All Forums | General Discussion

What could an unarmed USA do if their government became tyrannical?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2096
Posts: 46
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 706
Posted: #1
IF---all citizens of the United States of America----were unarmed of all guns, including bubble gum guns, and nerf guns------and the Government decided to become tyrannical like 1940 Germany's Government------what could the unarmed American Citizens do to stop a tyrannical government?



---Is the only answer pleading for mercy?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 1427
Posted: #2
nada, they have all the predators.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #3

If that were to happen pretty much the only thing they could do is the same thing tens of millions of civilians did in Europe and Asia after their governments implemented gun control.

Die.

https://sheikyermami.com/wp-content/uploads/gun-control-works-great-if-youre-the-one-who-controls-the-guns.jpg 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 1152
Posted: #4
I see your concern. However, the state is an abstract entity that lives only in the citizen's mind of that particular country. Those few poeple in the government have power because hundreds of thousands people enforce their laws (because they think they are subordinates and don't have powers themselves), while the rest of the population abide by them, either by consent, fear or just subserviency. The government, ufortunately, is just the embodiment of the majority of the people whom have given authorization for them to make laws for you. Do not forget 90% of the electorate supported Hitler in 1934.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 7587
Posted: #5
I would say that of all the issues with guns ,the majority of the problems are with illegal firearms in ther hands of the wrong people.darn, just drive by the streets in the hood in North or West Philly and youn hear pop-pop at any given time during ther day. A person with criminal intentions will mangwe to get a weapon regardless of govt banning.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 7587
Posted: #6
Not singling out bad neighborhoods but meant to basically say that a criminal from wherever will do what they want to do .
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 5827
Posted: #7
It'd be the end.  Straight up no chase.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 25164
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by BetCityOG:

I see your concern. However, the state is an abstract entity that lives only in the citizen's mind of that particular country. Those few poeple in the government have power because hundreds of thousands people enforce their laws (because they think they are subordinates and don't have powers themselves), while the rest of the population abide by them, either by consent, fear or just subserviency. The government, ufortunately, is just the embodiment of the majority of the people whom have given authorization for them to make laws for you. Do not forget 90% of the electorate supported Hitler in 1934.
spectacular vernacular 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 7065
Posted: #9
Fighting between executive, legislative and judicial branches are the REAL checks against tyranny and NOT overrated gun owners .  Abolishing Congress and Courts would have greater impacts than banning all guns.  Besides, no guarantee that a well armed population can stop tyranny.  For example, Iraq under Saddam.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #10

Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:

Fighting between executive, legislative and judicial branches are the REAL checks against tyranny and NOT overrated gun owners .  Abolishing Congress and Courts would have greater impacts than banning all guns.  Besides, no guarantee that a well armed population can stop tyranny.  For example, Iraq under Saddam.

Hmm, I think I’m going to have to side with the Founding Fathers on this one.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 5746
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:

Fighting between executive, legislative and judicial branches are the REAL checks against tyranny and NOT overrated gun owners .  Abolishing Congress and Courts would have greater impacts than banning all guns.  Besides, no guarantee that a well armed population can stop tyranny.  For example, Iraq under Saddam.

Something you are forgetting is most in the U.S. military are on the side of the gun owners, not the government.

Who would the U.S. govt use to enforce abolishment of the 2nd Amendment?

The Pro-2nd Amendment/Pro-Gun crowd have the fighter jets and tanks on their side.
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2003
Posts: 56611
Posted: #12
Lets take the wacky talk a step further..

So what happens if everyone in the country owns a military weapon that could potentially kill a thousand people in 5 minutes..

Then an asteroid hits the earth, what will happen to the people then? Will the guns protect us?

This tyranny argument is so tiring..just another media sound bite to get suckers in fear of the government and each other.

I can come up with another "what if" for fun if you like..


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 12821
Posted: #13

a few years ago i would have called the thought of my gov't detaining me without charges wacky as well

 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2003
Posts: 56611
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by captjohn67:

a few years ago i would have called the thought of my gov't detaining me without charges wacky as well



A wee bit different than detaining several hundred million folks I think.

Detaining without charges isnt new..been happening for centuries.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 5746
Posted: #15
In the last 100 years...

China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Soviet Union and the rest of the communist bloc (Romania/East Germany, etc), Cuba, Numerous African Countries.

These aren't hypothetical situations.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2005
Posts: 9261
Posted: #16

Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

Lets take the wacky talk a step further..

So what happens if everyone in the country owns a military weapon that could potentially kill a thousand people in 5 minutes..

Then an asteroid hits the earth, what will happen to the people then? Will the guns protect us?

This tyranny argument is so tiring..just another media sound bite to get suckers in fear of the government and each other.

I can come up with another "what if" for fun if you like..


Actually, the people who founded America wrote quite extensively on the topic of tyranny. The question is, why don't you believe in the ideas upon which America was founded?

Your "what if" is not only not responsive to the topic, it isn't tangentially related.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2005
Posts: 9261
Posted: #17

So what happens if everyone in the country gets "free" government sponsored healthcare..

Then an asteroid hits the earth, what will happen to the people then? Will the government healthcare protect us?

Logic. It is fun, isn't it?


 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2003
Posts: 56611
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:

Actually, the people who founded America wrote quite extensively on the topic of tyranny. The question is, why don't you believe in the ideas upon which America was founded?

Your "what if" is not only not responsive to the topic, it isn't tangentially related.



You and I have discussed this before.

The context in which you are liberally using regarding the founding fathers is severely misguided..(btw thats a nice way of saying what you do so bluntly and rudely).

The context came from their recent experience in a different country with different economic and geographic parameters.

Now if I had come from what they did at that time given those parameters then for sure I would probably think how they did.

If you want to go back to Europe and live there then sure you can talk tyranny all you want because it has much more validity (even though in reality what the government did to the early settlers wasnt even close to what you and the gun pals are insinuating).

So context is important, perspective and context..which was why I gave the phony asteroid example..it also lacks context and reality..which to me this entire phony gun grab scare tactic reeks of.


 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2003
Posts: 56611
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:

So what happens if everyone in the country gets "free" government sponsored healthcare..

Then an asteroid hits the earth, what will happen to the people then? Will the government healthcare protect us?

Logic. It is fun, isn't it?




You and deflection are good pals as usual.


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 706
Posted: #20
Wallstreetcappers: "So context is important, perspective and context..which was why I gave the phony asteroid example..it also lacks context and reality..which to me this entire phony gun grab scare tactic reeks of."


"Phony asteroid example...it also lacks context and reality"----

I agree----the chances of an asteroid hitting us lacks context and reality----
I don't agree----that an unarmed USA is not possible when it is in the "works" to be done by our government today.


In Egypt----a country with very strict gun laws-----they are protesting right now as I type this-----about the laws being created-----these laws do not represent what citizens of that country want------once the government started firing rifle shots, the crowds backed up-----


Asteroid hitting Earth?-----not likely soon
Unarmed USA hitting Earth?-------entering the atmosphere--will we stop it?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 706
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:

In the last 100 years...

China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Soviet Union and the rest of the communist bloc (Romania/East Germany, etc), Cuba, Numerous African Countries.

These aren't hypothetical situations.




yes---and this is AMERICA---the United States of America---who became the land of the free because of the laws the founding fathers created----why would we start treating gun policy like all the other countries?-----if I want to learn to master my free-throw shot, I'll watch Kobe and do as he does----if we want to learn how to master our gun shots, why are we watching and following Hitler's free-throw shot on the subject? 

Are we going to be end up protesting like Egypt when the government decides to ban our cell phones and communication means?  The government will shoot rifles and tear gas at us, and all we can do is make fireworks with bottles and get tired---until we go home and accept every law without the people's representation.

The countries that don't have the Land of the Free's 2nd amendment, should instill this law into their land-----


 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2003
Posts: 56611
Posted: #22
So Egypt is the same politically economically and geographically?

Thats news to me.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 3051
Posted: #23

Unarmed americans could do nothing but p i s s in the wind.

Never Make A Winner A Loser. Never.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2001
Posts: 85256
Posted: #24

and the Government decided to become tyrannical like 1940 Germany's Government

happened a lot earlier in germany than the 1940's. Hitler and the NAZI party gained control of the government in 1933 and actually reversed the Weimar Republic's 1928 gun control laws BUT in 1938 they passed restricions on person and other "noniaryans" owning firearms.

which, btw, was similar to laws in American southern states on minority gun ownership.which the NRA was all in favor of during that same time in history  

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 1427
Posted: #25
the founding fathers believed that their would be a revolution every 10 years after signing the constitution.
All Forums | General Discussion
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.