• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 8
      NFL Week 8
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Panthers-Packers Picks
      • Survivor Picks
      • NFL Week 8 Odds
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Investments

    time to nibble at the FAZ?

    12 Next Last»
    LeRinkRat
    be easy
    wallstreetcappers
    Vermeer
    theclaw
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 2207
    Posts: 48
    12 Next Last»
     
    LeRinkRat
    LeRinkRat
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2001
    Posts: 85256
    Posted: Mar. 5, 2010 - 3:09 PM ET #1

    FAZ making new 12 month lows below $16 (current 15.83 - 1.03).

    all you need is for the ChiComs to say "no soup for you" OR the govenment to get seroius with these financial crooks and it will be back above $20 faster than you can say Henry (Pat) Paulson or B S Bernanke

    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.

    FAZ making new 12 month lows below $16 (current 15.83 - 1.03).

    all you need is for the ChiComs to say "no soup for you" OR the govenment to get seroius with these financial crooks and it will be back above $20 faster than you can say Henry (Pat) Paulson or B S Bernanke

     
    be easy
    be easy
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 15433
    Posted: Mar. 5, 2010 - 5:04 PM ET #2

    whatever happened with the one guy that posted his system to try and survive the time decay on this FAZ Submit
    Reply
    whatever happened with the one guy that posted his system to try and survive the time decay on this FAZ Submit
     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58440
    Posted: Mar. 5, 2010 - 5:23 PM ET #3

    I own plenty of it and will keep adding.



    The market is being obviously manipulated, up every single day lately in the face of 10% unemployment and dwindling credit.
    Reply
    I own plenty of it and will keep adding.



    The market is being obviously manipulated, up every single day lately in the face of 10% unemployment and dwindling credit.
     
    Vermeer
    Vermeer
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 2910
    Posted: Mar. 5, 2010 - 6:48 PM ET #4


      I agree that the market is being manipulated and for that reason would say that it is a dangerous game to bet against their interference.

     

    Reply

      I agree that the market is being manipulated and for that reason would say that it is a dangerous game to bet against their interference.

     

     
    Vermeer
    Vermeer
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 2910
    Posted: Mar. 5, 2010 - 8:15 PM ET #5

    Gotta love the brilliance that is Barney Fwank.... unreal...

    https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aqV2oVx5hc8A
    Reply
    Gotta love the brilliance that is Barney Fwank.... unreal...

    https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aqV2oVx5hc8A
     
    theclaw
    theclaw
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 12249
    Posted: Mar. 6, 2010 - 8:43 AM ET #6

    I can't believe you guys "still" are buying faz ??/#$??

    The banking sector just reported "blowout" earnings, what the hell are you looking at ??/#$??

    Fidelity, which is know for it's excellent research department has just given the banking sector 2 thumbs up as a excellent sector to invest this year.

    THE PRICE TO EARNINGS RATIO OF THE S&P 500 CONTINUE'S TO DROP, INDICATING EARNINGS ARE RISING FASTER THAN THE OVERALL MARKET !!!!

    Things that are present in up markets throughout history are present right here and now in this market, what are you looking at ??

    Yea, we're going up from here !!!!!!

    The market has gone up throughout history with unemployment above todays level, oh yea it's true, and another reason "YOU MUST DO YOUR HOMEWORK" !!!

     

    Reply

    I can't believe you guys "still" are buying faz ??/#$??

    The banking sector just reported "blowout" earnings, what the hell are you looking at ??/#$??

    Fidelity, which is know for it's excellent research department has just given the banking sector 2 thumbs up as a excellent sector to invest this year.

    THE PRICE TO EARNINGS RATIO OF THE S&P 500 CONTINUE'S TO DROP, INDICATING EARNINGS ARE RISING FASTER THAN THE OVERALL MARKET !!!!

    Things that are present in up markets throughout history are present right here and now in this market, what are you looking at ??

    Yea, we're going up from here !!!!!!

    The market has gone up throughout history with unemployment above todays level, oh yea it's true, and another reason "YOU MUST DO YOUR HOMEWORK" !!!

     

     
    Vermeer
    Vermeer
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 2910
    Posted: Mar. 6, 2010 - 10:03 AM ET #7

    Fidelity is more known for pumping and dumping their retail customers...show me where and when they called the crash...just paste it here...


    What were they flogging back in 2005? Warning you out of the market? Let's see it, seriously...



    Reply
    Fidelity is more known for pumping and dumping their retail customers...show me where and when they called the crash...just paste it here...


    What were they flogging back in 2005? Warning you out of the market? Let's see it, seriously...



     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58440
    Posted: Mar. 6, 2010 - 10:48 AM ET #8

    theclaw,

    Check out the market caps for these banks, dont focus on PPS alone.

    Most of these banks are trading at higher multiples than they were prior to the crash.

    BAC was floating between 40 and 50 per share for 4 years, now look at the share count for the last three years-

    link

    They have preferred shares which are paying out a high dividend to the tune of half the common count. Long term debt up 50% from three years ago, cash and investments are in bad shape, liabilities are way up.

    If you factor in the warrants sold recently, the share count has almost doubled-

    link

    So does BAC or other banks deserve 2008 valuation based on their current earnings?

    Goldman is near the upper range of their 5 year trading history, they sold shares and have increased their float by about 20%.

    Banks are holding their balance sheets together with cheap money and their interest expense on those liabilities and borrowed investments are artificially low, that wont last forever.

    I think banks are fairly valued right here based on a FULL recovery, they are priced at 3 year horizons right now with zero issues or possibility for a double dip.


    Reply
    theclaw,

    Check out the market caps for these banks, dont focus on PPS alone.

    Most of these banks are trading at higher multiples than they were prior to the crash.

    BAC was floating between 40 and 50 per share for 4 years, now look at the share count for the last three years-

    link

    They have preferred shares which are paying out a high dividend to the tune of half the common count. Long term debt up 50% from three years ago, cash and investments are in bad shape, liabilities are way up.

    If you factor in the warrants sold recently, the share count has almost doubled-

    link

    So does BAC or other banks deserve 2008 valuation based on their current earnings?

    Goldman is near the upper range of their 5 year trading history, they sold shares and have increased their float by about 20%.

    Banks are holding their balance sheets together with cheap money and their interest expense on those liabilities and borrowed investments are artificially low, that wont last forever.

    I think banks are fairly valued right here based on a FULL recovery, they are priced at 3 year horizons right now with zero issues or possibility for a double dip.


     
    LeRinkRat
    LeRinkRat
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2001
    Posts: 85256
    Posted: Mar. 6, 2010 - 2:39 PM ET #9

    I just think the financials have gotten ahead of themselves. still a lot of "smoke and mirrors" esp in the likes of GS and AIG.

    and btw, I'm not only one thinking this way.....

    Bank stocks climb from abyss, find footing fragile

    ref: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/bank-stocks-climb-from-abyss-find-footing-fragile-2010-03-05

     

    Reply

    I just think the financials have gotten ahead of themselves. still a lot of "smoke and mirrors" esp in the likes of GS and AIG.

    and btw, I'm not only one thinking this way.....

    Bank stocks climb from abyss, find footing fragile

    ref: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/bank-stocks-climb-from-abyss-find-footing-fragile-2010-03-05

     

     
    Vermeer
    Vermeer
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 2910
    Posted: Mar. 6, 2010 - 9:59 PM ET #10

    my problem is although I agree, i think the bank stocks are as manipulated as you can get and not have everyone break down in laughter..which almost happened to a few aghast panel members trying to swallow mirth as Vikram Pandit was assuring everyone they did not benefit in borrowing costs from the perception they were completely back stopped by the US Treasury.He repeatedly maintained that nonsense......
     in sum, i do not think you can apply normal balance sheet standards and stock appraisal techniques to these entities.They are as full of shit as a christmas turkey...
    Reply
    my problem is although I agree, i think the bank stocks are as manipulated as you can get and not have everyone break down in laughter..which almost happened to a few aghast panel members trying to swallow mirth as Vikram Pandit was assuring everyone they did not benefit in borrowing costs from the perception they were completely back stopped by the US Treasury.He repeatedly maintained that nonsense......
     in sum, i do not think you can apply normal balance sheet standards and stock appraisal techniques to these entities.They are as full of shit as a christmas turkey...
     
    Vermeer
    Vermeer
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 2910
    Posted: Mar. 6, 2010 - 10:38 PM ET #11

    PS

    I think of the lot of them as I do Social Security, as simply a government sponsored Ponzi scheme, or US Enron...etc etc....the fraud is on such an enormous scale, I can't credit any numbers coming from the recipients. 

     "Every election is sort of advanced auction of stolen goods." H.L. Mencken


    Reply
    PS

    I think of the lot of them as I do Social Security, as simply a government sponsored Ponzi scheme, or US Enron...etc etc....the fraud is on such an enormous scale, I can't credit any numbers coming from the recipients. 

     "Every election is sort of advanced auction of stolen goods." H.L. Mencken


     
    LeRinkRat
    LeRinkRat
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2001
    Posts: 85256
    Posted: Mar. 7, 2010 - 12:08 PM ET #12

     "Every election is sort of advanced auction of stolen goods." H.L. Mencken

    THAT'S a "three roller" (and oh so true)

    Reply

     "Every election is sort of advanced auction of stolen goods." H.L. Mencken

    THAT'S a "three roller" (and oh so true)

     
    Vermeer
    Vermeer
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 2910
    Posted: Mar. 8, 2010 - 3:04 PM ET #13

    Mencken was a real hoot at times, but I think he borrowed and reconfigured an early Nietzsche quote for that one, and oddly for Mencken made it a bit less harsh:

    everything the state says is a lie and everything it gets is stolen



    Reply
    Mencken was a real hoot at times, but I think he borrowed and reconfigured an early Nietzsche quote for that one, and oddly for Mencken made it a bit less harsh:

    everything the state says is a lie and everything it gets is stolen



     
    Vermeer
    Vermeer
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 2910
    Posted: Mar. 8, 2010 - 3:07 PM ET #14

    PS why I cannot contemplate acting on the basis of bank reporting, etc ....

    On several over occasions in the past I have written about the (bankrupt) FDIC taking over insolvent banks on Friday afternoon's.  This past Friday was no different.  In addition to the so-called great job (loss) data, three more banks were taken over by the (bankrupt) FDIC.  The reason why I bring this up is because, like before, these banks LIED to its regulators, depositors, and investors...with the approval of Congress.  Remember, in order to kick the can down the road, Congress forced FASB to change accounting from real (mark-to-market) to make-it-up-as-you-go-along accounting.


    As I have written before, these banks are marking UP their real estate portfolios to roughly no loss.  In the make believe world of make-it-up-as-you-go-along accounting, banking execs are legally allowed to mark the portfolio to what they believe the homes will be worth in the future and if they don't go broke in the interim, then the swindle will have worked.


    Karl Denninger goes over this, some of which is below.  The whole piece is worth a read at https://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/2049-All-You-Need-To-Know-About-Bank-Balance-Sheet-Fraud.html


    I am simply going to take last night's bank closures, which numbered four.  One of them has no "deposit insurance fund" estimated loss available, because they didn't find someone to take the assets - they're just mailing checks.  But the other three do.

       * Waterford Bank, Germantown MD: $155.6 million in assets, $156.4 in insured deposits.  They were "underwater" by $800,000, right?  Wrong:  Estimated loss, $51 million.  That is, the assets of $155.6 million were overvalued by approximately 30% at the time of seizure.

       * Bank of Illinois, Normal IL: $211.7 million in assets, $198.5 million in deposits.  They were "underwater" by $13.2 million (which is why they were seized), right?  Wrong: Estimated loss $53.7 million.  That is, the the assets of $211.7 million were overvalued by more than 25% at the time of seizure.

       * Sun American Bank, Boca Raton FL:  $535.7 million in assets (so they claimed anyway), $443.5 million in total deposits.  Heh, why did you seize them - they have more assets than liabilities?  Oh wait: Estimated loss: $103.8 million, so the actual assets are worth $443.5 - $103.8, or $339.7 million.  That is, the assets of $535.7 million were overvalued by a whopping 37% at the time of seizure.


    This isn't new, by the way.  In August of 2009 I went through Colonial Bank's failure based on BB&T's presentation to its shareholders on the "merger" - and gift it was given by the FDIC.  It too showed that Colonial had been carrying assets on their books at a ridiculous 37% above where BB&T ultimately marked them as a whole.


    Folks, your bank is being assessed deposit insurance premiums to pay for these losses.  You are paying these losses through increased fees and interest expense on your credit cards and all other manner of borrowing.


    You are paying for outrageous, pernicious and endemic balance sheet fraud.
    There is no conspiracy.  It is right under your nose.  One of these three banks, based on their balance sheet, wasn't even underwater - it was "to the good" by nearly $100 million dollars.

    The balance sheet was a flat, bald-faced lie.
    Reply
    PS why I cannot contemplate acting on the basis of bank reporting, etc ....

    On several over occasions in the past I have written about the (bankrupt) FDIC taking over insolvent banks on Friday afternoon's.  This past Friday was no different.  In addition to the so-called great job (loss) data, three more banks were taken over by the (bankrupt) FDIC.  The reason why I bring this up is because, like before, these banks LIED to its regulators, depositors, and investors...with the approval of Congress.  Remember, in order to kick the can down the road, Congress forced FASB to change accounting from real (mark-to-market) to make-it-up-as-you-go-along accounting.


    As I have written before, these banks are marking UP their real estate portfolios to roughly no loss.  In the make believe world of make-it-up-as-you-go-along accounting, banking execs are legally allowed to mark the portfolio to what they believe the homes will be worth in the future and if they don't go broke in the interim, then the swindle will have worked.


    Karl Denninger goes over this, some of which is below.  The whole piece is worth a read at https://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/2049-All-You-Need-To-Know-About-Bank-Balance-Sheet-Fraud.html


    I am simply going to take last night's bank closures, which numbered four.  One of them has no "deposit insurance fund" estimated loss available, because they didn't find someone to take the assets - they're just mailing checks.  But the other three do.

       * Waterford Bank, Germantown MD: $155.6 million in assets, $156.4 in insured deposits.  They were "underwater" by $800,000, right?  Wrong:  Estimated loss, $51 million.  That is, the assets of $155.6 million were overvalued by approximately 30% at the time of seizure.

       * Bank of Illinois, Normal IL: $211.7 million in assets, $198.5 million in deposits.  They were "underwater" by $13.2 million (which is why they were seized), right?  Wrong: Estimated loss $53.7 million.  That is, the the assets of $211.7 million were overvalued by more than 25% at the time of seizure.

       * Sun American Bank, Boca Raton FL:  $535.7 million in assets (so they claimed anyway), $443.5 million in total deposits.  Heh, why did you seize them - they have more assets than liabilities?  Oh wait: Estimated loss: $103.8 million, so the actual assets are worth $443.5 - $103.8, or $339.7 million.  That is, the assets of $535.7 million were overvalued by a whopping 37% at the time of seizure.


    This isn't new, by the way.  In August of 2009 I went through Colonial Bank's failure based on BB&T's presentation to its shareholders on the "merger" - and gift it was given by the FDIC.  It too showed that Colonial had been carrying assets on their books at a ridiculous 37% above where BB&T ultimately marked them as a whole.


    Folks, your bank is being assessed deposit insurance premiums to pay for these losses.  You are paying these losses through increased fees and interest expense on your credit cards and all other manner of borrowing.


    You are paying for outrageous, pernicious and endemic balance sheet fraud.
    There is no conspiracy.  It is right under your nose.  One of these three banks, based on their balance sheet, wasn't even underwater - it was "to the good" by nearly $100 million dollars.

    The balance sheet was a flat, bald-faced lie.
     
    Vermeer
    Vermeer
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 2910
    Posted: Mar. 8, 2010 - 3:12 PM ET #15

    and more from the economic genius that is barney fwank....

    Full Barney Frank letter:

    Mr. Brian Moynihan
    Bank of America

    Mr. Vikram Pandit
    Citigroup

    Mr. James Dimon
    JP Morgan Chase

    Mr. John Stumpf
    Wells Fargo


    Dear Messrs. Moynihan, Pandit, Dimon and Stumpf:

    The mortgage foreclosure crisis that began over two years ago, and which continues to be a prime contributor to our nation's current economic downturn, burdens millions of hard-working American families. Congress and the Obama Administration have worked hard to address foreclosures by enabling and encouraging loan modification s, but the private sector's response has fallen far short of the need. Many homeowners are eager to save their homes despite being "underwater," but find that lenders and servicers are unable or unwilling to make necessary modifications. These homeowners are increasingly deciding to walk away and thus foreclosures continue to mount, deepening the crisis. 

    To save homes on a large scale, we must move past temporary modifications in interest rates or terms and focus on permanent principal reductions that result in truly sustainable mortgages. There is no more important priority for me in our efforts to restore stability to our mortgage market. 

    Many investors in first-lien mortgages have indicated that they are willing to accept the fact of significant losses on those investments in order to move on and use their money for other purposes, rather than having it locked in underwater mortgages with a high and growing likelihood of foreclosure. With the interests of homeowners and investors aligned in this way, it should follow that large numbers of principal-reduction modifications could be made relatively quickly. That is not happening. According to investors, Administration officials, and other experts I have consulted, holders of second-lien mortgages are now a principal obstacle to many modifications. The problem of second-lien mortgages standing in the way of successful principal reduction modifications has reached a critical stage and requires immediate 
    attention from your institutions. 

    Large numbers of these second liens have no real economic value - the first liens are well underwater, and the prospect for any real return on the seconds is negligible. Yet because accounting rules allow holders of these seconds to carry the loans at artificially high values, many refuse to acknowledge the losses and write down the loans, which would allow willing first lien holders to reduce principal and keep 
    borrowers in their homes. 

    The four organizations you lead are major participants in the second-lien market. Failure to modify these debts has become a major and unnecessary obstacle to thousands of Americans being able to stay in their homes. I urge you in the strongest possible terms to take immediate steps to write down these second mortgages and allow principal reduction modifications of the underlying first liens to take place. If there are legal obstacles to your doing so, we will work with you to remove them. 

    I will be calling you within the week to discuss what your institutions plan to do to remove the second liens you own or control as impediments to principal reduction modifications.

    Reply
    and more from the economic genius that is barney fwank....

    Full Barney Frank letter:

    Mr. Brian Moynihan
    Bank of America

    Mr. Vikram Pandit
    Citigroup

    Mr. James Dimon
    JP Morgan Chase

    Mr. John Stumpf
    Wells Fargo


    Dear Messrs. Moynihan, Pandit, Dimon and Stumpf:

    The mortgage foreclosure crisis that began over two years ago, and which continues to be a prime contributor to our nation's current economic downturn, burdens millions of hard-working American families. Congress and the Obama Administration have worked hard to address foreclosures by enabling and encouraging loan modification s, but the private sector's response has fallen far short of the need. Many homeowners are eager to save their homes despite being "underwater," but find that lenders and servicers are unable or unwilling to make necessary modifications. These homeowners are increasingly deciding to walk away and thus foreclosures continue to mount, deepening the crisis. 

    To save homes on a large scale, we must move past temporary modifications in interest rates or terms and focus on permanent principal reductions that result in truly sustainable mortgages. There is no more important priority for me in our efforts to restore stability to our mortgage market. 

    Many investors in first-lien mortgages have indicated that they are willing to accept the fact of significant losses on those investments in order to move on and use their money for other purposes, rather than having it locked in underwater mortgages with a high and growing likelihood of foreclosure. With the interests of homeowners and investors aligned in this way, it should follow that large numbers of principal-reduction modifications could be made relatively quickly. That is not happening. According to investors, Administration officials, and other experts I have consulted, holders of second-lien mortgages are now a principal obstacle to many modifications. The problem of second-lien mortgages standing in the way of successful principal reduction modifications has reached a critical stage and requires immediate 
    attention from your institutions. 

    Large numbers of these second liens have no real economic value - the first liens are well underwater, and the prospect for any real return on the seconds is negligible. Yet because accounting rules allow holders of these seconds to carry the loans at artificially high values, many refuse to acknowledge the losses and write down the loans, which would allow willing first lien holders to reduce principal and keep 
    borrowers in their homes. 

    The four organizations you lead are major participants in the second-lien market. Failure to modify these debts has become a major and unnecessary obstacle to thousands of Americans being able to stay in their homes. I urge you in the strongest possible terms to take immediate steps to write down these second mortgages and allow principal reduction modifications of the underlying first liens to take place. If there are legal obstacles to your doing so, we will work with you to remove them. 

    I will be calling you within the week to discuss what your institutions plan to do to remove the second liens you own or control as impediments to principal reduction modifications.

     
    rick3117
    rick3117
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2006
    Posts: 14715
    Posted: Mar. 8, 2010 - 8:52 PM ET #16

    Unweel 
    Reply
    Unweel 
     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58440
    Posted: Mar. 8, 2010 - 9:29 PM ET #17

    Vermeer,

    Unfortunately at the time they changed FASB rules in the near term (it wont be permanent for sure) the swift collapse of the mortgage market for securities made it illiquid and the spreads were a mile wide..old FASB rule would be to market the asset at the BID or the buyer ready to buy price..with an illiquid market that wasnt representive of fair value, rather it was a sellers market with no buyers in sight and the FASB rule of mark to market assumes a reasonable market, liquid and spreads normal for market conditions.

    I think it is probably time to consider changing back, but I have to agree with the decision when they made it..these stupid moronic banks were getting margin calls every single day due to the knife falling markets and the irrational spreads on those assets.
    Reply
    Vermeer,

    Unfortunately at the time they changed FASB rules in the near term (it wont be permanent for sure) the swift collapse of the mortgage market for securities made it illiquid and the spreads were a mile wide..old FASB rule would be to market the asset at the BID or the buyer ready to buy price..with an illiquid market that wasnt representive of fair value, rather it was a sellers market with no buyers in sight and the FASB rule of mark to market assumes a reasonable market, liquid and spreads normal for market conditions.

    I think it is probably time to consider changing back, but I have to agree with the decision when they made it..these stupid moronic banks were getting margin calls every single day due to the knife falling markets and the irrational spreads on those assets.
     
    Vermeer
    Vermeer
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 2910
    Posted: Mar. 8, 2010 - 10:00 PM ET #18

    wall

    with you as far as it goes, and understand the panic filled circumstances that initiated the changes...but at some point there will have to be a real admission of toxic waste of those "assets" 

    estimating things on the basis of what some entity "believes" the assets will be worth at some point in the future makes me queasy to say the least... and just makes me stay away from the sector, as i simply don't believe what they are reporting (or rather, have no way of really knowing). Wild times to be sure...unfortunately, i think they are going to get even wilder.

     



    Reply
    wall

    with you as far as it goes, and understand the panic filled circumstances that initiated the changes...but at some point there will have to be a real admission of toxic waste of those "assets" 

    estimating things on the basis of what some entity "believes" the assets will be worth at some point in the future makes me queasy to say the least... and just makes me stay away from the sector, as i simply don't believe what they are reporting (or rather, have no way of really knowing). Wild times to be sure...unfortunately, i think they are going to get even wilder.

     



     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58440
    Posted: Mar. 9, 2010 - 10:39 AM ET #19

    More of the same today..this market refuses to go down.

    In the last three weeks there have been three down days with only one being more than a small fractional drop.

    13 up and 3 down..they are really trying to push the market up up up.
    Reply
    More of the same today..this market refuses to go down.

    In the last three weeks there have been three down days with only one being more than a small fractional drop.

    13 up and 3 down..they are really trying to push the market up up up.
     
    LeRinkRat
    LeRinkRat
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2001
    Posts: 85256
    Posted: Mar. 10, 2010 - 2:27 PM ET #20

    FAZ down below $15 wednesday march 10th with an interday and 12 month low of 14.78 (so far). C with an interday high over $4. IF they can get THAT dog to run, then it's death for the FAZ
    Reply
    FAZ down below $15 wednesday march 10th with an interday and 12 month low of 14.78 (so far). C with an interday high over $4. IF they can get THAT dog to run, then it's death for the FAZ
     
    Vermeer
    Vermeer
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 2910
    Posted: Mar. 10, 2010 - 3:08 PM ET #21

    Lotta heavy hedgies taking big positions in C...makes sense to me, in that if the Fed is determined it needs that to be at price X, that is where it will eventually be.

    Even Vikram can make money with that backing....0% money, sure no problem...how do you lose money with that????
    Reply
    Lotta heavy hedgies taking big positions in C...makes sense to me, in that if the Fed is determined it needs that to be at price X, that is where it will eventually be.

    Even Vikram can make money with that backing....0% money, sure no problem...how do you lose money with that????
     
    LeRinkRat
    LeRinkRat
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2001
    Posts: 85256
    Posted: Mar. 16, 2010 - 3:22 PM ET #22

    C over $4 (4.05). FAZ basc testing recent lows around $14.25 (14.23 interday)

     

    Reply

    C over $4 (4.05). FAZ basc testing recent lows around $14.25 (14.23 interday)

     

     
    Vermeer
    Vermeer
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 2910
    Posted: Mar. 16, 2010 - 8:26 PM ET #23

    gotta wonder at the sanity of anyone who thought the Fed was going to raise interest rates..what a non story...amazing what passes for news on a slow news day
    Reply
    gotta wonder at the sanity of anyone who thought the Fed was going to raise interest rates..what a non story...amazing what passes for news on a slow news day
     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58440
    Posted: Mar. 16, 2010 - 8:37 PM ET #24

    Check this chart-

    link

    And even worse-

    link

    Dow up 8 in 10 days and 18 of 25.

    Thats greater than 70% up days in the last 5 weeks.


    Reply
    Check this chart-

    link

    And even worse-

    link

    Dow up 8 in 10 days and 18 of 25.

    Thats greater than 70% up days in the last 5 weeks.


     
     
    redhook206
    redhook206
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 91
    Posted: Apr. 25, 2010 - 9:30 AM ET #25

    faz chart = titanic.  going to $8.
    Reply
    faz chart = titanic.  going to $8.
    All Forums | Investments
    12 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Claiming Prizes 57,852
    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 462,954
    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,586
    • Tuesday 10/27/2028 734
    • BEAT Your book 125,728
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 286,486
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 62,945
    • I’m on the Brewers to defeat the Rays in the World Series 4,846
    • MAYbe they $eal The Deal tonight. 974
    • BREW/TB TUESDAY live in game COMMENTS 407

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.