hold on a minute...
why dont you take up your "assenine" argument up with these guys who ranked babalu just two spots below tito on their top 250 all-time mma fighters. at one point, tito was the 205 championa and number one consensus lhw in the world
https://www.sports-ratings.com/fights/mma-top-100-power-rating-peak-ratings-alltime.html
and why dont you take up your "assenine" argument with these guys here who like many,had sobral the number two lhw in 2006 behind liddell
https://www.mmafighting.net/forum/archive/index.php/t-14916.html
and again, take your "assenine"argument up wiht these guys here who still had babaulu as a number nine lhw in 2009
https://forum.mmajunkie.com/forum/threads/world-lhwgp.13436/
and only a complete "assenine" douchebag looking only to argue as opposed to contribute to the discussion would perveresly construe someone saying that "at one point babalu was one of the best fighters in the world" to mean pound for pound as opposed to in his weight class.
but then again that describes you.
a complete "assenine" douchebag.
hold on a minute...
why dont you take up your "assenine" argument up with these guys who ranked babalu just two spots below tito on their top 250 all-time mma fighters. at one point, tito was the 205 championa and number one consensus lhw in the world
https://www.sports-ratings.com/fights/mma-top-100-power-rating-peak-ratings-alltime.html
and why dont you take up your "assenine" argument with these guys here who like many,had sobral the number two lhw in 2006 behind liddell
https://www.mmafighting.net/forum/archive/index.php/t-14916.html
and again, take your "assenine"argument up wiht these guys here who still had babaulu as a number nine lhw in 2009
https://forum.mmajunkie.com/forum/threads/world-lhwgp.13436/
and only a complete "assenine" douchebag looking only to argue as opposed to contribute to the discussion would perveresly construe someone saying that "at one point babalu was one of the best fighters in the world" to mean pound for pound as opposed to in his weight class.
but then again that describes you.
a complete "assenine" douchebag.
if it was universally accepted that babalu was the consensus number two in the 205 division back in 2006 coming off a ten-fight win streak that spanned three years then even if an "assenine" individual would perversely construe "one of the best fighters in the world" to mean pfp as opposed to his weight class then how is benson Henderson, who is number two in the división behind pettis, still on sherdog pfp top 10?
i would asume that most people would consider benson one of the best fighters in the world if he is on a top ten pfp list, no?
https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/6/Sherdogs-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-63095
https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/Sherdogcoms-PoundforPound-Top-10-63091
and how is it that silva is still considered a top 10 pfp and number two consenes at mw behind weidman?
surely pfp candidates Henderson and Silva, both ranked number two in their respective weight class and not coming off 10-fight win streaks spanning three years, would be considered "one of the best fighters in the world" if they are on a top 10 pfp list, no?
so it is possilbe for a number two fighter to be "considered one of the best ifghters in the world," pfp, even though he is not the number one in his weight división.
now to make things even worse for your pathetic "assenine" rebuttal to babalu not being considered one of the best fighters in the world , pfp or in his weight class, sherdog number two rankings have
jds hw
gustufson lhw
silva mw
condit ww
Henderson lw
mendes fw
faber bw
now other than faber, i dont think there is a single non-"assenine" person that would have a problem describing all the other ranked number two fighters to be "one of the best fighters in the world," pfp or in their weight class.
so no matter how you spin it, perverely construe it, suck it or blow it your argument, stricly here for the purposes of showboating and nothing else, shows how worhtless your posts were.
if it was universally accepted that babalu was the consensus number two in the 205 division back in 2006 coming off a ten-fight win streak that spanned three years then even if an "assenine" individual would perversely construe "one of the best fighters in the world" to mean pfp as opposed to his weight class then how is benson Henderson, who is number two in the división behind pettis, still on sherdog pfp top 10?
i would asume that most people would consider benson one of the best fighters in the world if he is on a top ten pfp list, no?
https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/6/Sherdogs-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-63095
https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/Sherdogcoms-PoundforPound-Top-10-63091
and how is it that silva is still considered a top 10 pfp and number two consenes at mw behind weidman?
surely pfp candidates Henderson and Silva, both ranked number two in their respective weight class and not coming off 10-fight win streaks spanning three years, would be considered "one of the best fighters in the world" if they are on a top 10 pfp list, no?
so it is possilbe for a number two fighter to be "considered one of the best ifghters in the world," pfp, even though he is not the number one in his weight división.
now to make things even worse for your pathetic "assenine" rebuttal to babalu not being considered one of the best fighters in the world , pfp or in his weight class, sherdog number two rankings have
jds hw
gustufson lhw
silva mw
condit ww
Henderson lw
mendes fw
faber bw
now other than faber, i dont think there is a single non-"assenine" person that would have a problem describing all the other ranked number two fighters to be "one of the best fighters in the world," pfp or in their weight class.
so no matter how you spin it, perverely construe it, suck it or blow it your argument, stricly here for the purposes of showboating and nothing else, shows how worhtless your posts were.
hold on a minute...
why dont you take up your "assenine" argument up with these guys who ranked babalu just two spots below tito on their top 250 all-time mma fighters. at one point, tito was the 205 championa and number one consensus lhw in the world
https://www.sports-ratings.com/fights/mma-top-100-power-rating-peak-ratings-alltime.html
and why dont you take up your "assenine" argument with these guys here who like many,had sobral the number two lhw in 2006 behind liddell
https://www.mmafighting.net/forum/archive/index.php/t-14916.html
and again, take your "assenine"argument up wiht these guys here who still had babaulu as a number nine lhw in 2009
https://forum.mmajunkie.com/forum/threads/world-lhwgp.13436/
and only a complete "assenine" douchebag looking only to argue as opposed to contribute to the discussion would perveresly construe someone saying that "at one point babalu was one of the best fighters in the world" to mean pound for pound as opposed to in his weight class.
but then again that describes you.
a complete "assenine" douchebag.
hold on a minute...
why dont you take up your "assenine" argument up with these guys who ranked babalu just two spots below tito on their top 250 all-time mma fighters. at one point, tito was the 205 championa and number one consensus lhw in the world
https://www.sports-ratings.com/fights/mma-top-100-power-rating-peak-ratings-alltime.html
and why dont you take up your "assenine" argument with these guys here who like many,had sobral the number two lhw in 2006 behind liddell
https://www.mmafighting.net/forum/archive/index.php/t-14916.html
and again, take your "assenine"argument up wiht these guys here who still had babaulu as a number nine lhw in 2009
https://forum.mmajunkie.com/forum/threads/world-lhwgp.13436/
and only a complete "assenine" douchebag looking only to argue as opposed to contribute to the discussion would perveresly construe someone saying that "at one point babalu was one of the best fighters in the world" to mean pound for pound as opposed to in his weight class.
but then again that describes you.
a complete "assenine" douchebag.
if it was universally accepted that babalu was the consensus number two in the 205 division back in 2006 coming off a ten-fight win streak that spanned three years then even if an "assenine" individual would perversely construe "one of the best fighters in the world" to mean pfp as opposed to his weight class then how is benson Henderson, who is number two in the división behind pettis, still on sherdog pfp top 10?
i would asume that most people would consider benson one of the best fighters in the world if he is on a top ten pfp list, no?
https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/6/Sherdogs-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-63095
https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/Sherdogcoms-PoundforPound-Top-10-63091
and how is it that silva is still considered a top 10 pfp and number two consenes at mw behind weidman?
surely pfp candidates Henderson and Silva, both ranked number two in their respective weight class and not coming off 10-fight win streaks spanning three years, would be considered "one of the best fighters in the world" if they are on a top 10 pfp list, no?
so it is possilbe for a number two fighter to be "considered one of the best ifghters in the world," pfp, even though he is not the number one in his weight división.
now to make things even worse for your pathetic "assenine" rebuttal to babalu not being considered one of the best fighters in the world , pfp or in his weight class, sherdog number two rankings have
jds hw
gustufson lhw
silva mw
condit ww
Henderson lw
mendes fw
faber bw
now other than faber, i dont think there is a single non-"assenine" person that would have a problem describing all the other ranked number two fighters to be "one of the best fighters in the world," pfp or in their weight class.
so no matter how you spin it, perverely construe it, suck it or blow it your argument, stricly here for the purposes of showboating and nothing else, shows how worhtless your posts were.
if it was universally accepted that babalu was the consensus number two in the 205 division back in 2006 coming off a ten-fight win streak that spanned three years then even if an "assenine" individual would perversely construe "one of the best fighters in the world" to mean pfp as opposed to his weight class then how is benson Henderson, who is number two in the división behind pettis, still on sherdog pfp top 10?
i would asume that most people would consider benson one of the best fighters in the world if he is on a top ten pfp list, no?
https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/6/Sherdogs-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-63095
https://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/Sherdogcoms-PoundforPound-Top-10-63091
and how is it that silva is still considered a top 10 pfp and number two consenes at mw behind weidman?
surely pfp candidates Henderson and Silva, both ranked number two in their respective weight class and not coming off 10-fight win streaks spanning three years, would be considered "one of the best fighters in the world" if they are on a top 10 pfp list, no?
so it is possilbe for a number two fighter to be "considered one of the best ifghters in the world," pfp, even though he is not the number one in his weight división.
now to make things even worse for your pathetic "assenine" rebuttal to babalu not being considered one of the best fighters in the world , pfp or in his weight class, sherdog number two rankings have
jds hw
gustufson lhw
silva mw
condit ww
Henderson lw
mendes fw
faber bw
now other than faber, i dont think there is a single non-"assenine" person that would have a problem describing all the other ranked number two fighters to be "one of the best fighters in the world," pfp or in their weight class.
so no matter how you spin it, perverely construe it, suck it or blow it your argument, stricly here for the purposes of showboating and nothing else, shows how worhtless your posts were.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.