MpmAgency cheers, yeah a couple close ones. Aldo/Lamas ITD was a bad bet though. Again great job on your picks!
Gigaouts we all know things go both ways, it doesn't make it any less frustrating. It's pretty natural to be upset about a bad decision. Yeah it's good when you win it but personally I don't get a whole lot out of a very lucky decision going my way (unless a large bet or something), would prefer they just get the judging fixed.
0
MpmAgency cheers, yeah a couple close ones. Aldo/Lamas ITD was a bad bet though. Again great job on your picks!
Gigaouts we all know things go both ways, it doesn't make it any less frustrating. It's pretty natural to be upset about a bad decision. Yeah it's good when you win it but personally I don't get a whole lot out of a very lucky decision going my way (unless a large bet or something), would prefer they just get the judging fixed.
MpmAgency cheers, yeah a couple close ones. Aldo/Lamas ITD was a bad bet though. Again great job on your picks!
Gigaouts we all know things go both ways, it doesn't make it any less frustrating. It's pretty natural to be upset about a bad decision. Yeah it's good when you win it but personally I don't get a whole lot out of a very lucky decision going my way (unless a large bet or something), would prefer they just get the judging fixed.
I really don't see any problem with judging, I think they doing a fine jobs. Mma fan have problem with judging because no matter what is the outcome of the decision, there alway someone disagreeing with the decision due to bias of their favor fighter or they have $$$ on the line. I can only recall handful of bad judging, I consider bad juding went a fighter wins but every mma media outlets said he lost. If the media is virtual split in the Catone vs Watson fight,
how can you fault the judges decision went the media don't even have a clear winner? It is understandable to get fustrated losing a close decision but saying judging is bad because you lost a split decision is not logical. I can guaranteen you that there close equal of number of fan agree with Catone vs Watson decision.I am 1 of those agreeing with decision and if the decison went to Watson, I could see that too.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ctm1985:
MpmAgency cheers, yeah a couple close ones. Aldo/Lamas ITD was a bad bet though. Again great job on your picks!
Gigaouts we all know things go both ways, it doesn't make it any less frustrating. It's pretty natural to be upset about a bad decision. Yeah it's good when you win it but personally I don't get a whole lot out of a very lucky decision going my way (unless a large bet or something), would prefer they just get the judging fixed.
I really don't see any problem with judging, I think they doing a fine jobs. Mma fan have problem with judging because no matter what is the outcome of the decision, there alway someone disagreeing with the decision due to bias of their favor fighter or they have $$$ on the line. I can only recall handful of bad judging, I consider bad juding went a fighter wins but every mma media outlets said he lost. If the media is virtual split in the Catone vs Watson fight,
how can you fault the judges decision went the media don't even have a clear winner? It is understandable to get fustrated losing a close decision but saying judging is bad because you lost a split decision is not logical. I can guaranteen you that there close equal of number of fan agree with Catone vs Watson decision.I am 1 of those agreeing with decision and if the decison went to Watson, I could see that too.
cheers, yeah a couple close ones. Aldo/Lamas ITD was a bad bet though. Again great job on your picks!
Hot Forum Topics
