders not deny them. You think the CIA wanted everyone to know about Bay of Pigs and the overthrow of Mohammed Mossadeq in Iran?
Occam's razor, people
Read "Case Closed" by Posner. The most complete forensic examination of the JFK assasination. Leaves NOTHING unexplained.
Kennedy was assassinated by a lone gunman, intoxicated by his desperation for notoriety, such as, the time he defected to the Soviet Union. Even the Kremlin thought Oswald was nutty and was glad to see him eventually return to the US.
If the CIA or other secret society wanted to kill JFK and used Oswald as its proxy, they would have never allowed the Dallas police to apprehend him. They would've taken him out themselves.
The moon landing was real.
9/11 was an operation planned and performed by an extremist Islamic sect.
Government "conspiracies" eventually come out into the open to the point where insiders not deny them. You think the CIA wanted everyone to know about Bay of Pigs and the overthrow of Mohammed Mossadeq in Iran?
Occam's razor, people
Read "Case Closed" by Posner. The most complete forensic examination of the JFK assasination. Leaves NOTHING unexplained.
Okay, I'll have an intelectual conversation about this.
The notion that hundreds of agents can work in unison to pull off 9/11 (hijack planes, implode the towers via a controlled demolition, have agents load the towers with TNT while no one's looking) is indicative of the paranoia that can cloud one's mind.
Yes, it generates a load of self-satisfaction to assume that you and a select group of theorists are privy to the malevolent motives of the government. You fancy the day that all "truth" will come out and you'll all be vindicated and lauded for being modern day Upton Sinclairs.
In addition, to leave the reasons why tragedy occurs open is too mentally taxing for some people. That there can be nuance is unbearable. Everything must be explained, ergo, that's why so many harebrained theories are posited everywhere.
And did I ever refer to our country as "Candy Land"? No, I reasoned why the Iraq "war" was started. There's no such thing as a benevolent superpower, but there must be empiricism and common sense when it comes to explaining why things happen.
Again, I'll go back to my WMD argument. If the govt is so omniscient, so cunning, why didn't it plant those WMDs in Iraq? If so, the invasion would have been justified and the Republican Party wouldn't be roiled right now. The fact is there are too many Keystone Kops in government for a scheme like that to happen. Just like hundreds of them couldn't work behind the scenes to assassinate JFK, land on the moon, or implode the Twin Towers without the truth coming out.
Okay, I'll have an intelectual conversation about this.
The notion that hundreds of agents can work in unison to pull off 9/11 (hijack planes, implode the towers via a controlled demolition, have agents load the towers with TNT while no one's looking) is indicative of the paranoia that can cloud one's mind.
Yes, it generates a load of self-satisfaction to assume that you and a select group of theorists are privy to the malevolent motives of the government. You fancy the day that all "truth" will come out and you'll all be vindicated and lauded for being modern day Upton Sinclairs.
In addition, to leave the reasons why tragedy occurs open is too mentally taxing for some people. That there can be nuance is unbearable. Everything must be explained, ergo, that's why so many harebrained theories are posited everywhere.
And did I ever refer to our country as "Candy Land"? No, I reasoned why the Iraq "war" was started. There's no such thing as a benevolent superpower, but there must be empiricism and common sense when it comes to explaining why things happen.
Again, I'll go back to my WMD argument. If the govt is so omniscient, so cunning, why didn't it plant those WMDs in Iraq? If so, the invasion would have been justified and the Republican Party wouldn't be roiled right now. The fact is there are too many Keystone Kops in government for a scheme like that to happen. Just like hundreds of them couldn't work behind the scenes to assassinate JFK, land on the moon, or implode the Twin Towers without the truth coming out.
Okay, I'll have an intelectual conversation about this.
The notion that hundreds of agents can work in unison to pull off 9/11 (hijack planes, implode the towers via a controlled demolition, have agents load the towers with TNT while no one's looking) is indicative of the paranoia that can cloud one's mind.
Yes, it generates a load of self-satisfaction to assume that you and a select group of theorists are privy to the malevolent motives of the government. You fancy the day that all "truth" will come out and you'll all be vindicated and lauded for being modern day Upton Sinclairs.
In addition, to leave the reasons why tragedy occurs open is too mentally taxing for some people. That there can be nuance is unbearable. Everything must be explained, ergo, that's why so many harebrained theories are posited everywhere.
And did I ever refer to our country as "Candy Land"? No, I reasoned why the Iraq "war" was started. There's no such thing as a benevolent superpower, but there must be empiricism and common sense when it comes to explaining why things happen.
Again, I'll go back to my WMD argument. If the govt is so omniscient, so cunning, why didn't it plant those WMDs in Iraq? If so, the invasion would have been justified and the Republican Party wouldn't be roiled right now. The fact is there are too many Keystone Kops in government for a scheme like that to happen. Just like hundreds of them couldn't work behind the scenes to assassinate JFK, land on the moon, or implode the Twin Towers without the truth coming out.
Lemon, thats your opinion. But i suggest you do some reading on how fires burn and building structures before making a final conclusion. There was a building in another state, that had 7 floors burn for 2 days and it never collapsed.
also look at the plane that supposdely hit the penatgon. Here you have one of the most secure buildings in the country and our govt has yet to produce one clear video of a plane actually hitting the building. We have satellites that can read the date on a dime from up in space, yet we dont have one clear video of a plane hitting the penatgon, yeah okay. Theres so many unanswered questions, nobody will ever know. What you do need to know thou, there is a group of people in this world working on a one world order, that my friend is real and those people will do anything to control the world and all its money. Everybody thinks guys like bill gates and warren buffet are the richest people in the world, lmfaooooo. There are people we will never know. who make those guys wealth look like chump change.
As far as wmd, they screwed up on that one. They should have planted some, but i think they just were so cocky they didnt bother to think about that.
Okay, I'll have an intelectual conversation about this.
The notion that hundreds of agents can work in unison to pull off 9/11 (hijack planes, implode the towers via a controlled demolition, have agents load the towers with TNT while no one's looking) is indicative of the paranoia that can cloud one's mind.
Yes, it generates a load of self-satisfaction to assume that you and a select group of theorists are privy to the malevolent motives of the government. You fancy the day that all "truth" will come out and you'll all be vindicated and lauded for being modern day Upton Sinclairs.
In addition, to leave the reasons why tragedy occurs open is too mentally taxing for some people. That there can be nuance is unbearable. Everything must be explained, ergo, that's why so many harebrained theories are posited everywhere.
And did I ever refer to our country as "Candy Land"? No, I reasoned why the Iraq "war" was started. There's no such thing as a benevolent superpower, but there must be empiricism and common sense when it comes to explaining why things happen.
Again, I'll go back to my WMD argument. If the govt is so omniscient, so cunning, why didn't it plant those WMDs in Iraq? If so, the invasion would have been justified and the Republican Party wouldn't be roiled right now. The fact is there are too many Keystone Kops in government for a scheme like that to happen. Just like hundreds of them couldn't work behind the scenes to assassinate JFK, land on the moon, or implode the Twin Towers without the truth coming out.
Lemon, thats your opinion. But i suggest you do some reading on how fires burn and building structures before making a final conclusion. There was a building in another state, that had 7 floors burn for 2 days and it never collapsed.
also look at the plane that supposdely hit the penatgon. Here you have one of the most secure buildings in the country and our govt has yet to produce one clear video of a plane actually hitting the building. We have satellites that can read the date on a dime from up in space, yet we dont have one clear video of a plane hitting the penatgon, yeah okay. Theres so many unanswered questions, nobody will ever know. What you do need to know thou, there is a group of people in this world working on a one world order, that my friend is real and those people will do anything to control the world and all its money. Everybody thinks guys like bill gates and warren buffet are the richest people in the world, lmfaooooo. There are people we will never know. who make those guys wealth look like chump change.
As far as wmd, they screwed up on that one. They should have planted some, but i think they just were so cocky they didnt bother to think about that.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.