He used his Nevada ML winnings to buy $300,000 worth of tickets?
He used his Nevada ML winnings to buy $300,000 worth of tickets?
Hurley's numbers from Lost were 4,8,15,16,23 and 42.
Last night was 4,8,15,25 and 47 ... with 42 being the Mega Ball number.
3 & the mega pays $150, $600 if you had the Megaplier (x4)
Hurley's numbers from Lost were 4,8,15,16,23 and 42.
Last night was 4,8,15,25 and 47 ... with 42 being the Mega Ball number.
3 & the mega pays $150, $600 if you had the Megaplier (x4)
The lump sum payout tends to equal about 30 percent on the total jackpot.. the annuity pays alot more in the long run but who knows with interest and investments what will happen? Prob better to take the annuity. It's not like you won't be able to do anything or buy anything you want either way
The lump sum payout tends to equal about 30 percent on the total jackpot.. the annuity pays alot more in the long run but who knows with interest and investments what will happen? Prob better to take the annuity. It's not like you won't be able to do anything or buy anything you want either way
The lump sum payout tends to equal about 30 percent on the total jackpot.. the annuity pays alot more in the long run but who knows with interest and investments what will happen? Prob better to take the annuity. It's not like you won't be able to do anything or buy anything you want either way
fuck that. if you don't think you could average a better return with your money over time than the annuity gets you in higher proceeds, then you are an idiot. take the lump sum and invest it soundly and you will DESTROY the "higher amount" you get through the annuity
The lump sum payout tends to equal about 30 percent on the total jackpot.. the annuity pays alot more in the long run but who knows with interest and investments what will happen? Prob better to take the annuity. It's not like you won't be able to do anything or buy anything you want either way
fuck that. if you don't think you could average a better return with your money over time than the annuity gets you in higher proceeds, then you are an idiot. take the lump sum and invest it soundly and you will DESTROY the "higher amount" you get through the annuity
I got $10 on it............
What I like, I play the "regular" Cal Lottery, and people go "I'm not going to play until it gets big".........................Yeah, like 7 mil wouldn't change your lifestyle.................
I never play til it gets big. The odds dont change, but the winnings do. I can bet $1 to win $7 mill, or $1 to win $355 mill .....I like the second much better....
I got $10 on it............
What I like, I play the "regular" Cal Lottery, and people go "I'm not going to play until it gets big".........................Yeah, like 7 mil wouldn't change your lifestyle.................
I never play til it gets big. The odds dont change, but the winnings do. I can bet $1 to win $7 mill, or $1 to win $355 mill .....I like the second much better....
LOL yeah it is that easy. Try explaining that to the IRS.
LOL yeah it is that easy. Try explaining that to the IRS.
fuck that. if you don't think you could average a better return with your money over time than the annuity gets you in higher proceeds, then you are an idiot. take the lump sum and invest it soundly and you will DESTROY the "higher amount" you get through the annuity
It really depends on how old you are. All of us I would agree. The rule of 72 would double our money every 9 years on a conservative basis or perhaps 7 if invested much more aggressively. I am 34 for if I won $100 mill based on the lump sum payout I could have $350 mill in 31.5 years just conservatively investing it. Now if I was say 78 I would have a very different answer.
fuck that. if you don't think you could average a better return with your money over time than the annuity gets you in higher proceeds, then you are an idiot. take the lump sum and invest it soundly and you will DESTROY the "higher amount" you get through the annuity
It really depends on how old you are. All of us I would agree. The rule of 72 would double our money every 9 years on a conservative basis or perhaps 7 if invested much more aggressively. I am 34 for if I won $100 mill based on the lump sum payout I could have $350 mill in 31.5 years just conservatively investing it. Now if I was say 78 I would have a very different answer.
It really depends on how old you are. All of us I would agree. The rule of 72 would double our money every 9 years on a conservative basis or perhaps 7 if invested much more aggressively. I am 34 for if I won $100 mill based on the lump sum payout I could have $350 mill in 31.5 years just conservatively investing it. Now if I was say 78 I would have a very different answer.
It really depends on how old you are. All of us I would agree. The rule of 72 would double our money every 9 years on a conservative basis or perhaps 7 if invested much more aggressively. I am 34 for if I won $100 mill based on the lump sum payout I could have $350 mill in 31.5 years just conservatively investing it. Now if I was say 78 I would have a very different answer.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.