You can't place a probability on things that have a 0% chance of happening. You can NEVER be Doc Rivers because you are not Doc Rivers. A dog will NEVER accidentally build a house because he doesn't have the physical capabilities of doing so. The probability is 0%.
The odds of the universe forming ONE PLANET that sustains life (at least one) over the course of trillions upon trillions of supernovas and even more trillions upon trillions of planets is incredibly high. 1 in 50,000....50 pages of 0s is almost 100% if there were 50,000....50 pages of 0s worth of explosions, which there were. So by your own logic, you acknowledge this.
Can you prove 100% FACT, GUARANTEED that i am not Doc Rivers? No ifs or buts, Prove 100% FACT that i am not Doc Rivers?
0
Quote Originally Posted by KittyKatz286:
You can't place a probability on things that have a 0% chance of happening. You can NEVER be Doc Rivers because you are not Doc Rivers. A dog will NEVER accidentally build a house because he doesn't have the physical capabilities of doing so. The probability is 0%.
The odds of the universe forming ONE PLANET that sustains life (at least one) over the course of trillions upon trillions of supernovas and even more trillions upon trillions of planets is incredibly high. 1 in 50,000....50 pages of 0s is almost 100% if there were 50,000....50 pages of 0s worth of explosions, which there were. So by your own logic, you acknowledge this.
Can you prove 100% FACT, GUARANTEED that i am not Doc Rivers? No ifs or buts, Prove 100% FACT that i am not Doc Rivers?
I am answered this. I see worship as a sign of LOVE and prayer for reinforcement to praise God and for him to forgive us for our sins. I dont see it as he demands this, but rather for humans to acknowledge him for creating us. After all, if it wasnt for him, there wouldnt be life...
0
Quote Originally Posted by SYSTEM:
I get the pattern...avoid the question
Again, WHY WOULD HE CARE IF WE WORSHIP HIM
I am answered this. I see worship as a sign of LOVE and prayer for reinforcement to praise God and for him to forgive us for our sins. I dont see it as he demands this, but rather for humans to acknowledge him for creating us. After all, if it wasnt for him, there wouldnt be life...
YOU ARE CLAIMING ANOTHER REALM EXISTS. You have less evidence than I do. How can you even begin to make a claim like that? I don't care about the properties of a supernatural realm. Read it: SUPERNATURAL (translation: not real). I know things in the NATURAL realm and I have no reason to think any other world exists. Applying rules to other worlds is a nonissue because you have NO BASIS for that world existing.
"In this physical realm that we live in (the realm where the atheist thinks it is the only realm and no other realms exist), SOMETHING CANNOT COME FROM NOTHING. Can it? Just answer it, yes or no? Do you realise how ridicolous you sound by thinking something can come from nothing?"
Right, because no rational human being should believe any other realms exist. What is this? Mortal Kombat?
Something cannot come from nothing... RIGHT, you are correct sir.
You think god came from nothing.
You are a hypocrite.
By that, u claiming something comes from nothing....
After all, u are saying the universe created itself out of nothing.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KittyKatz286:
YOU ARE CLAIMING ANOTHER REALM EXISTS. You have less evidence than I do. How can you even begin to make a claim like that? I don't care about the properties of a supernatural realm. Read it: SUPERNATURAL (translation: not real). I know things in the NATURAL realm and I have no reason to think any other world exists. Applying rules to other worlds is a nonissue because you have NO BASIS for that world existing.
"In this physical realm that we live in (the realm where the atheist thinks it is the only realm and no other realms exist), SOMETHING CANNOT COME FROM NOTHING. Can it? Just answer it, yes or no? Do you realise how ridicolous you sound by thinking something can come from nothing?"
Right, because no rational human being should believe any other realms exist. What is this? Mortal Kombat?
Something cannot come from nothing... RIGHT, you are correct sir.
You think god came from nothing.
You are a hypocrite.
By that, u claiming something comes from nothing....
After all, u are saying the universe created itself out of nothing.
1. No Rostos, I cannot, because I have never seen you. If I see you and you give me whatever information I ask for, then yes, I can prove 100% that you are NOT Doc Rivers.
2. You still didn't answer the question from System. You said why we worship god. You didn't answer why god would give a shit if we worship him or not.
0
1. No Rostos, I cannot, because I have never seen you. If I see you and you give me whatever information I ask for, then yes, I can prove 100% that you are NOT Doc Rivers.
2. You still didn't answer the question from System. You said why we worship god. You didn't answer why god would give a shit if we worship him or not.
I already addressed the something from nothing. My conclusion is that the universe always existed. I do not know how the universe came about. Something had to always be here. That is 100% TRUE. Whether it's the universe, the first atom, the multiverse, or god, SOMETHING WAS ALWAYS HERE. The best answer I have now is that which initiated the various explosions and all the chaos that caused the universe to be the way it is, that was always here. In truth, I don't know and won't pretend to know. It is a lot easier believing something tangible always existed than something intangible like god, that is all I'm saying.
You are saying god came from nothing. If he's real, that may be the case, but my point is simply this: Your argument is no different than mine, I'm just choosing to claim that something corporeal "always existed" rather than something supernatural.
0
I already addressed the something from nothing. My conclusion is that the universe always existed. I do not know how the universe came about. Something had to always be here. That is 100% TRUE. Whether it's the universe, the first atom, the multiverse, or god, SOMETHING WAS ALWAYS HERE. The best answer I have now is that which initiated the various explosions and all the chaos that caused the universe to be the way it is, that was always here. In truth, I don't know and won't pretend to know. It is a lot easier believing something tangible always existed than something intangible like god, that is all I'm saying.
You are saying god came from nothing. If he's real, that may be the case, but my point is simply this: Your argument is no different than mine, I'm just choosing to claim that something corporeal "always existed" rather than something supernatural.
Can you prove 100% FACT, GUARANTEED that i am not Doc Rivers? No ifs or buts, Prove 100% FACT that i am not Doc Rivers?
Actually you can prove for a fact that you are not Doc Rivers.. one of your 12721 has got to be at the time of one of the Celtics game.. that proves you are not.. besides Doc Rivers cant be on a betting forum or something like it.. its not approved by the league or team or both.. so yeah.. 100% you are not Doc Rivers
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
Can you prove 100% FACT, GUARANTEED that i am not Doc Rivers? No ifs or buts, Prove 100% FACT that i am not Doc Rivers?
Actually you can prove for a fact that you are not Doc Rivers.. one of your 12721 has got to be at the time of one of the Celtics game.. that proves you are not.. besides Doc Rivers cant be on a betting forum or something like it.. its not approved by the league or team or both.. so yeah.. 100% you are not Doc Rivers
1. No Rostos, I cannot, because I have never seen you. If I see you and you give me whatever information I ask for, then yes, I can prove 100% that you are NOT Doc Rivers.
2. You still didn't answer the question from System. You said why we worship god. You didn't answer why god would give a shit if we worship him or not.
1. That is not my question. My question is, right now , can you prove 100% FACT that i am not Doc Rivers? You dont know who i am, how are you gonna find out who i am? Yes, i registered, you can check with Covers and if they break there privacy rules, they will tell you who i am, BUT, is there a greater chance i lied in the registration or is there a greater chance that the earth happened by chance (10 pages of zeroes).
Now, based on that, can you prove 100% chance that i am NOT Doc Rivers based on the scenario we have?
2. As SJD said, worship is a sign of Love and adoration. The strongest form of love is worship. If you dont worship, then the love is anything less than 100%. I love my parents dearly but i dont worship them. I love God more than parents, therefore it gets into the category of worship, that is the stregnth of love.
You dont have to worship God if you dont want to, but if you dont, it is a sign that the love is less than 100%, based on that, he knows how much you love him. He doesnt demand it though.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KittyKatz286:
1. No Rostos, I cannot, because I have never seen you. If I see you and you give me whatever information I ask for, then yes, I can prove 100% that you are NOT Doc Rivers.
2. You still didn't answer the question from System. You said why we worship god. You didn't answer why god would give a shit if we worship him or not.
1. That is not my question. My question is, right now , can you prove 100% FACT that i am not Doc Rivers? You dont know who i am, how are you gonna find out who i am? Yes, i registered, you can check with Covers and if they break there privacy rules, they will tell you who i am, BUT, is there a greater chance i lied in the registration or is there a greater chance that the earth happened by chance (10 pages of zeroes).
Now, based on that, can you prove 100% chance that i am NOT Doc Rivers based on the scenario we have?
2. As SJD said, worship is a sign of Love and adoration. The strongest form of love is worship. If you dont worship, then the love is anything less than 100%. I love my parents dearly but i dont worship them. I love God more than parents, therefore it gets into the category of worship, that is the stregnth of love.
You dont have to worship God if you dont want to, but if you dont, it is a sign that the love is less than 100%, based on that, he knows how much you love him. He doesnt demand it though.
I already addressed the something from nothing. My conclusion is that the universe always existed. I do not know how the universe came about. Something had to always be here. That is 100% TRUE. Whether it's the universe, the first atom, the multiverse, or god, SOMETHING WAS ALWAYS HERE. The best answer I have now is that which initiated the various explosions and all the chaos that caused the universe to be the way it is, that was always here. In truth, I don't know and won't pretend to know. It is a lot easier believing something tangible always existed than something intangible like god, that is all I'm saying.
You are saying god came from nothing. If he's real, that may be the case, but my point is simply this: Your argument is no different than mine, I'm just choosing to claim that something corporeal "always existed" rather than something supernatural.
So you believe the universe always existed yet you believe in the big bang/
0
Quote Originally Posted by KittyKatz286:
I already addressed the something from nothing. My conclusion is that the universe always existed. I do not know how the universe came about. Something had to always be here. That is 100% TRUE. Whether it's the universe, the first atom, the multiverse, or god, SOMETHING WAS ALWAYS HERE. The best answer I have now is that which initiated the various explosions and all the chaos that caused the universe to be the way it is, that was always here. In truth, I don't know and won't pretend to know. It is a lot easier believing something tangible always existed than something intangible like god, that is all I'm saying.
You are saying god came from nothing. If he's real, that may be the case, but my point is simply this: Your argument is no different than mine, I'm just choosing to claim that something corporeal "always existed" rather than something supernatural.
So you believe the universe always existed yet you believe in the big bang/
Actually you can prove for a fact that you are not Doc Rivers.. one of your 12721 has got to be at the time of one of the Celtics game.. that proves you are not.. besides Doc Rivers cant be on a betting forum or something like it.. its not approved by the league or team or both.. so yeah.. 100% you are not Doc Rivers
Can you prove 100% fact that when i was on the sideline i didnt post something on my blackberry? 100% fact.
Furthermore, is there more of a chance of a pair of sixes being rolled 50,000 times in a row or me breaking a rule put out by the NBA?
0
Quote Originally Posted by bbitw:
Actually you can prove for a fact that you are not Doc Rivers.. one of your 12721 has got to be at the time of one of the Celtics game.. that proves you are not.. besides Doc Rivers cant be on a betting forum or something like it.. its not approved by the league or team or both.. so yeah.. 100% you are not Doc Rivers
Can you prove 100% fact that when i was on the sideline i didnt post something on my blackberry? 100% fact.
Furthermore, is there more of a chance of a pair of sixes being rolled 50,000 times in a row or me breaking a rule put out by the NBA?
1. Now you're saying god does NOT demand our worship. So why should I worship him? And if you love god more than your parents, that is absolutely despicable. Your parents created you, raised you, cared for you. What did god do? That's right. NOTHING. NOT A GOD DAMN THING (pun intended lol). How can you love something you've never seen more than your parents who did so much for you?
2. Clarifying. I believe whatever it was that caused the big bang "always existed."
0
1. Now you're saying god does NOT demand our worship. So why should I worship him? And if you love god more than your parents, that is absolutely despicable. Your parents created you, raised you, cared for you. What did god do? That's right. NOTHING. NOT A GOD DAMN THING (pun intended lol). How can you love something you've never seen more than your parents who did so much for you?
2. Clarifying. I believe whatever it was that caused the big bang "always existed."
1. Now you're saying god does NOT demand our worship. So why should I worship him? And if you love god more than your parents, that is absolutely despicable. Your parents created you, raised you, cared for you. What did god do? That's right. NOTHING. NOT A GOD DAMN THING (pun intended lol). How can you love something you've never seen more than your parents who did so much for you?
2. Clarifying. I believe whatever it was that caused the big bang "always existed."
1. Yes, my parents raised me and i love them, but God created everything, without my God, my parents wouldnt be around, therefore i wouldnt be around. So i love God more than i love my parents, the level of love is at a worship level. Again, God doesnt demand you worship him. You are free to choose whatever you want to do .
2. So the thing that caused the big bang always existed....mmm, who created the thing that always existed (remember, we are talking about this realm, are you saying the "thing popped out of nothing"?
0
Quote Originally Posted by KittyKatz286:
1. Now you're saying god does NOT demand our worship. So why should I worship him? And if you love god more than your parents, that is absolutely despicable. Your parents created you, raised you, cared for you. What did god do? That's right. NOTHING. NOT A GOD DAMN THING (pun intended lol). How can you love something you've never seen more than your parents who did so much for you?
2. Clarifying. I believe whatever it was that caused the big bang "always existed."
1. Yes, my parents raised me and i love them, but God created everything, without my God, my parents wouldnt be around, therefore i wouldnt be around. So i love God more than i love my parents, the level of love is at a worship level. Again, God doesnt demand you worship him. You are free to choose whatever you want to do .
2. So the thing that caused the big bang always existed....mmm, who created the thing that always existed (remember, we are talking about this realm, are you saying the "thing popped out of nothing"?
Something had to always exist. We agree on that. There is an infinite regress if we don't. We cannot comprehend the concept of infinite existence, without beginning or end, but that is not to say it's not possible. It is 100% a possibility and I find it more plausible than a god existing who has the same qualities of infinite existence, without beginning or end.
0
Something had to always exist. We agree on that. There is an infinite regress if we don't. We cannot comprehend the concept of infinite existence, without beginning or end, but that is not to say it's not possible. It is 100% a possibility and I find it more plausible than a god existing who has the same qualities of infinite existence, without beginning or end.
Something had to always exist. We agree on that. There is an infinite regress if we don't. We cannot comprehend the concept of infinite existence, without beginning or end, but that is not to say it's not possible. It is 100% a possibility and I find it more plausible than a god existing who has the same qualities of infinite existence, without beginning or end.
No, it is generally accepted in the scientific field that something did not always exist. The universe has a birthdate, prior to this birthdate, there was no space, time and matter.
There was nothing, nada, zeo, zilch, NOTHING.
No gases, no gravity, no nothing, yet something just popped out of nothing? That should be enough for you to believe that something outside of space, time and matter caused the explosion.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KittyKatz286:
Something had to always exist. We agree on that. There is an infinite regress if we don't. We cannot comprehend the concept of infinite existence, without beginning or end, but that is not to say it's not possible. It is 100% a possibility and I find it more plausible than a god existing who has the same qualities of infinite existence, without beginning or end.
No, it is generally accepted in the scientific field that something did not always exist. The universe has a birthdate, prior to this birthdate, there was no space, time and matter.
There was nothing, nada, zeo, zilch, NOTHING.
No gases, no gravity, no nothing, yet something just popped out of nothing? That should be enough for you to believe that something outside of space, time and matter caused the explosion.
1. That is not my question. My question is, right now , can you prove 100% FACT that i am not Doc Rivers? You dont know who i am, how are you gonna find out who i am? Yes, i registered, you can check with Covers and if they break there privacy rules, they will tell you who i am, BUT, is there a greater chance i lied in the registration or is there a greater chance that the earth happened by chance (10 pages of zeroes).
Now, based on that, can you prove 100% chance that i am NOT Doc Rivers based on the scenario we have?
2. As SJD said, worship is a sign of Love and adoration. The strongest form of love is worship. If you dont worship, then the love is anything less than 100%.
Do you actually believe the stuff you are making up, or are you just trying to fool yourself So you're saying if you don't worship god, you're not loving him enoughAnd you still haven't answered why he would even care.
I love my parents dearly but i dont worship them. I love God more than parents, therefore it gets into the category of worship, that is the stregnth of love.
You dont have to worship God if you dont want to, but if you dont, it is a sign that the love is less than 100%, based on that, he knows how much you love him. He doesnt demand it though.
4 “You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, 6 but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.
Sounds like a demand to me
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
1. That is not my question. My question is, right now , can you prove 100% FACT that i am not Doc Rivers? You dont know who i am, how are you gonna find out who i am? Yes, i registered, you can check with Covers and if they break there privacy rules, they will tell you who i am, BUT, is there a greater chance i lied in the registration or is there a greater chance that the earth happened by chance (10 pages of zeroes).
Now, based on that, can you prove 100% chance that i am NOT Doc Rivers based on the scenario we have?
2. As SJD said, worship is a sign of Love and adoration. The strongest form of love is worship. If you dont worship, then the love is anything less than 100%.
Do you actually believe the stuff you are making up, or are you just trying to fool yourself So you're saying if you don't worship god, you're not loving him enoughAnd you still haven't answered why he would even care.
I love my parents dearly but i dont worship them. I love God more than parents, therefore it gets into the category of worship, that is the stregnth of love.
You dont have to worship God if you dont want to, but if you dont, it is a sign that the love is less than 100%, based on that, he knows how much you love him. He doesnt demand it though.
4 “You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, 6 but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.
Atheists believe that all cause and effect in the universe has a naturalistic origin. Observational data lead us to the conclusion that the universe first began to exist 13.7 billion years ago. Since all things that begin to exist must have a cause, this means that the universe has a cause. However, a naturalistic cause for the origin of the universe cannot be confirmed observationally. Therefore, atheists believe the principle that all phenomena have a naturalistic cause based solely upon faith in naturalism.
0
Atheists believe that all cause and effect in the universe has a naturalistic origin. Observational data lead us to the conclusion that the universe first began to exist 13.7 billion years ago. Since all things that begin to exist must have a cause, this means that the universe has a cause. However, a naturalistic cause for the origin of the universe cannot be confirmed observationally. Therefore, atheists believe the principle that all phenomena have a naturalistic cause based solely upon faith in naturalism.
Beliefs have to be consistent with your world view. Before the 20th century, atheists assumed that the universe was eternal. However, beginning with Einstein's theory of general relativity and early observational evidence, it became apparent that the universe was expanding. Extrapolating back in time revealed that the universe was merely billions of years old. The data eventually led to the "Big Bang" theory, which is virtually universally accepted by modern day cosmologist. Attempt to get around the idea that the universe had a begining have all met with observational difficulties.The idea that the universe could have gone through an infinite number of births and deaths was shown to be false on the basis of the lack of amount of matter within the universe, and the fact that any collapse would have led to a "Big Crunch" instead of another Big Bang. So, we have come to realize that the universe 1st began to exist 13.7 billion years ago. Atheists are left with, since their worldview requires that all things that begin to exist must have a cause. So, logic requires the admission that the universe had a cause. Virtually all atheists say that this cause was some natural phenomenon. It is also possible that the cause of the universe was a supernatural intelligence i.e. God.
However, there is no direct observational evidence for either belief. Those who are strong atheists (convinced there is no god, the topic is hollow, but have continued to post across 25 pages) violate one of the main rules of atheism that all beliefs are based upon observational evidence. So, any atheist who denies the possible existence of God violates their own worldview.
0
Beliefs have to be consistent with your world view. Before the 20th century, atheists assumed that the universe was eternal. However, beginning with Einstein's theory of general relativity and early observational evidence, it became apparent that the universe was expanding. Extrapolating back in time revealed that the universe was merely billions of years old. The data eventually led to the "Big Bang" theory, which is virtually universally accepted by modern day cosmologist. Attempt to get around the idea that the universe had a begining have all met with observational difficulties.The idea that the universe could have gone through an infinite number of births and deaths was shown to be false on the basis of the lack of amount of matter within the universe, and the fact that any collapse would have led to a "Big Crunch" instead of another Big Bang. So, we have come to realize that the universe 1st began to exist 13.7 billion years ago. Atheists are left with, since their worldview requires that all things that begin to exist must have a cause. So, logic requires the admission that the universe had a cause. Virtually all atheists say that this cause was some natural phenomenon. It is also possible that the cause of the universe was a supernatural intelligence i.e. God.
However, there is no direct observational evidence for either belief. Those who are strong atheists (convinced there is no god, the topic is hollow, but have continued to post across 25 pages) violate one of the main rules of atheism that all beliefs are based upon observational evidence. So, any atheist who denies the possible existence of God violates their own worldview.
Apologies, left out the link which was to be inserted in the blank break in the 2nd last line of the above post which was to be occupied with *observational evidence.
Though for those interested in probability, research smallest unit of time (Planck time) and the lowest probability that could of occured in the universe. The physical laws of the universe fall within very narrow ranges in order for life (or even matter) to exist, suggesting some level of design. The prospect of finding a naturalistic cause for the origin of the universe is bleak at best, since the laws of physics indicate that we will never be able escape the bounds of our universe to even attempt to look for the cause of the universe.
Unlikely things happen all the time. This is the mantra of the anti-design movement in the last few pages. However, there is an absolute physical limit for improbable events to happen in our universe. Although it would be possible that one or two constants might require unusual fine-tuning by chance, it would be virtually impossible that all of them would require such fine-tuning. Some physicists have indicated that any of a number of different physical laws would be compatible with our present universe. However, it is not just the current state of the universe that must be compatible with the physical laws. Even more stringent are the initial conditions of the universe, since even minor deviations would have completely disrupted the process. For example, adding a grain of sand to the weight of the universe now would have no effect. However, adding even this small amount of weight at the beginning of the universe would have resulted in its collapse early in its history.
Even though many atheists would like to dismiss such evidence of design, cosmologists have made statements such as the following;
"This type of universe, however, seems to require a degree of fine-tuning of the initial conditions that is in apparent conflict with 'common wisdom"
"Polarization is predicted. It's been detected and it's in line with theoretical predictions. We're stuck with this preposterous universe"
0
Apologies, left out the link which was to be inserted in the blank break in the 2nd last line of the above post which was to be occupied with *observational evidence.
Though for those interested in probability, research smallest unit of time (Planck time) and the lowest probability that could of occured in the universe. The physical laws of the universe fall within very narrow ranges in order for life (or even matter) to exist, suggesting some level of design. The prospect of finding a naturalistic cause for the origin of the universe is bleak at best, since the laws of physics indicate that we will never be able escape the bounds of our universe to even attempt to look for the cause of the universe.
Unlikely things happen all the time. This is the mantra of the anti-design movement in the last few pages. However, there is an absolute physical limit for improbable events to happen in our universe. Although it would be possible that one or two constants might require unusual fine-tuning by chance, it would be virtually impossible that all of them would require such fine-tuning. Some physicists have indicated that any of a number of different physical laws would be compatible with our present universe. However, it is not just the current state of the universe that must be compatible with the physical laws. Even more stringent are the initial conditions of the universe, since even minor deviations would have completely disrupted the process. For example, adding a grain of sand to the weight of the universe now would have no effect. However, adding even this small amount of weight at the beginning of the universe would have resulted in its collapse early in its history.
Even though many atheists would like to dismiss such evidence of design, cosmologists have made statements such as the following;
"This type of universe, however, seems to require a degree of fine-tuning of the initial conditions that is in apparent conflict with 'common wisdom"
"Polarization is predicted. It's been detected and it's in line with theoretical predictions. We're stuck with this preposterous universe"
bbitw, one would have to be nieve to hold the scriptures at fault and not the cult that have manipulated the writings of the gospel to create another non-event like the june 6th, 2006 doomsday date.
Where does the bible endorse this false doomsday date for this weekend? The scriptures are specific in its order of events for prophecy to come. Where is the mark of the beast, the tribulations, anti-christs arrival, e.c.t that must pass before the second coming.
0
bbitw, one would have to be nieve to hold the scriptures at fault and not the cult that have manipulated the writings of the gospel to create another non-event like the june 6th, 2006 doomsday date.
Where does the bible endorse this false doomsday date for this weekend? The scriptures are specific in its order of events for prophecy to come. Where is the mark of the beast, the tribulations, anti-christs arrival, e.c.t that must pass before the second coming.
bbitw, one would have to be nieve to hold the scriptures at fault and not the cult that have manipulated the writings of the gospel to create another non-event like the june 6th, 2006 doomsday date.
Where does the bible endorse this false doomsday date for this weekend? The scriptures are specific in its order of events for prophecy to come. Where is the mark of the beast, the tribulations, anti-christs arrival, e.c.t that must pass before the second coming.
You didnt mentioned rationalism in your atheist guide or could say anything about the videos huh ?
0
Quote Originally Posted by aerial:
bbitw, one would have to be nieve to hold the scriptures at fault and not the cult that have manipulated the writings of the gospel to create another non-event like the june 6th, 2006 doomsday date.
Where does the bible endorse this false doomsday date for this weekend? The scriptures are specific in its order of events for prophecy to come. Where is the mark of the beast, the tribulations, anti-christs arrival, e.c.t that must pass before the second coming.
You didnt mentioned rationalism in your atheist guide or could say anything about the videos huh ?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
