All Forums | General Discussion

Marriage Equality

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4301
Posts: 69
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 11792
Posted: #26
Well....
It means nothing to me either way-
Obviously means a lot to those involved...
So.....great-
Maybe after the media has interviewed every homosexual in the United States , we can focus on priorities that are actually relevant to the well being of the nation as a whole......
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 485
Posted: #27

The acceptance of alternate lifestyles was one of the things that brought down Rome.

To view happy marriages as marriage equality only proves brainwashing.

This is all orchestrated....a town in Idaho has already passed  a law that pastors must perform same sex marriages or go to jail.

Tell me what happy couple would demand a pastor marry them if it wasn't purely for spite.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 27139
Posted: #28
https://i.imgur.com/9EHjU1k.gif
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2015
Posts: 2874
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by Coin Toss:

The acceptance of alternate lifestyles was one of the things that brought down Rome.

To view happy marriages as marriage equality only proves brainwashing.

This is all orchestrated....a town in Idaho has already passed  a law that pastors must perform same sex marriages or go to jail.

Tell me what happy couple would demand a pastor marry them if it wasn't purely for spite.


I love how the autocorrect changes "g@y" to "happy" -especially in this thread. Because now that they can get married, if we're going to go by what history has taught us odds are 65% of these marriages aren't going to be quite so "happy"

"OHHHHH, SWEET IRONY!!!!!!"
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #30
It has been funny to watch sara slim on full "tilt" ever since this ruling in this forum and the political one.

Being a closet case like him must be complicated and tough resulting in just a flood of odd posts.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 33785
Posted: #31

Quote Originally Posted by dl36:

It has been funny to watch sara slim on full "tilt" ever since this ruling in this forum and the political one.

Being a closet case like him must be complicated and tough resulting in just a flood of odd posts.

You better wise-up and evolve fast  ...Covers has change since you have been gone..

Homoophobic post like that one will get you boxed and maybe banned......so you need to stop ...and don't say ,that you haven't been warned..  

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 485
Posted: #32

GimmeMoneyNow,

Like someone else said, lawyers that specialize in happy marriage divorce cases are going to make a fortune.

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 4298
Posted: #33
G@ys deserve the right to be unhappy just like the rest of us.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 27139
Posted: #34
What do you mean this opened the floodgates for people involved in an abnormal lifestyle?

Please explain.

-popcorn-
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 33785
Posted: #35
 Transgender rights   NOW !!!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 33785
Posted: #36

After the above /\

The most natural advance next for marriage lies in legalized polygamy..............



 

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 33785
Posted: #37

After that the slope gets more slippery  “Love is love,” declared Barack Obama,all people are equal ,,people should be treated equally, regardless of who they are or who they love”.

It's a family affair
(It's a family affair)
It's a family affair
(It's a family affair)
Over there, over there

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 15175
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

After that the slope gets more slippery  “Love is love,” declared Barack Obama,all people are equal ,,people should be treated equally, regardless of who they are or who they love”.

It's a family affair
(It's a family affair)
It's a family affair
(It's a family affair)
Over there, over there




Great song 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 27139
Posted: #39
What weirdos are trying to use this to their advantage? What strange desires? No idea what you're talking about.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 58939
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:


hahahaha good one.

Sorry if you and SS are a bit depressed today, it will all be ok in the future..

Funny that a mod can compare someone who disagrees with him to Nazis and no issue.   all around.
22nd
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54481
Posted: #41

Good for them. Not sure why just because 2 people can have a baby means they are the only ones entitled to get married and/or have the benefits of being married.

 

I also dont understand why anyone hates g a y people. Its the way they were born. People that think other wise are simply foolish. The "nonstraight" community is also very peaceful and nice people. They arent out commiting crimes and killing people. Every single one Ive ever known or worked with was extremely nice.

 

Congrats to them.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #42

All what they have done is redefined marriage...arbitrarily..

Why stop there? Why not make it that marriage is recognised between 3,5 or 7 people?

Why not ALSO include mature consenting incest relationships?

Let the slippery slope begin.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 27139
Posted: #43
Typical perspective from a mind lost in religion.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54481
Posted: #44
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:

All what they have done is redefined marriage...arbitrarily..

Why stop there? Why not make it that marriage is recognised between 3,5 or 7 people?

Why not ALSO include mature consenting incest relationships?

Let the slippery slope begin.

Youre basing your opinion off of a fiction novel written thousands of years ago.


You can provide no substance on this matter. 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #45

Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:

Typical perspective from a mind lost in religion.

Because i dont agree with your subjective opinion?

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 27785
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

Youre basing your opinion off of a fiction novel written thousands of years ago.


You can provide no substance on this matter. 

Did you actually have a rebuttal?

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 5751
Posted: #47
This might be the slippery slope some of the previous posters were referring to.

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/02/montana-man-files-application-for-polygamous-marriage/

Collier says "We just want to add legal legitimacy to an already happy, loving family." He added "We're not asking for acceptance. We're just asking for tolerance."

Who am I to judge.
If three people love each other shouldn't they be allowed to do this?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 33785
Posted: #48
As President Obama claims... “Love is love”......

If,marriage is not limited by sex,why should it be limited by a number  ?...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 3387
Posted: #49
marriage is a scam, get ahead of the times.  that aweful tradition is worse than confederate flags and christmas. how does a signature and a lame ceremony make people love eachother more?. it doesnt. people arent to be trusted, always be ready to cut ties and walk away. 
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #50
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:

All what they have done is redefined marriage...arbitrarily..

Why stop there? Why not make it that marriage is recognised between 3,5 or 7 people?

Why not ALSO include mature consenting incest relationships?

Let the slippery slope begin.


Couldn't it be argued that marriage itself is a slippery slope? Man and woman don't need to be married to procreate. Why have marriage at all? 


All Forums | General Discussion
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.