@OO7CRUSHER
@Premian
@yourpalhal
@TDHCentral
I'll be watching the "lineup cards" closely to see if star slugger for the Yankees, Juan SOTO, is inserted back in. If so, I will lean to NYY but only for a smallish price.......
If he remains OUT I will pass on the game....
I'll be watching the "lineup cards" closely to see if star slugger for the Yankees, Juan SOTO, is inserted back in. If so, I will lean to NYY but only for a smallish price.......
If he remains OUT I will pass on the game....
Cardinals are a *Best Bet now
Cardinals are a *Best Bet now
VALUE BETS?
50-50 coin-flippers worthy of a look if getting good PLUS MONEY!
I have 3 in my handicapping sheets but it's likely 2 won't come into a play.
I need at bare minimum +120 or it just isn't worth it.
Royals game .....I bet KC, as they gain SIGNIFICANT PLUS MONEY
Reds game .... likely won't qualify with small ML
Yankees game ....dead even if SOTO is not in the lineup for NYY but I would still need at least +120 ML, which is NOT available at this time
VALUE BETS?
50-50 coin-flippers worthy of a look if getting good PLUS MONEY!
I have 3 in my handicapping sheets but it's likely 2 won't come into a play.
I need at bare minimum +120 or it just isn't worth it.
Royals game .....I bet KC, as they gain SIGNIFICANT PLUS MONEY
Reds game .... likely won't qualify with small ML
Yankees game ....dead even if SOTO is not in the lineup for NYY but I would still need at least +120 ML, which is NOT available at this time
Like the BB today fubah.
Good luck on today's plays.
@Coloneljim
THANKS, Jim! Sh*t that reminds me, I forgot to check to see if you have a POD ready yet....
Like the BB today fubah.
Good luck on today's plays.
@Coloneljim
THANKS, Jim! Sh*t that reminds me, I forgot to check to see if you have a POD ready yet....
My handicapped edges for selective games today:
Cardinals +2.1 runs
Red Sox +1.3 runs ....but ML a bit too high to justify a bet
Brewskys +1.3 runs
Orioles +1.2 runs
Twinkies +1.1 runs
Padres +1.0 runs ... yes, the Padres!....but not worse than -145 max ml
Cleveland +0.8 runs ....but ML too high to justify the risk
The rest is the usual crapshoot
ROYALS are my "value" bet today
My handicapped edges for selective games today:
Cardinals +2.1 runs
Red Sox +1.3 runs ....but ML a bit too high to justify a bet
Brewskys +1.3 runs
Orioles +1.2 runs
Twinkies +1.1 runs
Padres +1.0 runs ... yes, the Padres!....but not worse than -145 max ml
Cleveland +0.8 runs ....but ML too high to justify the risk
The rest is the usual crapshoot
ROYALS are my "value" bet today
Very interesting stats from my capping sheets...
Beginning May 01 through Friday, June 06,
these are how the HEAVY FAVS have fared (does not include April)
I define HEAVY FAVS as a closing moneyline of at least -170
6 - 4 -7.10u SUPER HEAVY FAVS -300 to -350 = BIG FAT LOSER!
(this range had 1 winner by one run, ie a loss on RL)
48 - 24 HEAVY FAVS in -200 to -299 range = BIG FAT LOSER!
(this range had 5 winners by one run, ie, 43 - 29 on RL)
42 - 28 HEAVY FAVS in -170 to -199 range = BIG FAT LOSER!
(this range had 10 winners by one run, ie, 32 - 38 on RL)
Very interesting stats from my capping sheets...
Beginning May 01 through Friday, June 06,
these are how the HEAVY FAVS have fared (does not include April)
I define HEAVY FAVS as a closing moneyline of at least -170
6 - 4 -7.10u SUPER HEAVY FAVS -300 to -350 = BIG FAT LOSER!
(this range had 1 winner by one run, ie a loss on RL)
48 - 24 HEAVY FAVS in -200 to -299 range = BIG FAT LOSER!
(this range had 5 winners by one run, ie, 43 - 29 on RL)
42 - 28 HEAVY FAVS in -170 to -199 range = BIG FAT LOSER!
(this range had 10 winners by one run, ie, 32 - 38 on RL)
ie, 50-50 coin-flippers worthy of a look if getting good PLUS MONEY!
I have 3 in my handicapping sheets but it's likely 2 won't come into a play.
I need at bare minimum +120 or it just isn't worth it.
Royals game .....I bet KC, as they gain SIGNIFICANT PLUS MONEY
Reds game .....won't qualify with very small ML
Yankees game ....dead even if SOTO is not in the lineup for NYY but I would still need at least +120 ML, which is NOT available at this time
ie, 50-50 coin-flippers worthy of a look if getting good PLUS MONEY!
I have 3 in my handicapping sheets but it's likely 2 won't come into a play.
I need at bare minimum +120 or it just isn't worth it.
Royals game .....I bet KC, as they gain SIGNIFICANT PLUS MONEY
Reds game .....won't qualify with very small ML
Yankees game ....dead even if SOTO is not in the lineup for NYY but I would still need at least +120 ML, which is NOT available at this time
I’ll tell you as I said with the Dodgers 2 weeks ago, Major Yankee hitting slump in progress.. basically have 2 hitters without Soto.. Stanton is highly useless even if good hitter counts destroying rallies..
Ohtani's last 12 games have been bad too
I like the Dodgers and under
I’ll tell you as I said with the Dodgers 2 weeks ago, Major Yankee hitting slump in progress.. basically have 2 hitters without Soto.. Stanton is highly useless even if good hitter counts destroying rallies..
Ohtani's last 12 games have been bad too
I like the Dodgers and under
On Thursday, my capping sheet identified Pittsburgh +159 as the 50-50 coinflipper "value" bet, ...but it lost
Friday, the pick was Oakland +140. WINNER!
Today, the pick was Royals +123. WINNER!
On Thursday, my capping sheet identified Pittsburgh +159 as the 50-50 coinflipper "value" bet, ...but it lost
Friday, the pick was Oakland +140. WINNER!
Today, the pick was Royals +123. WINNER!
[Quote: Originally Posted by fubah2]Very interesting stats from my capping sheets...
Beginning May 01 through Saturday, June 08, these are how the HEAVY FAVS have fared (does not include April)
I define HEAVY FAVS as a closing moneyline of at least -170
UPDATED:
6 - 4 -7.10u SUPER HEAVY FAVS -300 to -350 = BIG FAT LOSER!
(this range had 1 winner by one run, ie a loss on RL)
48 - 26 HEAVY FAVS in -200 to -299 range = BIG FAT LOSER!
(this range had 5 winners by one run, ie, 43 - 31 on RL)
44 - 28 HEAVY FAVS in -170 to -199 range = BIG FAT LOSER!
(this range had 11 winners by one run, ie, 33 - 39 on RL)
[Quote: Originally Posted by fubah2]Very interesting stats from my capping sheets...
Beginning May 01 through Saturday, June 08, these are how the HEAVY FAVS have fared (does not include April)
I define HEAVY FAVS as a closing moneyline of at least -170
UPDATED:
6 - 4 -7.10u SUPER HEAVY FAVS -300 to -350 = BIG FAT LOSER!
(this range had 1 winner by one run, ie a loss on RL)
48 - 26 HEAVY FAVS in -200 to -299 range = BIG FAT LOSER!
(this range had 5 winners by one run, ie, 43 - 31 on RL)
44 - 28 HEAVY FAVS in -170 to -199 range = BIG FAT LOSER!
(this range had 11 winners by one run, ie, 33 - 39 on RL)
@fubah2
Thanks for the information. I have noticed that my results above -170 are not as good as hoped.
I think I'll try to not go above -170 on my Baseball bets.
Best of Luck on your picks today.
@fubah2
Thanks for the information. I have noticed that my results above -170 are not as good as hoped.
I think I'll try to not go above -170 on my Baseball bets.
Best of Luck on your picks today.
All my sources say Waldrep, from AAA.....will monitor......
If so, what happened to FRIED is my Q?
All my sources say Waldrep, from AAA.....will monitor......
If so, what happened to FRIED is my Q?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.