What a bunch of Big Babies you guys are. I made my newphew stop watching that crap when he was 7 because I told him that he was too old to watch that and its for little babies.
Jesus Effing Christ...............................................
What a bunch of Big Babies you guys are. I made my newphew stop watching that crap when he was 7 because I told him that he was too old to watch that and its for little babies.
Jesus Effing Christ...............................................
What a bunch of Big Babies you guys are. I made my newphew stop watching that crap when he was 7 because I told him that he was too old to watch that and its for little babies.
Jesus Effing Christ...............................................
What a bunch of Big Babies you guys are. I made my newphew stop watching that crap when he was 7 because I told him that he was too old to watch that and its for little babies.
Jesus Effing Christ...............................................
What a bunch of Big Babies you guys are. I made my newphew stop watching that crap when he was 7 because I told him that he was too old to watch that and its for little babies.
Jesus Effing Christ...............................................
What a bunch of Big Babies you guys are. I made my newphew stop watching that crap when he was 7 because I told him that he was too old to watch that and its for little babies.
Jesus Effing Christ...............................................
If anyone was going to win and defeat Undertaker at WrestleMania, it was going to be either Shawn Michaels or Triple H. In the last four WrestleMania's they both had two shots each at the dead man, and neither got the ultimate nod from Vince. That goes to show how RESPECTED the Undertaker is not just among the men in the locker room, but by those that make the ultimate decision on who wins and who loses.
For some reason I was under the impression that last WrestleMania was Undertakers last match, but I guess not.
Maybe one day his streak will end if he continues to wrestle, but I don't see him losing to Punk. The Urn, which are supposed to have Paul Bearer's ashes in them, are part of the story line here and the 'Taker wants them back.
Nice to see that Vince is starting to push the tag teams again. At least it seems that way over the last year anyway.
Only eight matches? Remember the day when they had 10 to 12 matches at WrestleMania and got them all in, in 2 1/2 hours or less?
Regardless of what title belt you hold, if you are not appearing at WrestleMania you have to feel some what slighted by those in charge of making the card. (I think that every year actually)
No women's match announced yet? To be honest, I'm glad. In general those match in my opinion are awful.
By the way, what happened with Batista. Did he leave the WWE for another promotion, or did he leave to make movies? I think having Mark Henry, Ryback, Brock Lesner, and Batista in a feud for months would make a good story line.
While I'm at it, no surprise the Vince McMahon "ECW" brand didn't survive. I thought it was a watered down version of the WWE and had no chance from the start after watching a couple of episodes when they first brought it back. In fact, that was actually McMahon's second attempt to revive ECW. With that said, will we ever see the McMahon's try and reboot the old WCW? I know it has been what, 10 years now at least since he bought the old WCW? I've always said that when McMahon treats both the ECW brand, and the WCW brand with the same amount of respect that he gives his WWE brand, then that is when those two brands would flourish under his thumb. To bad his ego keeps getting in the way. Would have been nice to of seen four hours of wrestling on Monday nights. Hour One could have been ECW. Hour Two could have been WCW. Then hour three and hour four could have been WWE. Heck he could have even broken new wrestlers in through ECW, promoted them to WCW after they hit a certain learning curve in the business and paid some initial dues. Then if the wrestler's credibility and his character was a draw, then he could have been promoted to the WWE. Plus wrestlers like Jericho who are aging but still trying to hang on, could be ("down sized") back into the WCW where they could breathe new life into a fading career when they have no chance of ever being a top title contender in the WWE again. Plus the McMahon's could have made up some legit pay scale, and the wrestlers would have made more money as they got promoted from one brand to the next. As for wrestlers like Jericho who have seen the peek of his career come and go, here is what I think the McMahon's could have done as far as the pay scale goes. Wrestlers like Jericho could of been paid more than the wrestler who was just promoted from the ECW brand, but less than what he was making when wrestling in the WWE brand. I think this idea would have served well in the case of some wrestlers like Wade Barrett and the 3MB group. I think those guys still have a lot to learn about wresting, talking to the camera, etc. In my opinion they are awful at times to watch. I'll even through in Cody Rhodes on that note because he can be awful to watch at times in my opinion, and he has been with the WWE now for at least five years.
As for John Cena vs The Rock, Cena wins no doubt. Rock makes way to much money doing movies to actually come back to the WWE full time. After WrestleMania, I doubt we see much of the Rock.
If anyone was going to win and defeat Undertaker at WrestleMania, it was going to be either Shawn Michaels or Triple H. In the last four WrestleMania's they both had two shots each at the dead man, and neither got the ultimate nod from Vince. That goes to show how RESPECTED the Undertaker is not just among the men in the locker room, but by those that make the ultimate decision on who wins and who loses.
For some reason I was under the impression that last WrestleMania was Undertakers last match, but I guess not.
Maybe one day his streak will end if he continues to wrestle, but I don't see him losing to Punk. The Urn, which are supposed to have Paul Bearer's ashes in them, are part of the story line here and the 'Taker wants them back.
Nice to see that Vince is starting to push the tag teams again. At least it seems that way over the last year anyway.
Only eight matches? Remember the day when they had 10 to 12 matches at WrestleMania and got them all in, in 2 1/2 hours or less?
Regardless of what title belt you hold, if you are not appearing at WrestleMania you have to feel some what slighted by those in charge of making the card. (I think that every year actually)
No women's match announced yet? To be honest, I'm glad. In general those match in my opinion are awful.
By the way, what happened with Batista. Did he leave the WWE for another promotion, or did he leave to make movies? I think having Mark Henry, Ryback, Brock Lesner, and Batista in a feud for months would make a good story line.
While I'm at it, no surprise the Vince McMahon "ECW" brand didn't survive. I thought it was a watered down version of the WWE and had no chance from the start after watching a couple of episodes when they first brought it back. In fact, that was actually McMahon's second attempt to revive ECW. With that said, will we ever see the McMahon's try and reboot the old WCW? I know it has been what, 10 years now at least since he bought the old WCW? I've always said that when McMahon treats both the ECW brand, and the WCW brand with the same amount of respect that he gives his WWE brand, then that is when those two brands would flourish under his thumb. To bad his ego keeps getting in the way. Would have been nice to of seen four hours of wrestling on Monday nights. Hour One could have been ECW. Hour Two could have been WCW. Then hour three and hour four could have been WWE. Heck he could have even broken new wrestlers in through ECW, promoted them to WCW after they hit a certain learning curve in the business and paid some initial dues. Then if the wrestler's credibility and his character was a draw, then he could have been promoted to the WWE. Plus wrestlers like Jericho who are aging but still trying to hang on, could be ("down sized") back into the WCW where they could breathe new life into a fading career when they have no chance of ever being a top title contender in the WWE again. Plus the McMahon's could have made up some legit pay scale, and the wrestlers would have made more money as they got promoted from one brand to the next. As for wrestlers like Jericho who have seen the peek of his career come and go, here is what I think the McMahon's could have done as far as the pay scale goes. Wrestlers like Jericho could of been paid more than the wrestler who was just promoted from the ECW brand, but less than what he was making when wrestling in the WWE brand. I think this idea would have served well in the case of some wrestlers like Wade Barrett and the 3MB group. I think those guys still have a lot to learn about wresting, talking to the camera, etc. In my opinion they are awful at times to watch. I'll even through in Cody Rhodes on that note because he can be awful to watch at times in my opinion, and he has been with the WWE now for at least five years.
As for John Cena vs The Rock, Cena wins no doubt. Rock makes way to much money doing movies to actually come back to the WWE full time. After WrestleMania, I doubt we see much of the Rock.
What a bunch of Big Babies you guys are. I made my newphew stop watching that crap when he was 7 because I told him that he was too old to watch that and its for little babies.
Jesus Effing Christ...............................................
What a bunch of Big Babies you guys are. I made my newphew stop watching that crap when he was 7 because I told him that he was too old to watch that and its for little babies.
Jesus Effing Christ...............................................
no no your saying it all wrong
FANNNNN DANNNN GOOOOOOO
no no your saying it all wrong
FANNNNN DANNNN GOOOOOOO
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.